Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Lemmy Shitpost
  3. It's a tragedeigh

It's a tragedeigh

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Lemmy Shitpost
lemmyshitpost
85 Posts 52 Posters 1 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L [email protected]

    Interesting that Q essntially fills up for every other character in the initialism, incluing the + which essenially acts as an etc. to said initialism. One can pretty much choose and pick which letters to use when crafting their usage of an initialism, and which letters to hide in the +. One could call it the LBT+ community, or the L+, or T+. Or B+. Or just call it + for maximum efficiency. Or you could just call it the Q community, as Q encompasses everything else. What some otherwise call the Queer community

    Edit: I am no expert. Let the gays correct me if needed be

    Z This user is from outside of this forum
    Z This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #7

    A big downside to that is that queer was originally insult and some people have negative associations with it and therefore avoid it and might not want to be categorized as such I have heard the "queer community" be used especially in spoken language. The letters LGBT have also been around for a while so it would be weird to get rid of them now.

    L L 2 Replies Last reply
    4
    • O [email protected]

      I think the point is that the classification into discrete categories is kind of contrary to the point of queerness.

      Z This user is from outside of this forum
      Z This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #8

      I don't really see how you got that from the comment but that would be a good point.

      O 1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • Z [email protected]

        I don't really see how you got that from the comment but that would be a good point.

        O This user is from outside of this forum
        O This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #9

        Yeah im probably reading too much into it.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • Z [email protected]

          I usually only hear LGBTQIA+ which has the I for intersex and the A Aro/Ace spectrum. The Q is just queer which is a an umbrella term for everything. I don't really see the issue with others though, I also wouldn't know how to make it less complicated in any language. Describing oneself as straight is just comparatively easy as it one thing rather than every other sexuality + also gender stuff. Being homosexual is also just one word and no more difficult.

          default_defect@midwest.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
          default_defect@midwest.socialD This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by [email protected]
          #10

          If "queer" is an umbrella term then why wouldn't the whole community just be referred to as such?

          L Z 2 Replies Last reply
          8
          • Z [email protected]

            A big downside to that is that queer was originally insult and some people have negative associations with it and therefore avoid it and might not want to be categorized as such I have heard the "queer community" be used especially in spoken language. The letters LGBT have also been around for a while so it would be weird to get rid of them now.

            L This user is from outside of this forum
            L This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by [email protected]
            #11

            Acts of consentuality. I feel I want to be informed and so I try to keep up, but no one should have the burden of having to keep up with any changes in verbage. I think it would be nice to have it voiced as simply as consentual. There really is no other information anyone should care about. Sex/gender/number of people, none of it matters.

            Whether they marry monogamously, date openly, love however the person chooses to. It isn't for me to cast my opinion on their acts, so it may cause harm to put detailed labels, as then they are easier to be weaponized.

            That doesn't mean people shouldn't or couldn't openly discuss their choices, just that when you make the boxes and ask people to put themselves in them, then the boxes divide the people, which is easier to "conquer"

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Z [email protected]

              I usually only hear LGBTQIA+ which has the I for intersex and the A Aro/Ace spectrum. The Q is just queer which is a an umbrella term for everything. I don't really see the issue with others though, I also wouldn't know how to make it less complicated in any language. Describing oneself as straight is just comparatively easy as it one thing rather than every other sexuality + also gender stuff. Being homosexual is also just one word and no more difficult.

              F This user is from outside of this forum
              F This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #12

              As a way to simplify, I’ve always like GSM: Gender and Sexual Minorities. Seems to encompass everything without prioritizing any of the letters, and doesn’t require choosing an arbitrary stop point for which letters to list or not list.

              B 1 Reply Last reply
              3
              • S [email protected]

                [email protected]

                not very active yet unfortunately but it was more of a hit than one would think on reddit

                B This user is from outside of this forum
                B This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by [email protected]
                #13

                I think Sigurd Felix Wolfgang Atreides has some very rich parents.

                1 Reply Last reply
                5
                • F [email protected]

                  As a way to simplify, I’ve always like GSM: Gender and Sexual Minorities. Seems to encompass everything without prioritizing any of the letters, and doesn’t require choosing an arbitrary stop point for which letters to list or not list.

                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #14

                  My nerdy ass brain was like "how in the Windows environment can someone like GSM" and then I continued reading…

                  T 1 Reply Last reply
                  1
                  • A [email protected]

                    "The terms pansexual, omnisexual, fluid and queer-identified are regarded as falling under the umbrella term bisexual (and therefore are considered a part of the bisexual community). Some use LGBT+ to mean "LGBT and related communities".[29] Other variants may have a "U" for "unsure"; a "C" for "curious"; another "T" for "transvestite"; a "TS", "2S", or "2" for "two-spirit" persons; or an "SA" for "straight allies".[48][49][50][51][52] The inclusion of straight allies in the LGBT initialism has proven controversial, as many straight allies have been accused of using LGBT advocacy to gain popularity and status in recent years,[53] and various LGBT activists have criticised the heteronormative worldview of certain straight allies.[54] Some may also add a "P" for "polyamorous" or "pangender", an "H" for "HIV-affected", or an "O" for "other".[14][55] The initialism LGBTIH has seen use in India to encompass the hijra third gender identity and the related subculture.[56][57]"

                    Only Anglo-Saxons can make not being straight an overly structured and semantically confusing endeavour, lol. 🤷

                    jackbydev@programming.devJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jackbydev@programming.devJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #15

                    There are straight trans people in the LGBT community. It's not as simple as "not straight".

                    A 1 Reply Last reply
                    8
                    • A [email protected]

                      "The terms pansexual, omnisexual, fluid and queer-identified are regarded as falling under the umbrella term bisexual (and therefore are considered a part of the bisexual community). Some use LGBT+ to mean "LGBT and related communities".[29] Other variants may have a "U" for "unsure"; a "C" for "curious"; another "T" for "transvestite"; a "TS", "2S", or "2" for "two-spirit" persons; or an "SA" for "straight allies".[48][49][50][51][52] The inclusion of straight allies in the LGBT initialism has proven controversial, as many straight allies have been accused of using LGBT advocacy to gain popularity and status in recent years,[53] and various LGBT activists have criticised the heteronormative worldview of certain straight allies.[54] Some may also add a "P" for "polyamorous" or "pangender", an "H" for "HIV-affected", or an "O" for "other".[14][55] The initialism LGBTIH has seen use in India to encompass the hijra third gender identity and the related subculture.[56][57]"

                      Only Anglo-Saxons can make not being straight an overly structured and semantically confusing endeavour, lol. 🤷

                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      T This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #16

                      as a member of the letter gang, can we just call ourselves the letter gang and be done with it?

                      A indibrony@lemmy.worldI 2 Replies Last reply
                      5
                      • B [email protected]

                        My nerdy ass brain was like "how in the Windows environment can someone like GSM" and then I continued reading…

                        T This user is from outside of this forum
                        T This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #17

                        What's wrong with gsm?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • D [email protected]
                          This post did not contain any content.
                          fortatech@gregtech.euF This user is from outside of this forum
                          fortatech@gregtech.euF This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #18

                          Omg, is that Matt Bernstein??!!

                          M 1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • T [email protected]

                            as a member of the letter gang, can we just call ourselves the letter gang and be done with it?

                            A This user is from outside of this forum
                            A This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #19

                            Short and badass... I'd sign the petition. 😅

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • jackbydev@programming.devJ [email protected]

                              There are straight trans people in the LGBT community. It's not as simple as "not straight".

                              A This user is from outside of this forum
                              A This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #20

                              Enlighten me, Jack.

                              Z jackbydev@programming.devJ frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.worldF 3 Replies Last reply
                              0
                              • default_defect@midwest.socialD [email protected]

                                If "queer" is an umbrella term then why wouldn't the whole community just be referred to as such?

                                L This user is from outside of this forum
                                L This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #21

                                Similarly, I'm not 100% sure about this but afaik the + got commonly added before the IA, and I really dislike adding anything specific after a generalized "everyone who feels part of it" because doing that delegitimizes that the + actually means everyone. Though it also does suck if people feel excluded otherwise.

                                I've seen queer used to refer to the whole community though, but I think LGBT(+whichever addendums) has just been around for so long it's most people's goto, plus "queer" used to be a slur.

                                In my head it's just "people not conforming to the majority group for sex or gender related reasons" and then I write whatever my brain decides is the term in that moment. Usually LGBTQ+.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                4
                                • D [email protected]
                                  This post did not contain any content.
                                  logicaldrivel@sopuli.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  logicaldrivel@sopuli.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #22

                                  I met someone in a dream last night named Fobertleigh. There is no point to this, The post just reminded me of it.

                                  G zoomboingding@lemmy.worldZ D R 4 Replies Last reply
                                  21
                                  • T [email protected]

                                    as a member of the letter gang, can we just call ourselves the letter gang and be done with it?

                                    indibrony@lemmy.worldI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    indibrony@lemmy.worldI This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by [email protected]
                                    #23

                                    I propose it should be changed to PFQ: "Pretty. Fucking. Queer." 🏳️‍🌈

                                    Z 1 Reply Last reply
                                    1
                                    • logicaldrivel@sopuli.xyzL [email protected]

                                      I met someone in a dream last night named Fobertleigh. There is no point to this, The post just reminded me of it.

                                      G This user is from outside of this forum
                                      G This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #24

                                      That's kinda neat. Out of curiosity did they tell you their name in the dream or did you just sort of know it?

                                      logicaldrivel@sopuli.xyzL 1 Reply Last reply
                                      2
                                      • G [email protected]

                                        That's kinda neat. Out of curiosity did they tell you their name in the dream or did you just sort of know it?

                                        logicaldrivel@sopuli.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        logicaldrivel@sopuli.xyzL This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #25

                                        They told me. I was at work and introducing myself to someone new. Looking back now, I think it was a girl I went to highschool with but her name most certainly wasn't Fobertleigh back then.

                                        O 1 Reply Last reply
                                        3
                                        • indibrony@lemmy.worldI [email protected]

                                          I propose it should be changed to PFQ: "Pretty. Fucking. Queer." 🏳️‍🌈

                                          Z This user is from outside of this forum
                                          Z This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #26

                                          Think of the asexuals! PQ (pretty, queer) or POFQ (pretty, optionally fucking, queer) are much better.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups