China is quietly pushing ahead with massive 50,000Mbps broadband rollout to leapfrog rest of the world on internet speeds
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Man, real countries are doing this shit while the US is doing an illegal war on the thought crime of being"woke".
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
China morally bankrupt and developing at a staggering pace which has somewhat stymied as their scoffing at regulations in favor of backroom dealings is kneecapping themselves.
So if you zoom in close enough, like looking at this amazingly fast reported internet speed and only at this speed, China "good."
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Git outta here with that thar metric mumbo jumbo!
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
China will be lucky if they still exist as a single unified nation. Demographics, employment, debt, over built property market, over dependence on manufacturing exports, energy import dependence, food import dependence.
They have a number of very strong headwinds that could very well cause the failure and break up of the CCP in the next twenty years.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Notice how many extra hoops you jumped through to get here
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Have you ever stepped food into China? I have. And I can tell you from personal experience they're living in the future.
They have their own fair share of problems. But the investments they're making into infrastructure are very easily going to catapult them to the head of the class here very shortly...
I'm really tired of being told how distopian China is from people who've never even been there.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
The second one.
Think back to when you were on dial-up. The concept of a streaming movie service would have been a fantasyland. No one was creating one. The infrastructure wasn't there. It was impossible.
As soon as people started getting broadband, and enough people got it, streaming services could exist.
Are you different? No, you just want to watch a movie. But now you don't have to go to Blockbuster.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Unless you're going to host your own YouTube....
This is exactly what peer tube is struggling with. This bandwidth would solve the video federation problem.
See, you get it!
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Except we need IPv6 before that's at all viable.
We are not even filling out the bandwidth of pipes we have to the home right now. "If you build it, they will come" does not apply when there's already something there that isn't being fully utilized.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
To arrive at "China Good," yes you do need to jump through many hoops. Glad we're on the same page, even if you started out strangely.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
640kb? Luxury.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I work on PON and XGPON. Officially we work on a -25dB maximum, but I've seen circuits stable at around 30dB.
It's surprising how many bad splices you can ignore before it gets problematic.
-18.5dB is going to limit you to either a really good fibre path, or a really short one. Unless you have options with long-range SFPs? The constant progress keeps my job interesting at least.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
And then he blocked me XD
All these egotistical children with nothing to be proud of
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Lmao the irony
You have serious ego issues that you will need self reflection to fix.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
I'm working on long range stuff so I'm not so familiar with PON specifically. Maybe I made some bad assumptions. Stable at -30 dBm receive sounds really impressive.
The one I was talking about is this, with 18.5 dB total budget, that is, min +4.5 dBm transmit, and min -14 dBm receive. This one is built with an APD.
In my kind of application, without splitter, this will get you about 30-40 km. We've got one of a slightly older type with 18 dB budget running between Fribourg and Bern for example.
I realize that PON stuff is quite different with the time slitting and I think wavelenght splitting too, at least in XGS-PON, but I was thinking the pure laser and diode physics would need to be the same.
For -25 dBm minimum the most similar of the ones we currently have would be this one which manages -26.9 dBm and is one of the ones with a SOA built in, or for the 10G stuff this one, which manages min -23 dBm but with only an APD and no SOA.
I'm thinking their 50G stuff must be closer to 100G than 10G transceiver design. So I wonder if they manage to make it without SOA.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
China has this covered hands down. If you say Winnie, two mean looking Chinese men appear behind you.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Oh, maybe. I'm not familiar with bandwidth utilization in China.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Very cool and they should keep doing this, but no one’s CPE is going to be able to do anywhere near this speed unless they plan on giving everyone large enterprises routers for home use.
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Who blocked you?
-
[email protected]replied to [email protected] last edited by
Feel free to elaborate. I have no idea what you're talking about other than it seems like tankie screeching to me.