Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. LocalLLaMA
  3. Niche Model of the Day: Openbuddy 25.2q, QwQ 32B with Quantization Aware Training

Niche Model of the Day: Openbuddy 25.2q, QwQ 32B with Quantization Aware Training

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved LocalLLaMA
localllama
1 Posts 1 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B This user is from outside of this forum
    B This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Seems there's not a lot of talk about relatively unknown finetunes these days, so I'll start posting more!

    Openbuddy's been on my radar, but this one is very interesting: QwQ 32B, post-trained on openbuddy's dataset, apparently with QAT applied (though it's kinda unclear) and context-extended. Observations:

    • Quantized with exllamav2, it seems to show lower distortion levels than nomal QwQ. Its works conspicuously well at 4.0bpw and 3.5bpw.

    • Seems good at long context. Have not tested 200K, but it's quite excellent in the 64K range.

    • Works fine in English.

    • The chat template is funky. It seems to mix up the <think> and <|think|> tags in particular (why don't they just use ChatML?), and needs some wrangling with your own template.

    • Seems smart, can't say if it's better or worse than QwQ yet, other than it doesn't seem to "suffer" below 3.75bpw like QwQ does.

    Also, I reposted this from /r/locallama, as I feel the community generally should going forward. With its spirit, it seems like we should be on Lemmy instead?

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    1
    • System shared this topic on
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes


    • Login

    • Login or register to search.
    • First post
      Last post
    0
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • World
    • Users
    • Groups