Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Programmer Humor
  3. CGNAT version 2

CGNAT version 2

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Programmer Humor
programmerhumor
64 Posts 45 Posters 42 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B [email protected]

    For every IPv4 address, IPv6 has 18 quintillion IPv4 Internets.

    But, sure, it might be possible for us to fsck up allocations, again.

    I This user is from outside of this forum
    I This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #51

    wouldn't surprise me if we end up in a situation where individual programs have their own IP. then individual variables, so different programs in different networks can access them.

    that might actually end up consuming all the addresses
    ...

    stupid suggestion. just saying that future technologies might figure up a way to fuck this up again

    B C 2 Replies Last reply
    1
    • I [email protected]

      wouldn't surprise me if we end up in a situation where individual programs have their own IP. then individual variables, so different programs in different networks can access them.

      that might actually end up consuming all the addresses
      ...

      stupid suggestion. just saying that future technologies might figure up a way to fuck this up again

      B This user is from outside of this forum
      B This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #52

      Yeah, the Universe keep making bigger fools (of us all). But, we should still use IPv6 instead of clawing the tattered remains of IPv4. I just wish my ISP agreed.

      I 1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • xylight@lemdro.idX [email protected]
        This post did not contain any content.
        jenny_ball@lemmy.worldJ This user is from outside of this forum
        jenny_ball@lemmy.worldJ This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #53

        i just want fiber at my address

        1 Reply Last reply
        13
        • xylight@lemdro.idX [email protected]
          This post did not contain any content.
          B This user is from outside of this forum
          B This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #54

          Shit is that my computer's rear end? I haven't looked in there for years! There could be intelligent rats back there pretending to be AI.

          U 1 Reply Last reply
          4
          • I [email protected]

            wouldn't surprise me if we end up in a situation where individual programs have their own IP. then individual variables, so different programs in different networks can access them.

            that might actually end up consuming all the addresses
            ...

            stupid suggestion. just saying that future technologies might figure up a way to fuck this up again

            C This user is from outside of this forum
            C This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #55

            There's enough V6 addresses for every atom on the planet and enough spare to do it 100x over. We'll be fine.

            I 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • B [email protected]

              Yeah, the Universe keep making bigger fools (of us all). But, we should still use IPv6 instead of clawing the tattered remains of IPv4. I just wish my ISP agreed.

              I This user is from outside of this forum
              I This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #56

              without a doubt ipv6 is an improvement. only loss is that it's humanely possible to remember ipv4 addressed, but that ain't necessary.

              my only "objection" is that an actual solution should accommodate unlimited growth, rather than what we consider a big enough number.

              B 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C [email protected]

                There's enough V6 addresses for every atom on the planet and enough spare to do it 100x over. We'll be fine.

                I This user is from outside of this forum
                I This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #57

                going to gave each atom in the solar system its own IP address.

                checkmate

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • B [email protected]

                  Shit is that my computer's rear end? I haven't looked in there for years! There could be intelligent rats back there pretending to be AI.

                  U This user is from outside of this forum
                  U This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #58

                  Definitely not mine. It's way too clean.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • I [email protected]

                    without a doubt ipv6 is an improvement. only loss is that it's humanely possible to remember ipv4 addressed, but that ain't necessary.

                    my only "objection" is that an actual solution should accommodate unlimited growth, rather than what we consider a big enough number.

                    B This user is from outside of this forum
                    B This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #59

                    I think that's a bad objection. It's idealistic in the worst way, it's making "Perfect [...] the enemy of the good". Plus, there are significant practical advantages to a fixed-length addressing scheme, and any fixed-length going to have a maximum. So, under the constraint of fixed-length addressing "big enough" is all we have.

                    128 bits really is quite hard to fill up, we'll have to worry about a lot of very different things before the run out of addresses. Like speed-of-light latency vs. TCP (and possibly TLS session) timers for interplanetary connections.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • laggykar@programming.devL [email protected]

                      OK, bad examples. On the other hand e.g. X, GitHub, Pornhub, PSN, Steam or Discord do not support IPv6.

                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      S This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #60

                      Really discord. Didint discord start existing when ipv6 was becoming more and more normalised unlike the rest of those examples.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • I [email protected]

                        fair, but isn't IPv6 just going with the same assumption as IPv4, "so many addresses, no way we will ever use them all"

                        N This user is from outside of this forum
                        N This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by
                        #61

                        They didn't read xkcd 865, I guess. Or maybe they did.

                        I 1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • N [email protected]

                          They didn't read xkcd 865, I guess. Or maybe they did.

                          I This user is from outside of this forum
                          I This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote last edited by
                          #62

                          there's always a relevant XKCD

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • R [email protected]

                            Not exactly what youโ€™re looking for but this came across my radar recently https://store.steampowered.com/app/2939600/Tower_Networking_Inc/

                            O This user is from outside of this forum
                            O This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote last edited by
                            #63

                            I now have several hours in this game. If you enjoy setting up networks and working with the equipment, this is a great simulation for it still being a super early version. And if youโ€™re wanting to test the waters, a great way to test if it might be your thing.

                            Side note: Not for the OCD-inclined.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • obstreperouscanadian@lemmy.caO [email protected]

                              So, Tunnet? https://store.steampowered.com/app/2286390/Tunnet/

                              deebster@infosec.pubD This user is from outside of this forum
                              deebster@infosec.pubD This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote last edited by
                              #64

                              Tags

                              • Logic
                              • Exploration
                              • Psychological Horror

                              Love it.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups