I automatically block communities that put requirements like that on participation.
-
I automatically block communities that put requirements like that on participation. If they don't want me interacting with it, I don't want to even see it. I also don't think it's appropriate for a publicly open forum. Go make your own private thing somewhere if you want to immediately start off as an echo chamber.
How are new women to find it if it never appears in All? Feel free to block/remove it, just as you would any niches that don't interest you and clog up your feed. Or just scroll past, like I do for Linux and gaming and moe.
-
How are new women to find it if it never appears in All? Feel free to block/remove it, just as you would any niches that don't interest you and clog up your feed. Or just scroll past, like I do for Linux and gaming and moe.
but linux doesnt tell you you cant comment here if you dont use linux
-
but linux doesnt tell you you cant comment here if you dont use linux
Agreed, it's just a lot of paying attention to the instance names and scrolling past. Usually the post title is a clue as well, but occasionally something sounds like something else. I don't want to block the whole term, because it might be a small part of some post I'd otherwise be interested in. In any case, I know better than to drop comments in a topic that's outside my experience.
-
How are new women to find it if it never appears in All? Feel free to block/remove it, just as you would any niches that don't interest you and clog up your feed. Or just scroll past, like I do for Linux and gaming and moe.
wrote last edited by [email protected]You invite them or advertise where they can sign up. The same as any other kind of private group.
-
I automatically block communities that put requirements like that on participation. If they don't want me interacting with it, I don't want to even see it. I also don't think it's appropriate for a publicly open forum. Go make your own private thing somewhere if you want to immediately start off as an echo chamber.
I didn't want to see your comment, but that won't stop me from complaining about having to see your comment anyway.
-
I automatically block communities that put requirements like that on participation. If they don't want me interacting with it, I don't want to even see it. I also don't think it's appropriate for a publicly open forum. Go make your own private thing somewhere if you want to immediately start off as an echo chamber.
I mean this very kindly but "i don't think it's appropriate" is never a good reason to dictate the actions of others.
-
I automatically block communities that put requirements like that on participation. If they don't want me interacting with it, I don't want to even see it. I also don't think it's appropriate for a publicly open forum. Go make your own private thing somewhere if you want to immediately start off as an echo chamber.
Often find yourself inside many stores you find irrelevant when strolling around town? All those unlocked doors must be such temptation.
-
I automatically block communities that put requirements like that on participation. If they don't want me interacting with it, I don't want to even see it. I also don't think it's appropriate for a publicly open forum. Go make your own private thing somewhere if you want to immediately start off as an echo chamber.
-
but linux doesnt tell you you cant comment here if you dont use linux
wrote last edited by [email protected]Imagine every public linux forum overrun by 90% Windows users, and you might start to get it.
-
I think you just described two things working almost exactly as designed.
You should use block liberally to curate your feed.
Similarly, communities should have whatever rules make sense for them. If that keeps the community small, that might be the desired outcome for them.
I think blocking was the right call here.
There's only one side of this that is using things as designed, and that would be me blocking things I don't want to engage with. If a community wants to cater to a very specific group of people, they should be using the tools of the platform that allow them to do so by being set to private snd creating a whitelist instead of leaving it public and expecting everyone to follow the honor system of not engaging if they are not part of the accepted group.
There is no benefit to leaving it public and being private doesn't make it invisible.
-
Often find yourself inside many stores you find irrelevant when strolling around town? All those unlocked doors must be such temptation.
wrote last edited by [email protected]I don't recall ever seeing a sign on such a locked door (that is not even locked) that said "Open to the public; Come on in" only to walk in and then be shouted at for not being an employee.
-
There's only one side of this that is using things as designed, and that would be me blocking things I don't want to engage with. If a community wants to cater to a very specific group of people, they should be using the tools of the platform that allow them to do so by being set to private snd creating a whitelist instead of leaving it public and expecting everyone to follow the honor system of not engaging if they are not part of the accepted group.
There is no benefit to leaving it public and being private doesn't make it invisible.
In the very broadest sense I don’t disagree with you. Making a community private is a useful tool and can help to simplify strict entry guidelines.
However, given that “Cater to a very specific group of people”, refers to basically half of earth’s population in this case, I do have some quibbles.
I don’t have the data in front of me, but I bet that women represent something quite less than half the population of Lemmy. It doesn’t even stretch the imagination to suppose that they represent just a fraction of the user base.
So this isn’t a niche interest or obscure sub-culture we’re talking about. This is an artificial minority population. Is the simplicity of going private worth the added obscurity and increased friction to what should be organic community growth?
As it is, you had to see it, decide to engage with it, and then learn that it wasn’t meant for you, and you’d have just preferred to remain unaware it ever existed. Never mind that would also ensure most other People remain unaware it exists.
Is it really such a hardship on you for the filter to be set a little wider for the good of that community?
