"Weakening encryption undermines ProtectEU's objectives" – experts slams EU plan to create an encryption backdoor, again
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote on last edited by [email protected]
ProtectEU is the awful initiative to weaken encryption.
The title reads like ProtectEU is something good but it isn't:
Unveiled last April, ProtectEU aims to find a legal way to create a backdoor into encrypted communications
The original title is better:
Experts "deeply concerned" by the EU plan to weaken encryption
Also another "slams" on my bingo card.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Why the hell is the EU considering this, when a possible WW3 is on the horizon?
-
Why the hell is the EU considering this, when a possible WW3 is on the horizon?
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Most major government and similar control organs around the world regularly try to do this, have for decades.
And as it nears finalization, someone finally manages to convince them it's not possible. Usually involving some kind of lock analogy, master keys, and how it's impossible make a lockpick-proof one that you can still open. (Literally the only way to make a lock that can't be be picked non-destructively, is to seal it with something like welding, epoxy, etc. Because if you can use a key, it can be picked, full stop. There is no "but what about ...". Same thing with encryption, if there is a backdoor, it will be found. )
