I just want to afford to see a movie goddammit
-
This post did not contain any content.
Yo ho, me hearties!
-
I used to love going to the movies, but theaters are just a shit experience these days. People on their phones, people talking. Nobody has any fucking manners anymore.
As long as they stay offa mah lawn!
-
Yeah exactly. Going to a movie shouldn't need to be something that is budgeted into place.
As for homeless meaning being on the street... yeah. Probably. I'm waiting for a few phone calls at the moment but things aren't looking good. Also doing some other stuff on the side. Posted the memes and answering comments in between so my heart doesn't explode from the stress. My watch has been freaking out about a high BPM for a while now. And I'm frustrated because this was fucking avoidable if someone did the thing I said to do repeatedly. But they didn't and here we are.
Ain’t that the way
I’m not sure I can express it properly but I’m rootin’ for ya.
-
Needlessly judgemental, wow.
I'm talking about sailing the high seas. I guess that didn't come across.
-
I'm talking about sailing the high seas. I guess that didn't come across.
“Going to see a movie” or “see a movie” is pretty universally understood as meaning “to go to the movie theater.”
-
Yo ho, me hearties!
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Just bought a house after years of hunting. I'm /absolutely/ building a home theater in the basement to enjoy my home media server from once I can afford it in...17 years or so, assuming society hasn't collapsed by then.
-
Just bought a house after years of hunting. I'm /absolutely/ building a home theater in the basement to enjoy my home media server from once I can afford it in...17 years or so, assuming society hasn't collapsed by then.
And, if it has, then you can just dedicate your former neighbors' homes to whatever projects you like! So much room for activities!
-
Needlessly judgemental, wow.
As an autistic person who sees information sharing as more valid and respectable than affirming possible ignorant perspectives for the sake of obtuse social saliency, all I see is a fact and a valid question.
Also valid advice for those with money.
If you can save money from a theater ticket to another Disney slop live action remake, and donate that money to independent artists trying to survive and simultaneously have a voice despite the Disney/warner types stranglehold over sellable cinema for most public spaces.People get so upset when anything questions their current trajectory, rather than saying "oh yeah, that's a valid perspective to avoid the issue in context."
And gets a lot of autistic people yelled at for doing their job or trying to help, IMO.
Is there a reason the advice and question aren't valid? To me the only rudeness here is in the framing of the rebuke.
This isn't trying to one up anyone, this is an attempt to communicate, and improve people's ability to communicate.
I've even seen doctors excuse bullying of autistic children because the child joined discussion of test scores without pandering to the ego of people that were socially affirming how terrible the test must be, due to their performance.
At this point people need to start trying to understand the double empathy problem, because it's valid for more cases of communication differences than just autism.
Thank you for reading!
-
And, if it has, then you can just dedicate your former neighbors' homes to whatever projects you like! So much room for activities!
Aw hell, if it's collapsed I'll just start a big "drive" in theater and have community showings! No society means no copyright enforcement!
-
Ain’t that the way
I’m not sure I can express it properly but I’m rootin’ for ya.
I'm rooting for an anyerusm.
-
Aw hell, if it's collapsed I'll just start a big "drive" in theater and have community showings! No society means no copyright enforcement!
Bonus: you can sit in allll the seats! (Well, as long as Wilson isn't being a whingy bitch again.)
-
I used to love going to the movies, but theaters are just a shit experience these days. People on their phones, people talking. Nobody has any fucking manners anymore.
Honestly I've seen little to none of that. I don't go that often, but at least like 4x/year
-
As an autistic person who sees information sharing as more valid and respectable than affirming possible ignorant perspectives for the sake of obtuse social saliency, all I see is a fact and a valid question.
Also valid advice for those with money.
If you can save money from a theater ticket to another Disney slop live action remake, and donate that money to independent artists trying to survive and simultaneously have a voice despite the Disney/warner types stranglehold over sellable cinema for most public spaces.People get so upset when anything questions their current trajectory, rather than saying "oh yeah, that's a valid perspective to avoid the issue in context."
And gets a lot of autistic people yelled at for doing their job or trying to help, IMO.
Is there a reason the advice and question aren't valid? To me the only rudeness here is in the framing of the rebuke.
This isn't trying to one up anyone, this is an attempt to communicate, and improve people's ability to communicate.
I've even seen doctors excuse bullying of autistic children because the child joined discussion of test scores without pandering to the ego of people that were socially affirming how terrible the test must be, due to their performance.
At this point people need to start trying to understand the double empathy problem, because it's valid for more cases of communication differences than just autism.
Thank you for reading!
It is the framing, yes. The second half reads as telling OP that it's bad to want to go to the theatre in a conscensing way.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Theaters haven't been worth going to for 2 decades now. I don't understand people's obsession with it. My giant screen at home looks and sounds better, I'm more comfortable, more relaxed, and can go at my pace.
Screw theaters. I haven't been to one in like 15 years. Super not worth it and everyone I know IRL who goes mostly complains.
-
As an autistic person who sees information sharing as more valid and respectable than affirming possible ignorant perspectives for the sake of obtuse social saliency, all I see is a fact and a valid question.
Also valid advice for those with money.
If you can save money from a theater ticket to another Disney slop live action remake, and donate that money to independent artists trying to survive and simultaneously have a voice despite the Disney/warner types stranglehold over sellable cinema for most public spaces.People get so upset when anything questions their current trajectory, rather than saying "oh yeah, that's a valid perspective to avoid the issue in context."
And gets a lot of autistic people yelled at for doing their job or trying to help, IMO.
Is there a reason the advice and question aren't valid? To me the only rudeness here is in the framing of the rebuke.
This isn't trying to one up anyone, this is an attempt to communicate, and improve people's ability to communicate.
I've even seen doctors excuse bullying of autistic children because the child joined discussion of test scores without pandering to the ego of people that were socially affirming how terrible the test must be, due to their performance.
At this point people need to start trying to understand the double empathy problem, because it's valid for more cases of communication differences than just autism.
Thank you for reading!
So you say you're autistic...
You're right that its the framing here that reads as very rude - if someone is expressing their desire to do something, coming in and presenting something else as a clearly morally superior choice and denigrating the thing they wanted to do is considered quite rude; both because it assumes they're somehow ignorant of the alternative choices and thus couldn't have made an informed decision, and because it comes across like you're asserting your own preferences as "more valid" than theirs.
Much as with all other forms of encoding (limerick, haiku, .mp4, web packets, semaphore, all written languages, etc) the format in which a lemmy comment is left is as critical to the communication of it's idea as the actual content of the words themselves.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Find an independently owned theater near you. While it may not be an IMAX screen it's still the theater experience and likely way cheaper. I haven't paid more than $5 per ticket to see a movie in years.
-
Do not put yourself in danger. Our anonymity is not yet mature.
Unknown OS Download Tribler 8.1.3 (stable)
Why the fuck are you recommending this shit?!
Do you know a guaranteed anonymous filesharing client?
-
As an autistic person who sees information sharing as more valid and respectable than affirming possible ignorant perspectives for the sake of obtuse social saliency, all I see is a fact and a valid question.
Also valid advice for those with money.
If you can save money from a theater ticket to another Disney slop live action remake, and donate that money to independent artists trying to survive and simultaneously have a voice despite the Disney/warner types stranglehold over sellable cinema for most public spaces.People get so upset when anything questions their current trajectory, rather than saying "oh yeah, that's a valid perspective to avoid the issue in context."
And gets a lot of autistic people yelled at for doing their job or trying to help, IMO.
Is there a reason the advice and question aren't valid? To me the only rudeness here is in the framing of the rebuke.
This isn't trying to one up anyone, this is an attempt to communicate, and improve people's ability to communicate.
I've even seen doctors excuse bullying of autistic children because the child joined discussion of test scores without pandering to the ego of people that were socially affirming how terrible the test must be, due to their performance.
At this point people need to start trying to understand the double empathy problem, because it's valid for more cases of communication differences than just autism.
Thank you for reading!
There's an older joke about being able to afford things that might put this into light for you; "I wish I had the money to afford an expensive Italian sports car. I don't want to buy one, I just want to be able to afford it."
-
Aw hell, if it's collapsed I'll just start a big "drive" in theater and have community showings! No society means no copyright enforcement!
Sounds like a cinema with more steps
-
There's an older joke about being able to afford things that might put this into light for you; "I wish I had the money to afford an expensive Italian sports car. I don't want to buy one, I just want to be able to afford it."
wrote on last edited by [email protected]makes sense. i'm coming to see how people do this, but it's still baffling to me.
by 'this' i mean socially affirming each-other, rather than trying to interact with the issue in any way. not just as preferred, but as a forced exclusive.also legitimately sorry that i can't compress the whole picture to a quick quip.but what i meant by my comment was as much asserting that the comment being downvoted to oblivion was possibly more misinterpreted in intent and meaning than their own interaction with OP's meme.
i see it as low dimensional communication exacerbating the size of blindspots for the whole of what is being communicated,, because everyone is trying to reduce the energy consumption of language by socially affirming heuristics built on salient preference. this can be mapped to first principles from friston's free energy principle, into active inference. MITpress has a good textbook for it, although there's been a lot of new work since then. those who don't naturally share that preference become 'wrong' for communicating what they could interpret without having that same importance given tothings they might not think about, like social ego stroking over just interacting with the concept sans ego.more commonly, people are becoming familiar with the 'double empathy problem'
basically a context and language equivalent to yelling at the autistic kid for not making levels of eye contact that they find painfully intimate and uncomfortable. yes, the local community can think eye contact is 'just having basic manners' or 'just being a decent person,' but forcing them to do it, and creating a majority salient confirmation bubble chastising them for not doing it constantly and confidently is salt in the wound.again, thank you for reading this far if you has. none of this is accusatory towards anyone, just an honest attempt at noting current popular communication failures and how to frame them.
the double empathy problem also applies to most predictive models projecting in differently socialized spaces. it's good for people to comprehend.
