Perspective
-
Not just that, but the steps seem unreasonably tall and get shorter in the distance.
Maybe but we don't know where this is, stair styles could vary in different regions.
-
How are y'all arguing this? The banister makes it unquestionably obvious that it's at the top. There's no debate to be had here unless the banister was intentionally installed wrong just for the purpose of this meme, which would be crazy.
The mattress is at the top, y'all.
IKR. This was the obvious answer 24 hours ago but here we are discussing wear patterns and contrast.
-
This post did not contain any content.
The mattress is a metaphor, it doesn't matter where it is.
-
It's at the top, I have that same bannister mount, it points upwards to the banister.
The mattress is wedged at the top of the stairs thanks to its extreme springiness.
wrote on last edited by [email protected]This is what gets me confused. If we're at the top, I see the banister mount turning horizontal, not up. Up from that POV would be towards the viewer, but it's angled away which would be horizontal. We have to be looking from the bottom for it to be turning up in this photo. I have no idea how hundreds of people look at that and say it's turning up.E: nevermind, the question asked where the mattress is, not where I am looking from.
-
The mattress is a metaphor, it doesn't matter where it is.
There is no mattress.
-
This is gonna be our white and gold/black and blue dress, huh?
I don't think so. This mattress is pretty clearly black and blue, unlike the dress.
-
How are y'all arguing this? The banister makes it unquestionably obvious that it's at the top. There's no debate to be had here unless the banister was intentionally installed wrong just for the purpose of this meme, which would be crazy.
The mattress is at the top, y'all.
There's no banister in the picture. It looks like maybe there's a support for a banister, but that doesn't magically make the tops of the steps into the sides of the steps.
-
There is no mattress.
Omg you are right!
-
Yeah.
It’s below that grab bar thing and looks like old shit. I’m guessing a stud is there and the wall isn’t flat so it’s poking out and they joined the moulding there too. Or a shit repair like I’d do.
Also I say the mattress is at the top because lighting and the stair surfaces look like vertical riser height but that’s just grasping.
but that’s just grasping.
Heh. Banister jokes, classic.
-
I see no reason whatsoever to suspect this
Look at how it is.
-
Well dear friend, let's agree to disagree. I wish you a pleasant end of the day!
May your steps be as uncushioned as you prefer. Love is love.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I know as someone who has rabbits and cats that the hairfall on the close to camera stairs indicates we are at the top looking down. I know hair patterns.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Steps in a staircase have two measurements. Tread and rise. The proportions of what we can see make more sense as treads rather than rises. Therefore the mattress is at the bottom. Also what we can see of the handrail would make sense in either direction.
-
There's no banister in the picture. It looks like maybe there's a support for a banister, but that doesn't magically make the tops of the steps into the sides of the steps.
Ok. Then use what you know of gravity and look for things that should be the other way if this were at the bottom.
-
Steps in a staircase have two measurements. Tread and rise. The proportions of what we can see make more sense as treads rather than rises. Therefore the mattress is at the bottom. Also what we can see of the handrail would make sense in either direction.
it's about the wear patterns in the Berber.
that's the bottom of the stairs because we're looking at the treads.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote on last edited by [email protected]
The wear on the steps say bottom
-
There is no mattress.
The cake is a lie.
-
This post did not contain any content.
The carpet has wear on one side, and it doesn't make sense for the wear to be on the front of each stair, so most likely we're looking down from the top of the flight of stairs.
-
There's no banister in the picture. It looks like maybe there's a support for a banister, but that doesn't magically make the tops of the steps into the sides of the steps.
If you are so pedantic so as to not consider the support for the banister as part of the banister, then frankly I have no interest in the necessary effort required to discuss this or any matter further with you.
-
If you are so pedantic so as to not consider the support for the banister as part of the banister, then frankly I have no interest in the necessary effort required to discuss this or any matter further with you.
I'm not the one being pedantic. Whatever that object is, it's not clear that it's a banister.
