Trump suggests taking over New York City and Washington
-
So, to my fellow Americans in NYC, how are those gun laws working out? That's a smartass question, but more seriously, what will you do when the Gestapo comes rolling down Flatbush Avenue?
I'll never find it again, but a few years ago jihadis went rampaging down the streets in Iran, randomly shooting into apartment blocks. All I could think was, "At least that can't happen here."
Yeah, I have to rescind my movie friends statement.
-
As a resident of Washington state, I really wish these articles would include D.C. when they refer to the country's capital. This time, they are referring to D.C.
Yeah I went bug eyed there for a sec as a fellow resident
-
As a resident of Washington state, I really wish these articles would include D.C. when they refer to the country's capital. This time, they are referring to D.C.
I was so fucking confused lol
-
This post did not contain any content.
Death to the fascists
-
They're going just about as well as they are everywhere else in the US, barring that one guy in Texas that got killed opening fired on a Border Patrol facility the other day. Before you get too snarky, let's have some examples of the folks in states that always have a hard-on for gun ownership who are actually proving what you're implying here? Oh, the good gun-owners generally aren't rising up, but those states are actually welcoming the Gestapo with open arms, since they voted for this? What a surprise.
Keep on living in your fantasy world that the 2nd Amendment bros are going to actually get off their asses and do something about it. Other than cheering it on, that is.
I'm from Texas, and if I had a nickel for every responsible gun owner I know I'd have $0.00.
-
As a resident of Washington state, I really wish these articles would include D.C. when they refer to the country's capital. This time, they are referring to D.C.
I’ve noticed with politics it’s pretty east coast centric along with comedy television/movies. Just assume it’s DC when it’s politics.
-
This post did not contain any content.
This is dementia ramblings.
They could have asked him about cheese and I bet he would've talked about doing a tremendous job at making cheese grate again.
-
What a coincidence, I suggest Trump goes and fucks himself with the green side of a pineapple
Why just one side? Keep pushing it in until he can feel both sides.
-
So, to my fellow Americans in NYC, how are those gun laws working out? That's a smartass question, but more seriously, what will you do when the Gestapo comes rolling down Flatbush Avenue?
I'll never find it again, but a few years ago jihadis went rampaging down the streets in Iran, randomly shooting into apartment blocks. All I could think was, "At least that can't happen here."
I for one haven't forgotten that you think banging 17 year olds is fine
-
As a resident of Washington state, I really wish these articles would include D.C. when they refer to the country's capital. This time, they are referring to D.C.
It's a city named Washington which is the most relevant to US politics so it kind of makes sense.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Waiting any minute until I see Chairman Trump as a decoration.
-
I for one haven't forgotten that you think banging 17 year olds is fine
Oof, coming out of left field with a damn tank over here, when all this guy has is a plastic butter knife and sarcasm.
You got a link for this? Like, I don't want it to be true but holy shit, what a sentence.
-
Oof, coming out of left field with a damn tank over here, when all this guy has is a plastic butter knife and sarcasm.
You got a link for this? Like, I don't want it to be true but holy shit, what a sentence.
wrote last edited by [email protected]I tagged them long ago when they said something along the lines of "come on a 17 year old is really physically an adult" referring to sexuality. I often tag people if they say something sus or fucked up and i often see repeat behavior from them. So in this case I see another weird conservative viewpoint coming up from the same dude, I gotta call them.
I would find that comment for ya but it honestly might take a long time to do so.
-
It's a city named Washington which is the most relevant to US politics so it kind of makes sense.
Yes, but it's easy to confuse with the state when "D.C." isn't included.
-
Yes, but it's easy to confuse with the state when "D.C." isn't included.
Without context, surely so. With context I think a moment to process is all that is required. I guess it would have been a good idea not to name two important places in the US the same thing.
-
Fuck the mods!
Violence will be the only correct response if this is done.
Actively overturning an election bc the other party won, is a call to remove those in charge by any means.
wrote last edited by [email protected]Fuck the mods
First off, to be clear, I don't agree with this statement, I think it's the wrong stance.
But after that, I think this is a really an interesting point. [In general I understand a policy of not inciting violence] but if for instance, (purely hypothetically) the country were to fall into civil war (a crazy suggestion I know), wouldn't this policy instantly seem inappropriate?
I mean, encouraging people to join the war effort would be a matter of course, to quash that sentiment and silence those voices seems unethical.
As we slip closer to that possible outcome, surely the time for seriously talking about violence would come before the first shot is fired, right? So where do you draw that line? At what point is a statement which incites violence "violating site rules" and at what point is it "legitimate discussion of impending hostilities".
And I for one, am very interested in how mods feel about this question.
edit for clarity in brackets
-
This post did not contain any content.
All just because Cuomo lost to a progressive candidate. Americans, please be fully aware what lengths Trump is willing to take for total control
-
Yeah I went bug eyed there for a sec as a fellow resident
"for a sec"
First they came for the communists, and I did not speak out - because I was not a communist;
Then they came for the socialists, and I did not speak out - because I was not a socialist;
Then they came for the trade unionists, and I did not speak out - because I was not a trade unionist;
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out - because I was not a Jew;
Then they came for me - and there was no one left to speak out for me.- Martin Niemöller, Holocaust survivor
Are you only willing to act once they are at your doorstep?
-
Fuck the mods
First off, to be clear, I don't agree with this statement, I think it's the wrong stance.
But after that, I think this is a really an interesting point. [In general I understand a policy of not inciting violence] but if for instance, (purely hypothetically) the country were to fall into civil war (a crazy suggestion I know), wouldn't this policy instantly seem inappropriate?
I mean, encouraging people to join the war effort would be a matter of course, to quash that sentiment and silence those voices seems unethical.
As we slip closer to that possible outcome, surely the time for seriously talking about violence would come before the first shot is fired, right? So where do you draw that line? At what point is a statement which incites violence "violating site rules" and at what point is it "legitimate discussion of impending hostilities".
And I for one, am very interested in how mods feel about this question.
edit for clarity in brackets
He means fuck the mods because they ban and delete comments that even hint at violence or Revolution, which only helps the oppressor. We are never going to get a better deal if every time we talk about getting mad, we get shut up and shut down.
It was a huge issue on Reddit and is becoming one here with the mods who just ban everyone who gets mad -
Fuck the mods!
Violence will be the only correct response if this is done.
Actively overturning an election bc the other party won, is a call to remove those in charge by any means.
Actively overturning an election bc the other party won
The election is in November ...
