Sora AI Slop is here
-
I dislike every Sora short I see. I don't dislike most videos.
That's engagement.
-
:: context ::
https://piefed.social/post/1348319
Not the user fault. Someone used some blur effect to hide the watermark, probably with Filmora or a similar editor. This is what the future looks like: Blurred or strangely zoomed ai slop video to hide watermarks.
probable source: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DPg7qkLEzK-/ (check the comments)
reported
-
damn this is the first time I got genuinely tricked by an ai video.
feels bad
I got tricked too. Knew it would happen eventually. Even if theyre not perfect im not thoroughly analyzing every 5 seconds long funny video. I hate this timeline.
-
I dislike every Sora short I see. I don't dislike most videos.
wrote last edited by [email protected]As long as you don’t interact with the video in any way, because using the like/dislike button and leaving comments of any kind are considered to be engagement and only cause the algorithm to recommend it all the more.
-
I saw a similar video but with a raccoon instead. Wow, I wonder if that was AI as well, or if it was the original this one was patterned after.
That might be why this one is so convincing? If it's just slightly altering instead of inventing whole cloth
-
damn this is the first time I got genuinely tricked by an ai video.
feels bad
AI slop is getting shockingly accurate.
I hope it'll destroy our climate really quikckly so big AI won't be able to make it accurately reflect reality!!
-
:: context ::
https://piefed.social/post/1348319
Not the user fault. Someone used some blur effect to hide the watermark, probably with Filmora or a similar editor. This is what the future looks like: Blurred or strangely zoomed ai slop video to hide watermarks.
probable source: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DPg7qkLEzK-/ (check the comments)
-
:: context ::
https://piefed.social/post/1348319
Not the user fault. Someone used some blur effect to hide the watermark, probably with Filmora or a similar editor. This is what the future looks like: Blurred or strangely zoomed ai slop video to hide watermarks.
probable source: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DPg7qkLEzK-/ (check the comments)
wrote last edited by [email protected]There is a group of idiots that will down vote anything related to AI without thought, then bitch and moan in the comments about it on top of it.
If you want people to properly tag their stuff, they need to think it's not going to get down voted and harrassed just because of the tag. I tag mine anyways (I don't really post much tbh) but I understand why people don't.
The knee jerk reaction of certain members of this community is encouraging hidding the fact that it is AI.
Also, if you like something but change your mind just because you learned it was made the "bad" way, when it's only stupid memes and quirky videos, you are a tool.
-
:: context ::
https://piefed.social/post/1348319
Not the user fault. Someone used some blur effect to hide the watermark, probably with Filmora or a similar editor. This is what the future looks like: Blurred or strangely zoomed ai slop video to hide watermarks.
probable source: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DPg7qkLEzK-/ (check the comments)
Ugh… it could be because I’m a bit groggy but nothing about the video seemed off to me right away. I didn’t even notice the blurred watermark. After looking closely, the Halloween animatronic has 6 fingers on one hand, the area of the animatronic behind the table looks very flatly colored, and the progression of the timer in the top left is not sensical.
Those who did right away notice the video was AI, what stood out to you? I feel like we may need teams of people pointing out suspicious aspects of internet content in the future, but at the efficiency that AI content is generated we might just end up finding ourselves automating the detection process with AI scanners trained to analyze for AI content.
-
damn this is the first time I got genuinely tricked by an ai video.
feels bad
Woe will be the day when humans can no longer determine whether a video is AI or not, even after careful analysis. I wouldn't have caught this one either but if given the fact that it is suspected of AI, it isn't hard to prove it. The timestamp in the top left corner is off. 22-13-43-21 is a nonsensical date and the time jumps from 23:15:07 to 23:15:98 then 23:15:59 then 23:15:54
-
Ugh… it could be because I’m a bit groggy but nothing about the video seemed off to me right away. I didn’t even notice the blurred watermark. After looking closely, the Halloween animatronic has 6 fingers on one hand, the area of the animatronic behind the table looks very flatly colored, and the progression of the timer in the top left is not sensical.
Those who did right away notice the video was AI, what stood out to you? I feel like we may need teams of people pointing out suspicious aspects of internet content in the future, but at the efficiency that AI content is generated we might just end up finding ourselves automating the detection process with AI scanners trained to analyze for AI content.
Been in video production for 30 years. We cannot rely on spotting problems to identify AI video. Selective attention alone means we miss major details in traditional video. Streaming services are testing AI upscaling, adding AI artifacts to pre-AI media. I regularly see comments pointing out artifacts from other sources (interlacing, morph cuts, moire, stabilization, compression, data moshing, etc) as evidence that the video is AI generated.
-
Been in video production for 30 years. We cannot rely on spotting problems to identify AI video. Selective attention alone means we miss major details in traditional video. Streaming services are testing AI upscaling, adding AI artifacts to pre-AI media. I regularly see comments pointing out artifacts from other sources (interlacing, morph cuts, moire, stabilization, compression, data moshing, etc) as evidence that the video is AI generated.
Oh yeah I definitely didn’t expect any automated AI detection system to be as accurate as a trained human, but I expect corporations to replace the trained humans in the long run to save money and increase rate of output at the great expense of the quality of the output. To get correct results, we’d need a platoon of Captain Disillusions, not just some Joe Schmoe or Robo Joe Schmoe.
-
:: context ::
https://piefed.social/post/1348319
Not the user fault. Someone used some blur effect to hide the watermark, probably with Filmora or a similar editor. This is what the future looks like: Blurred or strangely zoomed ai slop video to hide watermarks.
probable source: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DPg7qkLEzK-/ (check the comments)
Rather impressive how well made the video looks at first glance. Only the timestamp reveals its artificial, but I'm sure enough plays and sleuthing you'll see other minor details.
-
There is a group of idiots that will down vote anything related to AI without thought, then bitch and moan in the comments about it on top of it.
If you want people to properly tag their stuff, they need to think it's not going to get down voted and harrassed just because of the tag. I tag mine anyways (I don't really post much tbh) but I understand why people don't.
The knee jerk reaction of certain members of this community is encouraging hidding the fact that it is AI.
Also, if you like something but change your mind just because you learned it was made the "bad" way, when it's only stupid memes and quirky videos, you are a tool.
Or, and hear me out, maybe just stop posting AI content cause clearly people don't want it, or get over the criticism. People are going to react the way you dont like because many people, myself included, find it unethical. Like yeah, if I see something and like it, but find out it was made in a way I find unethical I am going to think lesser of it. Its called following your own principles. Like if I watch a youtuber and like their content, but then find out they plagiarized it, I am not going to like that youtuber anymore. They did something I find ethically immoral and I am not going to support it.
-
Or, and hear me out, maybe just stop posting AI content cause clearly people don't want it, or get over the criticism. People are going to react the way you dont like because many people, myself included, find it unethical. Like yeah, if I see something and like it, but find out it was made in a way I find unethical I am going to think lesser of it. Its called following your own principles. Like if I watch a youtuber and like their content, but then find out they plagiarized it, I am not going to like that youtuber anymore. They did something I find ethically immoral and I am not going to support it.
wrote last edited by [email protected]That's completely fine until you start brigading and going in the comments and bitching every single time.
There are certain things I don't really like seeing much of. Because I'm a mature person, I simply block the subs and the user's that post it out of those subs.
It's also not genocide, it's not unethical for everyone. Some of us have opinions that are more complex then regurgitating what copyright companies told us to think. For example, stuff like reposting is way more unethical but you aren't actually thinking, grow up.
-
:: context ::
https://piefed.social/post/1348319
Not the user fault. Someone used some blur effect to hide the watermark, probably with Filmora or a similar editor. This is what the future looks like: Blurred or strangely zoomed ai slop video to hide watermarks.
probable source: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DPg7qkLEzK-/ (check the comments)
Guys, this is getting really close—let’s go! Except we’re not in this picture; those are Sam Altman and Jeff Bezos after a skin‑replacement procedure and gender transition to a woman.
For all the poor, we’re getting turned into fucking human cubes mushed with fast‑fashion clothes.
-
Ugh… it could be because I’m a bit groggy but nothing about the video seemed off to me right away. I didn’t even notice the blurred watermark. After looking closely, the Halloween animatronic has 6 fingers on one hand, the area of the animatronic behind the table looks very flatly colored, and the progression of the timer in the top left is not sensical.
Those who did right away notice the video was AI, what stood out to you? I feel like we may need teams of people pointing out suspicious aspects of internet content in the future, but at the efficiency that AI content is generated we might just end up finding ourselves automating the detection process with AI scanners trained to analyze for AI content.
The time, I was trying to parse what date but it made no sense with four numbers, then on the time the seconds jumped to 98 seconds and I was like wait a second...
-
As long as you don’t interact with the video in any way, because using the like/dislike button and leaving comments of any kind are considered to be engagement and only cause the algorithm to recommend it all the more.
So does Reddits "never show me this sub again, seriously, I want it blocked and hidden."
-
There is a group of idiots that will down vote anything related to AI without thought, then bitch and moan in the comments about it on top of it.
If you want people to properly tag their stuff, they need to think it's not going to get down voted and harrassed just because of the tag. I tag mine anyways (I don't really post much tbh) but I understand why people don't.
The knee jerk reaction of certain members of this community is encouraging hidding the fact that it is AI.
Also, if you like something but change your mind just because you learned it was made the "bad" way, when it's only stupid memes and quirky videos, you are a tool.
What's the value add here exactly? Like, why should I give an AI post upvotes when if I wanted to see AI content I could just cut out the middleman and prompt it into existence myself?
-
Ugh… it could be because I’m a bit groggy but nothing about the video seemed off to me right away. I didn’t even notice the blurred watermark. After looking closely, the Halloween animatronic has 6 fingers on one hand, the area of the animatronic behind the table looks very flatly colored, and the progression of the timer in the top left is not sensical.
Those who did right away notice the video was AI, what stood out to you? I feel like we may need teams of people pointing out suspicious aspects of internet content in the future, but at the efficiency that AI content is generated we might just end up finding ourselves automating the detection process with AI scanners trained to analyze for AI content.
To be me it was the way the possum jumped. They don't cartoonishly move their limbs like that, but jump similarly to an Armadillo.
... But not everyone has seen a real one jump to be fair.
