why aren't we funding this....
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote last edited by [email protected]
Sooo... is this image copyright infringement?
There are just so many weird cases, based on the wording. Would Youtube need to scan for Danes within all uploads to check for copyright violations? Which is obviously impossible.
-
Sooo... is this image copyright infringement?
There are just so many weird cases, based on the wording. Would Youtube need to scan for Danes within all uploads to check for copyright violations? Which is obviously impossible.
Also, how many times have you seen a photo of someone that looks just like someone else that is entirely unrelated? Old photos in particular.
-
Sooo... is this image copyright infringement?
There are just so many weird cases, based on the wording. Would Youtube need to scan for Danes within all uploads to check for copyright violations? Which is obviously impossible.
I'd figure the scenario would be that YouTube would need to respect takedown request from people whose likeness had been appropriated, which isn't that absurd
-
Sooo... is this image copyright infringement?
There are just so many weird cases, based on the wording. Would Youtube need to scan for Danes within all uploads to check for copyright violations? Which is obviously impossible.
wrote last edited by [email protected]IMO, better to get consumer protection laws in place early and refine them over time, than not at all.
The longer these things wait, the more time corpos have to get their influence in and either stop the efforts or water them down to be entirely ineffective.
Edit:
Don't forget to read about it.
https://www.globallawtoday.com/law/legal-news/2025/06/denmarks-groundbreaking-move-copyright-for-faces-and-voices/ -
Sooo... is this image copyright infringement?
There are just so many weird cases, based on the wording. Would Youtube need to scan for Danes within all uploads to check for copyright violations? Which is obviously impossible.
I'm sure Youtube could figure it out, they do with music.
-
This post did not contain any content.
You would think that would be a given, but here we are in this timeline
-
I'm sure Youtube could figure it out, they do with music.
Danish music?
-
This post did not contain any content.
In the U.S. the rights to our face, voice, and body will be available to us for a monthly subscription fee.
-
You would think that would be a given, but here we are in this timeline
At least in Germany it has been a thing for decades. It's called "Recht am eigenen Bild" - "right to your own image". Meaning nobody can just take a photo or recording of you and post it online or use it in advertising or so without your approval.
-
Danish music?
-
This post did not contain any content.
Pretty sure we don't even own our DNA.
-
I'd figure the scenario would be that YouTube would need to respect takedown request from people whose likeness had been appropriated, which isn't that absurd
That's likely, but that would only help with the most viral cases. Otherwise, what's even the chance to come across AI generated content violating your copyright in an exponentially growing ocean of slop?
On the flipside, individuals could probably maliciously claim ad revenue. That's already a thing with music.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Having the RIGHTS to our Own Bodies? That sounds like SOCIALISM!
-People who SUPPORT the Government buying a Stake in Intel!
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote last edited by [email protected]
Didn't that already exist as the right to one's own image?
At least here in Spain such righ is mentioned in section 18.1 of the the Constitution from 1978 and was developed by a law in 1982 banning the capture, reproduction, use or publication by photograph, film, or any other means of a person's voice or image.
I would expect similar laws to exist in other countries. Having control of your own image and not allowing anyome to take your voice and image and make their own public use of them seems like a pretty basic right to not be regulated already before GenAI appeared.
Actually, targeting it just to GenAI and framing it as intellectual property or copyright sounds quite limited. Do you mean that as long as I don't use it for GenAI or use it for purposes not covered by copyright I can still publicly use your image in Denmark? I wouldn't expect so. The right one's own image is rooted in human dignity, privacy, and autonomy, which go beyond what a copyright law can protect.
-
In the U.S. the rights to our face, voice, and body will be available to us for a monthly subscription fee.
Just a license to the rights.
-
Just a license to the rights.
Sorry, that is unavailable now
-
Danish music?
Its mostly heavy metal
-
This post did not contain any content.
Scarlet Witch is so hot
-
This post did not contain any content.
Copyright only applies to created works. Wouldn't the owner of the copyright to you be...your parents?
