Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. World News
  3. Canadian Separatist says he discussed Alberta becoming 51st state with Trump administration officials

Canadian Separatist says he discussed Alberta becoming 51st state with Trump administration officials

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved World News
world
26 Posts 19 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N [email protected]

    Does separation (possibly via a referendum) fall into any of these cases?

    G This user is from outside of this forum
    G This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #17

    Not really, or at least not entirely. Here's a link that goes into some detail. It basically comes down to: referendums are fine and legal; secession has to be agreed to by the area leaving and the country as a whole; and subgroups of the region seceeding likely have the option to not seceed depending on their legal status. The Supreme Court has already determined that unilateral declarations of independence are unconstitutional in Canada, and I suspect the notwithstanding clause won't apply, either.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • D [email protected]

      https://www.desmog.com/2025/07/22/trump-officials-discussed-500m-alberta-independence-loan-separatist-claims/

      modernangel@sh.itjust.worksM This user is from outside of this forum
      modernangel@sh.itjust.worksM This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #18

      I know we're not supposed to judge a book by its cover but this guy looks like the kind of pedo grifter the regime is absolutely packed with

      1 Reply Last reply
      2
      • O [email protected]

        So... not treason?

        Whatever the legal definition, this guy should go straight to Yale

        N This user is from outside of this forum
        N This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by [email protected]
        #19

        How is this not treason? Are you American?

        I ask because even the most left leaning of you all keep making light of this shit and it's actually driving me crazy. I have American coworkers making 51st state jokes and it's actually making me hate all of you

        O 1 Reply Last reply
        2
        • O [email protected]

          (a) kills or attempts to kill Her Majesty, or does her any bodily harm tending to death or destruction, maims or wounds her, or imprisons or restrains her;

          So Charles is fair game?

          F This user is from outside of this forum
          F This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #20

          I was going to comment something similar. The law is still worded as "her majesty" when we now have a male monarch?

          1 Reply Last reply
          1
          • N [email protected]

            How is this not treason? Are you American?

            I ask because even the most left leaning of you all keep making light of this shit and it's actually driving me crazy. I have American coworkers making 51st state jokes and it's actually making me hate all of you

            O This user is from outside of this forum
            O This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #21

            Did you read the definition of treason? I don't see where they intersect

            C 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • D [email protected]

              https://www.desmog.com/2025/07/22/trump-officials-discussed-500m-alberta-independence-loan-separatist-claims/

              venus_ziegenfalle@feddit.orgV This user is from outside of this forum
              venus_ziegenfalle@feddit.orgV This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #22

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • O [email protected]

                Did you read the definition of treason? I don't see where they intersect

                C This user is from outside of this forum
                C This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #23

                What you don't see isn't a surprise to anyone but you.

                O 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C [email protected]

                  What you don't see isn't a surprise to anyone but you.

                  O This user is from outside of this forum
                  O This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #24

                  Ah, gotcha

                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • O [email protected]

                    Ah, gotcha

                    C This user is from outside of this forum
                    C This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #25

                    Bruh you asked me if I'd read the definition of treason under my own comment copy and pasting the defintion of treason.

                    Like if you wanted to dispute allegations of treason you shouldn't have lead with a washed up reddit dunk.

                    O 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • C [email protected]

                      Bruh you asked me if I'd read the definition of treason under my own comment copy and pasting the defintion of treason.

                      Like if you wanted to dispute allegations of treason you shouldn't have lead with a washed up reddit dunk.

                      O This user is from outside of this forum
                      O This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #26

                      Okay smart guy, quote the section you think makes this treason.

                      I don't give a fuck who posted it, I read it, I don't so where this action and that definition meet. So put up or fuck off

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups