Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Not The Onion
  3. Florida's plan to replace migrant workers with children falls apart

Florida's plan to replace migrant workers with children falls apart

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Not The Onion
nottheonion
110 Posts 84 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zoneA [email protected]

    So let me get this straight. The US needs Migrants so much that we're needing to replace them with teenagers?

    S This user is from outside of this forum
    S This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #90

    Now that you're saying. Really expected them to use actual 9 year old children for this. But even so, it doesn't look like a bright future if they're forcing adolescents and young adults into slavery.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L [email protected]

      On the same day this came out, University of Florida scientists announced a possible new treatment for cancer - not a type of cancer, ALL cancers. It works by stimulating the immune system to kill the tumor, and it's based on a treatment for glioblastoma that had highly successful human trials last year. Hard to believe these same two developments both came out of the nutbin of Florida.

      T This user is from outside of this forum
      T This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #91

      Here's an article for those who want to know more.

      1 Reply Last reply
      1
      • K [email protected]
        This post did not contain any content.
        M This user is from outside of this forum
        M This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #92

        Brand new sentence???!!!

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • J [email protected]

          That's a fair critique, I made it sound more like US citizens are snobby for rejecting underpaid, dangerous jobs when in reality the US's base infrastructure still entirely relies on a form of slave labor to persist. I should've been more nuanced with my description.

          B This user is from outside of this forum
          B This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #93

          It's not even a critique, really. We're all fed up, angry, and looking to throw around punches at everything. My comments are just as much about venting and getting mad.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Q [email protected]

            It's telling that they blame the migrants workers for "stealing the jerbs" instead of the businesses that hire migrants workers in order to get around paying a fair wage

            Why blame a white capitalist when anyone else can take the fall?

            F This user is from outside of this forum
            F This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #94

            Florida briefly tried to enforce it on this basis and immediately had a labor crisis so afaik they stopped.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L [email protected]

              On the same day this came out, University of Florida scientists announced a possible new treatment for cancer - not a type of cancer, ALL cancers. It works by stimulating the immune system to kill the tumor, and it's based on a treatment for glioblastoma that had highly successful human trials last year. Hard to believe these same two developments both came out of the nutbin of Florida.

              V This user is from outside of this forum
              V This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #95

              That happens like all the time, but they never work (yet!). Cancer is so agressive, dividing so fast, and thus adapting through mutations that nothing really works fully.

              But maybe it will kill some of them, and let's not stop trying! Fuck cancer.

              F 1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • A [email protected]

                See also: the troubled teen industry. Ir parenting is too much work, you can send your kid to torture school.

                vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.worksV This user is from outside of this forum
                vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.worksV This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #96

                Every last one of those places needs to be burned down, the staff and investors should be hanged.

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • K [email protected]
                  This post did not contain any content.
                  R This user is from outside of this forum
                  R This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #97

                  Newsweek states on their own website that this article is unfairly leaning left. What a strange editorial decision.

                  F 1 Reply Last reply
                  4
                  • F [email protected]

                    In ancent rome there was a law,that went something like "you cannot sell your son into slavery a third time". Americans would see that as a violation of parental rights

                    vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.worksV This user is from outside of this forum
                    vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.worksV This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #98

                    Third? The fuck did someone do to cause that?! Was there some dude who sold his son into slavery and then said son got out of slavery at least three times so the Romans had to pass a law to keep that from happening again? Why do I get the feeling Crassus was involved.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • V [email protected]

                      That happens like all the time, but they never work (yet!). Cancer is so agressive, dividing so fast, and thus adapting through mutations that nothing really works fully.

                      But maybe it will kill some of them, and let's not stop trying! Fuck cancer.

                      F This user is from outside of this forum
                      F This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by [email protected]
                      #99

                      It's mRNA based, if I recall.

                      This makes it, essentially, endlessly flexible. We can now take a sample, sequence it, find the mutations, simulate what the protein looks like when folded, generate* the correct complimentary protein for that target and write the actual amino acid sequence directly into mRNA and give it to the patient.

                      This is currently incredibly expensive because it's being done manually by labs full of PhDs. But every part of this process is being rapidly improved and made cheaper.

                      mRNA based medicines have amazing promise. For example they had the COVID vaccine designed less than 12 hours after sequencing the virus.

                      *using a diffusion model, like AI image generators but they produce amino acid sequences that generate arbitrarily shaped proteins

                      V 1 Reply Last reply
                      6
                      • R [email protected]

                        Newsweek states on their own website that this article is unfairly leaning left. What a strange editorial decision.

                        F This user is from outside of this forum
                        F This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by
                        #100

                        It's an unfortunately looking vote gauge (it's like a poll where readers decide whether it does lean on either side or not), not their opinion about the article.

                        R K 2 Replies Last reply
                        1
                        • F [email protected]

                          It's an unfortunately looking vote gauge (it's like a poll where readers decide whether it does lean on either side or not), not their opinion about the article.

                          R This user is from outside of this forum
                          R This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote last edited by
                          #101

                          Its a design decision that is bafflingly stupid. People will use this as evidence of bias.

                          F 1 Reply Last reply
                          3
                          • A [email protected]

                            They've already scrapped mandatory water breaks for outside workers 😞

                            A This user is from outside of this forum
                            A This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote last edited by
                            #102

                            So let’s make the jobs nobody wants to do even worse while we deport the few remaining people willing to do them.

                            Then try and get notoriously hard working and focused teenagers to do it.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • R [email protected]

                              Its a design decision that is bafflingly stupid. People will use this as evidence of bias.

                              F This user is from outside of this forum
                              F This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote last edited by
                              #103

                              That's how Newsweek works now.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              2
                              • F [email protected]

                                It's an unfortunately looking vote gauge (it's like a poll where readers decide whether it does lean on either side or not), not their opinion about the article.

                                K This user is from outside of this forum
                                K This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote last edited by
                                #104

                                yeah, it appears that they just took some generic gauge animation, in which arrows always tend to start on the left-hand side (think any of the gauges in your car.) Once you vote it does tell you that the most popular opinion is that it's center/fair

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • F [email protected]

                                  It's mRNA based, if I recall.

                                  This makes it, essentially, endlessly flexible. We can now take a sample, sequence it, find the mutations, simulate what the protein looks like when folded, generate* the correct complimentary protein for that target and write the actual amino acid sequence directly into mRNA and give it to the patient.

                                  This is currently incredibly expensive because it's being done manually by labs full of PhDs. But every part of this process is being rapidly improved and made cheaper.

                                  mRNA based medicines have amazing promise. For example they had the COVID vaccine designed less than 12 hours after sequencing the virus.

                                  *using a diffusion model, like AI image generators but they produce amino acid sequences that generate arbitrarily shaped proteins

                                  V This user is from outside of this forum
                                  V This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #105

                                  mRNA based stuff is indeed incredible, no more randomly just trying things out, it's really the future IMO.

                                  But for cancer it will just be a tool in the toolbox , I mean you gotta get those samples and cancer change maybe a thousand times a minute, which strain is the "bad" one? Etc. etc. etc.

                                  One theoretical way to stop cancer altogether would be to remove the possibility for telomere lengthening (remove the production of telomerase) and "manually" allow the growth of only stem cell from time to time.

                                  But that's a long time from now if ever it can be done.

                                  F 1 Reply Last reply
                                  2
                                  • L [email protected]

                                    On the same day this came out, University of Florida scientists announced a possible new treatment for cancer - not a type of cancer, ALL cancers. It works by stimulating the immune system to kill the tumor, and it's based on a treatment for glioblastoma that had highly successful human trials last year. Hard to believe these same two developments both came out of the nutbin of Florida.

                                    I This user is from outside of this forum
                                    I This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #106

                                    That is nothing new. Immunotherapies have been around for at least 10 years.

                                    M 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • V [email protected]

                                      mRNA based stuff is indeed incredible, no more randomly just trying things out, it's really the future IMO.

                                      But for cancer it will just be a tool in the toolbox , I mean you gotta get those samples and cancer change maybe a thousand times a minute, which strain is the "bad" one? Etc. etc. etc.

                                      One theoretical way to stop cancer altogether would be to remove the possibility for telomere lengthening (remove the production of telomerase) and "manually" allow the growth of only stem cell from time to time.

                                      But that's a long time from now if ever it can be done.

                                      F This user is from outside of this forum
                                      F This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #107

                                      Oh yeah, cancer is incredibility complex. I'm not remotely qualified to predict how this will be used.

                                      I'm on the tech side of things and the ability to read and write arbitrary amino acid sequences along with machine learning models trained to predict (ex: AlphaFold) and generate (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-45051-2) protein structures is absolutely mindblowing.

                                      It's like we've been working on computers by striking flint at their CPU and listening to the traces vibrate in order to interpret the output and now someone has figured out how to plug in a keyboard and monitor.

                                      We're barely scratching the surface with these techniques and we've found multiple ways to make an AIDS vaccine and we're discovering new ways to beat cancer. The rapid development of the COVID vaccine, thanks to mRNA, likely saved millions or tens of millions of people and prevented a global depression.

                                      It's such an incredible time for human advancement, it's a shame we're all drowning in social media fueled toxicity and people don't see it.

                                      V 1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • I [email protected]

                                        That is nothing new. Immunotherapies have been around for at least 10 years.

                                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #108

                                        Thanks, I had hope for a few seconds.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • F [email protected]

                                          Oh yeah, cancer is incredibility complex. I'm not remotely qualified to predict how this will be used.

                                          I'm on the tech side of things and the ability to read and write arbitrary amino acid sequences along with machine learning models trained to predict (ex: AlphaFold) and generate (https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-45051-2) protein structures is absolutely mindblowing.

                                          It's like we've been working on computers by striking flint at their CPU and listening to the traces vibrate in order to interpret the output and now someone has figured out how to plug in a keyboard and monitor.

                                          We're barely scratching the surface with these techniques and we've found multiple ways to make an AIDS vaccine and we're discovering new ways to beat cancer. The rapid development of the COVID vaccine, thanks to mRNA, likely saved millions or tens of millions of people and prevented a global depression.

                                          It's such an incredible time for human advancement, it's a shame we're all drowning in social media fueled toxicity and people don't see it.

                                          V This user is from outside of this forum
                                          V This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #109

                                          Yeah totally agree!

                                          I sometimes feel like I learned a lifetime of things, just to get it all thrown under the bus in the last 5-10 years, biological science is advancing so fast right now it's mind blowing.

                                          mRNA also might treat allergies and take on parts of the deadliest disease too, aging.

                                          Interesting times!

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups