From Snoop Dogg to Lap Dogg
-
People forget that snoop dogg is actually a theatre kid who wanted to play the part of piece of shit gangster, and ended up with a murder charge. He then used memes and people on the internet to make himself a figure of memes and good guy propaganda. I don’t think he’s awful but he’s not the nice guy that internet fanboys portray him as
wrote last edited by [email protected]"Good guy"? We just knew him as an occasional musician and mega-stoner. Not many people calling him an actual hero.
-
From the inventor Deez Nutz.
you wanna buy some CDs?
-
This thread seems so triggered.
He's not expressing an uncommon opinion. Lots of parents/grandparents dislike overtly lgbtq+ content in kid-focused media, because it results in kids asking questions the adults aren't prepared / comfortable answering. They're basically just saying that discussing "adult" relationships is an "adult" topic, and shouldn't be something coming about as a result of a little kid movie.
Lazy troll
You sound triggered
Pretending that depicting relationships in movies is "adult" content is some really cringe ass behavior, and it isn't how adults actually act unless they have serious issues with bigotry.
-
it's not condemnation, it's pointing out hypocrisy.
wrote last edited by [email protected]I don't know if hypocrisy is the right term. Maybe in an extremely broad sense but then it starts to lose its meaning.
-
Broadly it might not be worthy of condemnation, but in the context of "child appropriate" it would seem to be way less appropriate than what he is complaining about.
I think Snoop is being a dumbass here (like I did when he went to Trump's inauguration party) but this is a bad argument. He didn't make the music for young children.
-
Hypocrisy is the defining feature of our age.
Wouldn't it only be hypocrisy if the issues in question were more closely related? Like if, in the past, Snoop had two women making out in a music video or something. But even that wouldn't have been intended for kids.
Not defending, his stance is asinine.
-
I don't give a fuck if they don't "like" it. They have zero problem exposing kids to heterosexual relationships.
What's "triggered" about opposing that illogical, hypocritical bullshit?
If you put a bunch of hard core BDSM content into a movie for kids, it'd be considered inappropriate. Even if the BDSM community argued we have 'no problem' exposing kids to other kinds of relationships. It'd prompt similar uncomfortable questions for adults, and I reckon could lead to negative interactions that could damage the parent/child relationship.
No matter how you spin it, lgbtq+ gender stuff is abnormal, and applies to a relatively small minority of people in the overall population. Forcing those conversations onto hetero couples is inappropriate. Children of lgbtq+ couples may/can have those conversations earlier, as their households will likely encounter the questions regardless -- just like a family of hard core BDSM practitioners would need to explain to their kids why mommy and daddy have a dungeon in the basement. That doesn't mean every kid, and every family, should go through the same crap. Especially if, as a non-member of that community, your response will almost definitely be "wrong" according to that community.
-
Damnit.
Now I have to not go out of my way and keep Snoop on the list of people's political opinions that I don't give a single fuck about.
Yeah, he wasn't who I was looking to for political takes, lol. Now if I need someone to show me how to smoke 10 blunts, that's different.
-
There are many kinds of whores. Snoop is the fascist kind
Why? He wasn't paid to say this stupid shit.
-
Grandpa why are your eyes so red?
wrote last edited by [email protected]Grandson, listen close as I impart this important wisdom I've accumulated in my time
Smoke weed everyday.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Snoop Dogg teaching morals... I didn't see this one coming
-
The vast majority are, it's not a secret.
-
This post did not contain any content.
From 187 on a cop to blue lives matter.
-
If you put a bunch of hard core BDSM content into a movie for kids, it'd be considered inappropriate. Even if the BDSM community argued we have 'no problem' exposing kids to other kinds of relationships. It'd prompt similar uncomfortable questions for adults, and I reckon could lead to negative interactions that could damage the parent/child relationship.
No matter how you spin it, lgbtq+ gender stuff is abnormal, and applies to a relatively small minority of people in the overall population. Forcing those conversations onto hetero couples is inappropriate. Children of lgbtq+ couples may/can have those conversations earlier, as their households will likely encounter the questions regardless -- just like a family of hard core BDSM practitioners would need to explain to their kids why mommy and daddy have a dungeon in the basement. That doesn't mean every kid, and every family, should go through the same crap. Especially if, as a non-member of that community, your response will almost definitely be "wrong" according to that community.
Bad faith argument. Equating two people that spend their lives together to an exclusively sexual kink is bunk. Grow up.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Snoop Dogg? More like Whiny Lil Bitchass Dogg
-
Hero to zero, dude.
Dude was never a hero. I bet he secretly wishes he was half as cool as Eminem
-
Why? He wasn't paid to say this stupid shit.
Essentially he was. This is him saying I have no moral threshold and am available as an influencer to say and do whatever I am paid for. AKA I am still relevant to your agenda... Call me. It is the same as all the big tech CEOs bending to 47 after bending to diversity initiatives. People with no ethics or morals fly the banner of whomever has control and do so in ways the average person is far too stupid to process. 47 is hard pressed for black and minority supporters. For a leader of dogmatic tribal fools, aka an influencer, the vacuum of minority supporters for 47 is an open bounty for a very large paycheck in exchange for ethics especially in the Southeastern USA where any sway over potential Democratic voters is critical for the fascist republican agenda. Nothing is simple or straight forward when a person is at this level of political engagement and wealth.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Have fun performing those minstrel shows for your GOP leash holders, Toby…
-
This post did not contain any content.
Sounds like the bitchy ass dogg became the new anti-drug mascot:
"Drugs will make you so dumb you'll get scared of children asking questions"I mean, adoption? Wuzzat??? Izzit possibl?????
-
Bad faith argument. Equating two people that spend their lives together to an exclusively sexual kink is bunk. Grow up.
It's an abnormal relationship type with a dom and a sub. Just like homosexual relationships are abnormal relationships with non standard partners involved. One is just more abnormal than the other. Both raise questions about sex, as was the point with Snoops clip -- his kid explicitly asked about sex stuff, because he encountered the abnormal couple on screen. Snoop wasn't comfortable discussing that with his grandkid in a movie theatre, and felt put out. That's a valid response, no matter how many lgbtq+ people scream in nonsensical rage.
You may not like the point, but it doesn't make it invalid. Just like you may not like hetero people's reaction to homosexual content in kids media, but that doesn't make their reactions "wrong".
