From Snoop Dogg to Lap Dogg
-
This post did not contain any content.
Snoop turned into a fucking pussy.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I recognize this is a meme, but is there an actual citation on where and when he said this? I want to hate him for it, but I also want to do my due diligence.
-
That movie is set way in the future and the baby looks like both of the mothers. I don't think it was an adoption, I think the assumption is that they somehow figured out a way to have 2 women have a baby together with both of their DNA in the future. I watched it with my kid n kinda thought huh, that's a bit of an odd choice, but my kids didn't ask, and frankly I didn't care. The movie was shit though, and this tiny, weird bit of plot was irrelevant to it sucking. The decision to replace the voice actor for Buzz was super annoying. He just sounded wrong and the movie was fucking space groundhog day but worse.
That movie is set way in the future and the baby looks like both of the mothers.
Sperm banks stock from a variety of ethnic backgrounds and etc to enable this; sometimes they use donor material from siblings on the non ... Directy involved partner for the same reason
-
This post did not contain any content.
So he's done like a reverse MC Hammer. From OG to PG.
-
This post did not contain any content.
What a weak man.
-
That movie is set way in the future and the baby looks like both of the mothers. I don't think it was an adoption, I think the assumption is that they somehow figured out a way to have 2 women have a baby together with both of their DNA in the future. I watched it with my kid n kinda thought huh, that's a bit of an odd choice, but my kids didn't ask, and frankly I didn't care. The movie was shit though, and this tiny, weird bit of plot was irrelevant to it sucking. The decision to replace the voice actor for Buzz was super annoying. He just sounded wrong and the movie was fucking space groundhog day but worse.
We have the technology to do this now, it's just not widely used.
-
I recognize this is a meme, but is there an actual citation on where and when he said this? I want to hate him for it, but I also want to do my due diligence.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote last edited by [email protected]
It's wild to me that someone who got rich selling songs to teens about fucking bitches, selling drugs and killing cops could keep a straight have (edit: face! Straight face!) while saying he's offended about anything.
-
This post did not contain any content.
This thread seems so triggered.
He's not expressing an uncommon opinion. Lots of parents/grandparents dislike overtly lgbtq+ content in kid-focused media, because it results in kids asking questions the adults aren't prepared / comfortable answering. They're basically just saying that discussing "adult" relationships is an "adult" topic, and shouldn't be something coming about as a result of a little kid movie.
-
It's wild to me that someone who got rich selling songs to teens about fucking bitches, selling drugs and killing cops could keep a straight have (edit: face! Straight face!) while saying he's offended about anything.
Surely, scary topics that must never be mentioned!
-
This thread seems so triggered.
He's not expressing an uncommon opinion. Lots of parents/grandparents dislike overtly lgbtq+ content in kid-focused media, because it results in kids asking questions the adults aren't prepared / comfortable answering. They're basically just saying that discussing "adult" relationships is an "adult" topic, and shouldn't be something coming about as a result of a little kid movie.
I don't give a fuck if they don't "like" it. They have zero problem exposing kids to heterosexual relationships.
What's "triggered" about opposing that illogical, hypocritical bullshit?
-
He made adult music knowing it would be listened to by children. At some point in his career he must have realized he was talking directly to children while in the studio.
I'm sure he cares about kids and isn't just a stupid asshole saying a line because something pulled his string.
~You got a stick in your ass, Snoop!~
He made adult music knowing it would be listened to by children.
Snoop deserves criticism for this and his Trump inauguration appearance, but this is a deeply stupid criticism that can be made about literally any entertainer.
-
People forget that snoop dogg is actually a theatre kid who wanted to play the part of piece of shit gangster, and ended up with a murder charge. He then used memes and people on the internet to make himself a figure of memes and good guy propaganda. I don’t think he’s awful but he’s not the nice guy that internet fanboys portray him as
wrote last edited by [email protected]"Good guy"? We just knew him as an occasional musician and mega-stoner. Not many people calling him an actual hero.
-
From the inventor Deez Nutz.
you wanna buy some CDs?
-
This thread seems so triggered.
He's not expressing an uncommon opinion. Lots of parents/grandparents dislike overtly lgbtq+ content in kid-focused media, because it results in kids asking questions the adults aren't prepared / comfortable answering. They're basically just saying that discussing "adult" relationships is an "adult" topic, and shouldn't be something coming about as a result of a little kid movie.
Lazy troll
You sound triggered
Pretending that depicting relationships in movies is "adult" content is some really cringe ass behavior, and it isn't how adults actually act unless they have serious issues with bigotry.
-
it's not condemnation, it's pointing out hypocrisy.
wrote last edited by [email protected]I don't know if hypocrisy is the right term. Maybe in an extremely broad sense but then it starts to lose its meaning.
-
Broadly it might not be worthy of condemnation, but in the context of "child appropriate" it would seem to be way less appropriate than what he is complaining about.
I think Snoop is being a dumbass here (like I did when he went to Trump's inauguration party) but this is a bad argument. He didn't make the music for young children.
-
Hypocrisy is the defining feature of our age.
Wouldn't it only be hypocrisy if the issues in question were more closely related? Like if, in the past, Snoop had two women making out in a music video or something. But even that wouldn't have been intended for kids.
Not defending, his stance is asinine.
-
I don't give a fuck if they don't "like" it. They have zero problem exposing kids to heterosexual relationships.
What's "triggered" about opposing that illogical, hypocritical bullshit?
If you put a bunch of hard core BDSM content into a movie for kids, it'd be considered inappropriate. Even if the BDSM community argued we have 'no problem' exposing kids to other kinds of relationships. It'd prompt similar uncomfortable questions for adults, and I reckon could lead to negative interactions that could damage the parent/child relationship.
No matter how you spin it, lgbtq+ gender stuff is abnormal, and applies to a relatively small minority of people in the overall population. Forcing those conversations onto hetero couples is inappropriate. Children of lgbtq+ couples may/can have those conversations earlier, as their households will likely encounter the questions regardless -- just like a family of hard core BDSM practitioners would need to explain to their kids why mommy and daddy have a dungeon in the basement. That doesn't mean every kid, and every family, should go through the same crap. Especially if, as a non-member of that community, your response will almost definitely be "wrong" according to that community.
-
Damnit.
Now I have to not go out of my way and keep Snoop on the list of people's political opinions that I don't give a single fuck about.
Yeah, he wasn't who I was looking to for political takes, lol. Now if I need someone to show me how to smoke 10 blunts, that's different.
