Too soon?
-
Violence in response to speech is not a good thing for a liberal society. If one side of politics does it the other will be forced to respond on the same level.
Yeah, people love to complain about authoritarianism. Then those same people cheer murder of political rivals...
It's not a road we should go down, and certainly not one we should cheer on.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Maybe just a bit, although there's been at least a dozen other memes so far.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Charlie might say not soon enough! Curious…
-
Violence in response to speech is not a good thing for a liberal society. If one side of politics does it the other will be forced to respond on the same level.
We don't live in a liberal society anymore.
-
Yeah, people love to complain about authoritarianism. Then those same people cheer murder of political rivals...
It's not a road we should go down, and certainly not one we should cheer on.
I mean, there’s a certain level of schadenfreude to enjoy when the stokers of hate and stochastic terrorism, social murder, get killed. They’re coming for us regardless, Si vis pacem, para bellum. If sandy hook couldn’t cause these ghouls to reflect and change, you know they lust for this future, because they are authoritarians through and through. They want to be the lords sitting on top of the machine of the economy grinding through the bodies of the plebs
-
This post did not contain any content.
They may be a pain, but they are a necessary one to protect our God given rights. /j
-
Fancy way of justifying violence against speech. You are the problem.
-
Fancy way of justifying violence against speech. You are the problem.
Speech calling for violence is a problem you say? Do tell me more
-
We don't live in a liberal society anymore.
That’s my goal, I want to live in a progressive society
-
This post did not contain any content.
Looks to me like his mind was changed.
-
This post did not contain any content.
That's not Charlie Kirk, is it ?
-
Violence in response to speech is not a good thing for a liberal society. If one side of politics does it the other will be forced to respond on the same level.
Did you change accounts? My right-wing nut tag seems to have fallen off you
Don't worry though, I've reattached it to its proper place
-
Violence in response to speech is not a good thing for a liberal society. If one side of politics does it the other will be forced to respond on the same level.
Good because "liberal" society is social murder
-
That's not Charlie Kirk, is it ?
Steven Crowder
-
This post did not contain any content.
Wait, has the guy in the meme been Charlie Kirk the whole time??
-
Wait, has the guy in the meme been Charlie Kirk the whole time??
Now thats steven crowder different asshole same look
-
Fancy way of justifying violence against speech. You are the problem.
spent his life fomenting hate and devaluing human life for laughs.
dies as worthlessly as he lived, in front of a screaming terrified audience who just will never understand why everyone got so crazy.
rest in skibidi, sweet prince
-
Yeah, people love to complain about authoritarianism. Then those same people cheer murder of political rivals...
It's not a road we should go down, and certainly not one we should cheer on.
If he was just someone with shitty opinions then I really wouldn't care. If he was just a loudmouth that said shitty things then I still wouldn't really care; then a knuckle sandwich would be enough.
It's that he has used all his privilege, time, money, and talent almost exclusively to demean, harass, and destroy innocent lives through social murder conducted by the administration he helped put into power twice.
He was a murderer up there with the likes of John Wayne Gacy, frankly with a body count orders of magnitude higher, for his Zionism alone, even if his transphobia, sexism, racism, classism, and fascism were neglected.
In the end, he deserved way the fuck worse, but I'll take what I can get.
-
Violence in response to speech is not a good thing for a liberal society. If one side of politics does it the other will be forced to respond on the same level.
eat shit and take your fuckin fascist Aussie mummy back, we don't need him or his shitty fascist network.
-
If he was just someone with shitty opinions then I really wouldn't care. If he was just a loudmouth that said shitty things then I still wouldn't really care; then a knuckle sandwich would be enough.
It's that he has used all his privilege, time, money, and talent almost exclusively to demean, harass, and destroy innocent lives through social murder conducted by the administration he helped put into power twice.
He was a murderer up there with the likes of John Wayne Gacy, frankly with a body count orders of magnitude higher, for his Zionism alone, even if his transphobia, sexism, racism, classism, and fascism were neglected.
In the end, he deserved way the fuck worse, but I'll take what I can get.
