Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Fediverse
  3. Second largest Lemmy instance preemptively un-friends Facebook

Second largest Lemmy instance preemptively un-friends Facebook

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Fediverse
fediverse
5 Posts 4 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • ruffsl@programming.devR This user is from outside of this forum
    ruffsl@programming.devR This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #1

    Lemmy.ml has now blocked Threads.net

    ? P 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • ruffsl@programming.devR [email protected]

      Lemmy.ml has now blocked Threads.net

      ? Offline
      ? Offline
      Guest
      wrote on last edited by
      #2

      Generally disagree. If you want the Fediverse to become a large open standard, if not the largest, then this is going to just be a matter of course. Companies will seek to commodify all their offerings, whether they use open standards or not. Many exist that commodify on top of open-source software and open standards. The important part is to ACHEIVE the open standard to begin with, and I think it's short-sighted to pre-emptively block something that could be a strong item down that path, and before it might show itself to be more harmful towards that goal.

      It can always be blocked later, situation-depending.

      N 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • ruffsl@programming.devR [email protected]

        Lemmy.ml has now blocked Threads.net

        P This user is from outside of this forum
        P This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #3

        Yeah, the problem here as I see it is that just the same as Twitter, this social media service is still owned by a single owner corporation who is running the service for a profit and they will eventually sell user data or bastardize the service. Ive been on the internet for 30 years, social media and websites come and go and so does their popularity.

        Which raises another point, how are the bills being paid for with any of these services, including lemmy? TAANSTAFL.

        N 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • P [email protected]

          Yeah, the problem here as I see it is that just the same as Twitter, this social media service is still owned by a single owner corporation who is running the service for a profit and they will eventually sell user data or bastardize the service. Ive been on the internet for 30 years, social media and websites come and go and so does their popularity.

          Which raises another point, how are the bills being paid for with any of these services, including lemmy? TAANSTAFL.

          N This user is from outside of this forum
          N This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #4

          Lemmy instances are mostly paid through donations.

          although there might be some exeptions.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ? Guest

            Generally disagree. If you want the Fediverse to become a large open standard, if not the largest, then this is going to just be a matter of course. Companies will seek to commodify all their offerings, whether they use open standards or not. Many exist that commodify on top of open-source software and open standards. The important part is to ACHEIVE the open standard to begin with, and I think it's short-sighted to pre-emptively block something that could be a strong item down that path, and before it might show itself to be more harmful towards that goal.

            It can always be blocked later, situation-depending.

            N This user is from outside of this forum
            N This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #5

            The problem is that we alredy had a similar problem with XMPP and google Talk.

            Where gooogle took over with google talk.

            You can read more about it here.

            https://lemmy.world/post/1121594

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • System shared this topic on
              System shared this topic
            Reply
            • Reply as topic
            Log in to reply
            • Oldest to Newest
            • Newest to Oldest
            • Most Votes


            • Login

            • Login or register to search.
            • First post
              Last post
            0
            • Categories
            • Recent
            • Tags
            • Popular
            • World
            • Users
            • Groups