when will gimp 3.0 get updated on the linux mint (or ubuntu!! or whatever linux mint uses) package manager??
-
Tell us you don’t know what a flatpak is without telling us you don’t know what a flatpak is.
i know what a flatpak is, a third party app provider for gnu/linux that works in any distro!!
-
You can also get the appimage on https://www.gimp.org/downloads/
After downloading, set the execute bit:
chmod +x ./GIMP-3.0.0-x86_64.AppImageand then open the file to open gimp.To make it executable you can just right click -> properties -> make executable.
No need to use the terminal
-
Not sure if I misremember but I think the Mint software manager has a menu option somewhere that shows you a list of PPAs you've added
that is, if you remember to check it
-
i know i can use the flatpak version and i did try that one out on my other laptop but, i think it will come to the package manager when some stuff is fixed??? thank you
Debian/Ubuntu/Mint packages are always older and only get updated once everything is stable.
If you are looking for more up to date packages I would recommend using FlatPaks or AppImages since they are usually maintained by the devs and kept up to date.
-
i know i can use the flatpak version and i did try that one out on my other laptop but, i think it will come to the package manager when some stuff is fixed??? thank you
-
i know i can use the flatpak version and i did try that one out on my other laptop but, i think it will come to the package manager when some stuff is fixed??? thank you
I've got GIMP 3.0 here on my Kubuntu system
️ -
Tell us you don’t know what a flatpak is without telling us you don’t know what a flatpak is.
Tell us you know nothing about running Linux and rely on app stores for your software.
-
Debian/Ubuntu/Mint packages are always older and only get updated once everything is stable.
If you are looking for more up to date packages I would recommend using FlatPaks or AppImages since they are usually maintained by the devs and kept up to date.
How about compiling from source? Or look into how Debian/Ubuntu/Mint build the
gimppackage, then change the version and run the build process on your local machine? -
To make it executable you can just right click -> properties -> make executable.
No need to use the terminal
-
How about compiling from source? Or look into how Debian/Ubuntu/Mint build the
gimppackage, then change the version and run the build process on your local machine?You loose out on automatic updates and not all packages are easy to build. I am not personally familiar with building Gimp. But I’ve tried to build other projects from GitHub only to get errors I couldn’t decipher.
It’s a skill which not many have.
-
I know, i use it all the time, i just think it's silly to recommend the terminal to beginners when theres a gui way that's easier.
-
You loose out on automatic updates and not all packages are easy to build. I am not personally familiar with building Gimp. But I’ve tried to build other projects from GitHub only to get errors I couldn’t decipher.
It’s a skill which not many have.
It’s a skill which not many have.
I think this is why OP got 21 downvotes. It is unreasonable to demand something fast, free, and good. You are going to get flatpak if you want it fast and free.
-
i know what a flatpak is, a third party app provider for gnu/linux that works in any distro!!
Also, the quickest way to get new software versions, in most cases.
-
Tell us you know nothing about running Linux and rely on app stores for your software.
Tell us YOU know nothing about running Linux, especially Mint, which is based on Ubuntu LTS releases, meaning it won't get gimp 3.0 until the next major release, and so a flatpak, snap, or PPA with an unreliable release cadence are the only ways to get it before then unless you compile it yourself. Seriously dude, pull your head out.
-
i know what a flatpak is, a third party app provider for gnu/linux that works in any distro!!
Cool, glad you know that. Were you also aware that by running Linux Mint, you are tied to Ubuntu LTS releases? This would mean major revisions in software upgrades only come with next major releases of Mint. So that leaves you with flatpaks, snaps, or PPA repositories, or building it yourself. LTS releases designed this way so that you run known stable versions of pretty much everything. Switching to a rolling release distro would bring you what you want more quickly, but at the cost of more potential hiccups... but I say potential, because problems might never arise.
-
Tell us you don’t know what a flatpak is without telling us you don’t know what a flatpak is.
You kids are savage today, the hell?
-
Also, the quickest way to get new software versions, in most cases.
@[email protected] is correct.
-
i know i can use the flatpak version and i did try that one out on my other laptop but, i think it will come to the package manager when some stuff is fixed??? thank you
i know i can use the flatpak version and i did try that one out on my other laptop but, i think it will come to the package manager when some stuff is fixed??? thank you
Not likely, at least not for Mint or your current version of Ubuntu. For Ubuntu, it probably would end up in their next major release, like 26.04 for LTS, and whatever the next interim release is for non LTS. Mint is based on LTS, so sometime after 26.04 Ubuntu.
Flatpak, Snap, AppImage, PPA, or build from source would be your options on Mint for now.
-
what!! oh my gosh until 2026?? i think i should get the flatpak version then. oh woa, thank you
This is why I don't understand the downvote hate I got for mentioning flatpak. Downvoted for the correct advice, which is so very Linux "community". I've been running Linux since Slackware 1.0, and the only thing consistent about the Linux community is it's eagerness to eat it's own.
-
Cool, glad you know that. Were you also aware that by running Linux Mint, you are tied to Ubuntu LTS releases? This would mean major revisions in software upgrades only come with next major releases of Mint. So that leaves you with flatpaks, snaps, or PPA repositories, or building it yourself. LTS releases designed this way so that you run known stable versions of pretty much everything. Switching to a rolling release distro would bring you what you want more quickly, but at the cost of more potential hiccups... but I say potential, because problems might never arise.
yea i know all that, and that is the reason why stable distros are good for me because everything is familiar and the same way it is always!! i will only update every few years yep. i know ubuntu and mint are the same distro but derivative, one just doesn't have snaps and has a different color but that's fine
