"Thin strip of land"
-
I feel like this is stretching the definition of "thin" to make sure nobody feels insecure about the proportions of the land claimed by local government.
What are we doing here, folks?
wrote last edited by [email protected]Yao Ming isn't thin. He's wider than almost anyone you know. It'd be crazy to call him thin.
But he is still lanky, because of his proportions.
-
Yeah! Thanks. I was shouting "Zoom out! Zoom out!" at my screen.
Does that normally work?
-
It is a very thick but even taller strip of land.
The point of reference for it's thinness shouldn't be it's own height, but rather the sizes of countries in general.
I mean, it's still be thin, but the UK has no place throwing stones from within that glass house lol
It's not very thick, it is thin, but it's extremely long. Chile that is.
Not many countries outside of Europe are as small east-to-west as Chile. Even in Europe the major countries like France, Germany, Spain and even the UK are bigger east-to-west. Italy is bigger east-to-west, but mostly because it's angled. If it were oriented vertically like Chile it would be thinner along most of the boot, but still wider than Chile along the top from the coast near Nice to Venice.
Also worth noting that although the UK isn't all that wide, it has major port cities on both east and west coasts. Chile has an inhospitable mountain range on its eastern side, so really the population is concentrated in an area that's much thinner than the geographic boundaries of the country.
-
This post did not contain any content.
An interesting comparison is Canada. Chile is about as long as Canada is wide, and most of Canada lives within a short distance of the US border, so the population distribution is similar to Chile's.
-
It's not very thick, it is thin, but it's extremely long. Chile that is.
Not many countries outside of Europe are as small east-to-west as Chile. Even in Europe the major countries like France, Germany, Spain and even the UK are bigger east-to-west. Italy is bigger east-to-west, but mostly because it's angled. If it were oriented vertically like Chile it would be thinner along most of the boot, but still wider than Chile along the top from the coast near Nice to Venice.
Also worth noting that although the UK isn't all that wide, it has major port cities on both east and west coasts. Chile has an inhospitable mountain range on its eastern side, so really the population is concentrated in an area that's much thinner than the geographic boundaries of the country.
I recognize that I didn't present a very coherent comment, but that's basically what I meant with my last sentence, lol
-
Both invoke an idea of smallness, though. Maybe skinny?
Yay pedantry!
Svelte Mr. Bediker
-
Does that normally work?
"Enhance!" does. I saw it on every movie and television show with law enforcement on computers.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Somos el mejor país de Chile CTM!
-
This post did not contain any content.
At least call it a banana due to earth's curvature
-
This post did not contain any content.
Now show the population density
-
This post did not contain any content.
Viva chile mierda!
-
This post did not contain any content.
thin is a good description honestly, Snow in the Andes by the morning, and beach by the afternoon.
I like it here 10/10, would be born here again.
-
It's not very thick, it is thin, but it's extremely long. Chile that is.
Not many countries outside of Europe are as small east-to-west as Chile. Even in Europe the major countries like France, Germany, Spain and even the UK are bigger east-to-west. Italy is bigger east-to-west, but mostly because it's angled. If it were oriented vertically like Chile it would be thinner along most of the boot, but still wider than Chile along the top from the coast near Nice to Venice.
Also worth noting that although the UK isn't all that wide, it has major port cities on both east and west coasts. Chile has an inhospitable mountain range on its eastern side, so really the population is concentrated in an area that's much thinner than the geographic boundaries of the country.
Looks at Norway, 8.3km at the narrowest
