The ol' Uno Reverse
-
Every morning I human traffic myself to work.
I mean... If it's somewhere you don't want to be...
-
It varies by country, but in south Africa for example, you don't have to prove emotional distress, the law is clear in stating that exposing someone to genitalia, anus or female breast without consent (provided it is deliberate) is an offense.
So you're right, but in some countries, you're more right than others.
Do infants consent to breast feeding? I’m sorry, I know you didn’t write the law
-
Link or it didn't happen
wrote last edited by [email protected]the post is from 2015 so good luck to find it
here is the post on the internet archive as a starting point:
https://web.archive.org/web/20170624194401/http://rarestandfairest.tumblr.com/post/115047018790/i-had-an-ex-boyfriend-threaten-to-publish-my-nudes -
I mean... If it's somewhere you don't want to be...
Plus you're usually getting fucked in some way.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote last edited by [email protected]
So... what did you say that link was?
-
So... what did you say that link was?
-
Breasts as well? That’s surprising. How accepted are trans people in South Africa? Because there might be some confusing times ahead.
wrote last edited by [email protected]I know you're making a bad faith argument, but I will answer anyway.
Trans people are accepted in south Africa, and offered many legal protections, including official recognition status of their preferred gender (there are certain prerequisites required to change your gender, but I don't know what those are, I just know people who have done so). Should someone undergo gender re-assignment, and have the gender changed on their ID, it would or would not be an offense based on what gender they have transitioned to at the time the incident had occurred.
South African law is pretty forward thinking in many aspects regarding discrimination, primarily because of how racial discrimination has massively featured in our history.
-
Do infants consent to breast feeding? I’m sorry, I know you didn’t write the law
I don't write the law, but for the sake of answering, consent is implicit in this case. Sexual offences must be sexual in nature, and breastfeeding is not sexual. So any mother breastfeeding her child in public would be exempt from prosecution of such a sexual offence. Many traditional ceremonies are also conducted in traditional attire whereby the woman are topless. This is also not regarded as sexual and anyone attending such an event must implicitly consent here as well.
Our law makes many provisions for the reasonable man. So if you happen to stumble upon a nude beach (official status or otherwise), and be exposed to a female breasts, it would not be unlawful as people on this beach reasonably expected the people there to have consented. You could be charged with other offences such as public indecency if official nude beach status is not granted at that beach, but it would not be a sexual offence. Also, the prosecutors would likely be hesitant to waste the courts time on that, and drop the case. So the cops would likely just ask you to cover up if a complaint is received.
Our law is pretty good in that regards, it's our police and investigative side that is over worked and under skilled, mixed with loads of socio economic issues, that result in overloaded courts and high crime rates that we have.
-
... publishing your own nudes is a sex crime?
wrote last edited by [email protected]No but adding unsubstantiated comments about how your ex wanted to post revenge porn about you probably is.
Edit: you can stop the down voting, I didn't pick up the part where she screenshotted his threats. Either way, be careful with that sort of vigilante justice as you might be right but still break the law.
-
No but adding unsubstantiated comments about how your ex wanted to post revenge porn about you probably is.
Edit: you can stop the down voting, I didn't pick up the part where she screenshotted his threats. Either way, be careful with that sort of vigilante justice as you might be right but still break the law.
If the quotes are screenshotted, it would be substantiated.
-
No but adding unsubstantiated comments about how your ex wanted to post revenge porn about you probably is.
Edit: you can stop the down voting, I didn't pick up the part where she screenshotted his threats. Either way, be careful with that sort of vigilante justice as you might be right but still break the law.
Sounds like the claims were pretty well 'substantiated' in this case...
-
I know you're making a bad faith argument, but I will answer anyway.
Trans people are accepted in south Africa, and offered many legal protections, including official recognition status of their preferred gender (there are certain prerequisites required to change your gender, but I don't know what those are, I just know people who have done so). Should someone undergo gender re-assignment, and have the gender changed on their ID, it would or would not be an offense based on what gender they have transitioned to at the time the incident had occurred.
South African law is pretty forward thinking in many aspects regarding discrimination, primarily because of how racial discrimination has massively featured in our history.
A bad faith argument? In what respect? The US is basically burning based on identity politics, so I’m curious about how beaches function after someone gets top surgery. In the US, many states don’t draw a legal distinction between male and female breasts whatsoever, mine included, which solves the bigotry either way.
-
I believe in you pug Jesus.
Just as the old adage goes - what would PugJesus do?
-
2008 called for you but they didn't leave a msg.
-
2008 called for you but they didn't leave a msg.
They should know I only communicate through MSN Messenger these days. Good thing it'll be around forever!
-
That’s like going full kamikaze, wrecking your opponent and somehow surviving the act.
they say if you're just confident enough, they just let you do it ...
-
To an audience that isn’t interested in seeing them, yeah. They require consent, otherwise it’s a sex crime not dissimilar to flashing. I can’t remember the specific term. Non-consensual something or other.
Edit: I still can’t remember but the word “brandishing” keeps hopping to the forefront of my mind, and brandishing tits sounds hilarious
wrote last edited by [email protected]you can just put your titties behind a nsfw tag / spoiler?
::: spoiler spoiler
like this
:::
-
2008 called for you but they didn't leave a msg.
hey now don’t stop these
I click on these because I like the song
-
While violation of social media ToS is possible, I find it difficult to believe that a court would regard the sex crime angle of publishing one's own photos online seriously. Otherwise anyone linking to their OF without asking for permission to send the link first would be a sex criminal.
if only laws had logic
minors have been charged with creating pedo porn from their own photos
-
This post did not contain any content.
This is someone who understands strategy. Quick! Promote them to a relevant position in their preferred industry!
