Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Ask Lemmy
  3. Setting downvote thresholds to hide low quality content?

Setting downvote thresholds to hide low quality content?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Ask Lemmy
asklemmy
15 Posts 8 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Z [email protected]

    Is there still no way to have your feeds filtered to not show any posts with a score below a certain threshold? This is particularly of interest for posts with negative scores. This was a basic feature on Reddit, and it's something I can't believe Lemmy is still lacking. So maybe I've missed it somehow?

    This would make community moderation much better as low quality content could be easily hidden from user's feeds without need of intervention from a mod. When I see a post with a negative 50 score it boggles my mind why my time was wasted in seeing it at all.

    I've looked all through the settings in the web UI and in Voyager and have not found a way to enable this. Any ideas? Do maybe other apps have that ability?

    admiralpatrick@lemmy.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
    admiralpatrick@lemmy.worldA This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by [email protected]
    #2

    It doesn't now, but I'd be willing to add that to Tesseract. Seems easy enough to implement.

    Edit: It's not fully plumbed in yet, but the settings to configure it have been added to the filter policy framework. Will probably also do a similar setting for comments. Shown enabled here, but disabled by default, naturally.

    Edit 2: Plumbed in and working now in the dev build. Can also completely hide those, but that doesn't exactly work for a screenshot.

    Z 1 Reply Last reply
    4
    • Z [email protected]

      Is there still no way to have your feeds filtered to not show any posts with a score below a certain threshold? This is particularly of interest for posts with negative scores. This was a basic feature on Reddit, and it's something I can't believe Lemmy is still lacking. So maybe I've missed it somehow?

      This would make community moderation much better as low quality content could be easily hidden from user's feeds without need of intervention from a mod. When I see a post with a negative 50 score it boggles my mind why my time was wasted in seeing it at all.

      I've looked all through the settings in the web UI and in Voyager and have not found a way to enable this. Any ideas? Do maybe other apps have that ability?

      I This user is from outside of this forum
      I This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by [email protected]
      #3

      I wouldn't mind if it's opt-in.

      I certainly don't want the average internet user having any more control over what I see than they unfortunately already have.

      Z 1 Reply Last reply
      4
      • Z [email protected]

        Is there still no way to have your feeds filtered to not show any posts with a score below a certain threshold? This is particularly of interest for posts with negative scores. This was a basic feature on Reddit, and it's something I can't believe Lemmy is still lacking. So maybe I've missed it somehow?

        This would make community moderation much better as low quality content could be easily hidden from user's feeds without need of intervention from a mod. When I see a post with a negative 50 score it boggles my mind why my time was wasted in seeing it at all.

        I've looked all through the settings in the web UI and in Voyager and have not found a way to enable this. Any ideas? Do maybe other apps have that ability?

        sethrankada@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
        sethrankada@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #4

        I agree, that does seem like a useful feature, though I hadn't thought of it before. Thanks for sharing the idea, hopefully someone important noticed.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • Z [email protected]

          Is there still no way to have your feeds filtered to not show any posts with a score below a certain threshold? This is particularly of interest for posts with negative scores. This was a basic feature on Reddit, and it's something I can't believe Lemmy is still lacking. So maybe I've missed it somehow?

          This would make community moderation much better as low quality content could be easily hidden from user's feeds without need of intervention from a mod. When I see a post with a negative 50 score it boggles my mind why my time was wasted in seeing it at all.

          I've looked all through the settings in the web UI and in Voyager and have not found a way to enable this. Any ideas? Do maybe other apps have that ability?

          M This user is from outside of this forum
          M This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #5

          By low quality do you mean any unpopular opinions ?

          Z 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Z [email protected]

            Is there still no way to have your feeds filtered to not show any posts with a score below a certain threshold? This is particularly of interest for posts with negative scores. This was a basic feature on Reddit, and it's something I can't believe Lemmy is still lacking. So maybe I've missed it somehow?

            This would make community moderation much better as low quality content could be easily hidden from user's feeds without need of intervention from a mod. When I see a post with a negative 50 score it boggles my mind why my time was wasted in seeing it at all.

            I've looked all through the settings in the web UI and in Voyager and have not found a way to enable this. Any ideas? Do maybe other apps have that ability?

            alecsargent@lemmy.zipA This user is from outside of this forum
            alecsargent@lemmy.zipA This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #6

            I think hiding that posts should not be the default. Maybe the moderator could get notified if the posts surpases the threshold and perhaps some sort of indicator for the posts so that clients can manage them to preference(hide or give a warning).

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • I [email protected]

              I wouldn't mind if it's opt-in.

              I certainly don't want the average internet user having any more control over what I see than they unfortunately already have.

              Z This user is from outside of this forum
              Z This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #7

              Oh yeah. It would be fully optional and user configurable ideally. On Reddit you could enter any number you wanted. I usually kept mine set on -2 back in the day

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • admiralpatrick@lemmy.worldA [email protected]

                It doesn't now, but I'd be willing to add that to Tesseract. Seems easy enough to implement.

                Edit: It's not fully plumbed in yet, but the settings to configure it have been added to the filter policy framework. Will probably also do a similar setting for comments. Shown enabled here, but disabled by default, naturally.

                Edit 2: Plumbed in and working now in the dev build. Can also completely hide those, but that doesn't exactly work for a screenshot.

                Z This user is from outside of this forum
                Z This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #8

                Very nice!

                1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • M [email protected]

                  By low quality do you mean any unpopular opinions ?

                  Z This user is from outside of this forum
                  Z This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #9

                  I mean like when people post pseudoscience to a science community or something that's completely off topic. Or maybe a poor stick figure being submitted to an art community. The community voting filter is integral, and if you don't like it you should just use Mastodon rather than Lemmy

                  M 1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • Z [email protected]

                    I mean like when people post pseudoscience to a science community or something that's completely off topic. Or maybe a poor stick figure being submitted to an art community. The community voting filter is integral, and if you don't like it you should just use Mastodon rather than Lemmy

                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by [email protected]
                    #10

                    Is every unpopular opinions about something serious as giving psuedoscience trash?

                    Denying scientific science or saying uncientific science is not opinions it's objectively false claims

                    Z 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • M [email protected]

                      Is every unpopular opinions about something serious as giving psuedoscience trash?

                      Denying scientific science or saying uncientific science is not opinions it's objectively false claims

                      Z This user is from outside of this forum
                      Z This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #11

                      If you don't vibe with what's popular in your community, maybe you should find a different community. That's the beauty of the fediverse

                      M 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • Z [email protected]

                        If you don't vibe with what's popular in your community, maybe you should find a different community. That's the beauty of the fediverse

                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        M This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by
                        #12

                        That's whst we call trying to create echo chambers. I don't want that

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • Z [email protected]

                          Is there still no way to have your feeds filtered to not show any posts with a score below a certain threshold? This is particularly of interest for posts with negative scores. This was a basic feature on Reddit, and it's something I can't believe Lemmy is still lacking. So maybe I've missed it somehow?

                          This would make community moderation much better as low quality content could be easily hidden from user's feeds without need of intervention from a mod. When I see a post with a negative 50 score it boggles my mind why my time was wasted in seeing it at all.

                          I've looked all through the settings in the web UI and in Voyager and have not found a way to enable this. Any ideas? Do maybe other apps have that ability?

                          interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zoneI This user is from outside of this forum
                          interstellar_1@lemmy.blahaj.zoneI This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote last edited by
                          #13

                          Pretty sure that's a thing on piefed

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • Z [email protected]

                            Is there still no way to have your feeds filtered to not show any posts with a score below a certain threshold? This is particularly of interest for posts with negative scores. This was a basic feature on Reddit, and it's something I can't believe Lemmy is still lacking. So maybe I've missed it somehow?

                            This would make community moderation much better as low quality content could be easily hidden from user's feeds without need of intervention from a mod. When I see a post with a negative 50 score it boggles my mind why my time was wasted in seeing it at all.

                            I've looked all through the settings in the web UI and in Voyager and have not found a way to enable this. Any ideas? Do maybe other apps have that ability?

                            P This user is from outside of this forum
                            P This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote last edited by [email protected]
                            #14

                            I requested this (user configurable threshold options added) on Boost a few months ago, don't know if it's going to be put in.

                            Why is this idea down voted?

                            Z 1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • P [email protected]

                              I requested this (user configurable threshold options added) on Boost a few months ago, don't know if it's going to be put in.

                              Why is this idea down voted?

                              Z This user is from outside of this forum
                              Z This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote last edited by
                              #15

                              A good number of Lemmy users seem to not understand the value of the voting system. Perhaps over a fear of brigading. I don't know, makes zero sense to me

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups