Why don't the whole planet just use UTC+00:00 / Universal Time without time zones?
-
Why isn't this a popular thing?
It would make it even harder for people to understand when it was in a different timezone. Right now I know that 11pm is late for anyone on thier own timezone. But with no timezone, I would say, the meeting is at 23:00. Thats mid morning for me, what is that for you... the answer is way less exact, and harder to covert.
So you day is my day minus half a morning? -
Why isn't this a popular thing?
Most people don't have to deal with booking a meeting a few timezones away or anything else where it would be an advantage on a regular basis.
It's convenient if the date, and possibly weekday, changes at night.
-
This happens anyway. I literally have meetings every week where it's Tuesday night for everyone else on the meeting, and Wednesday morning for me.
That's different, your day remains Wednesday their day remains Tuesday, they're talking about going to lunch on Tuesday and coming back on Wednesday, do you call that your Tuesday lunch? Tuesday Dinner? Wednesday breakfast? Wednesday lunch?
-
That's different, your day remains Wednesday their day remains Tuesday, they're talking about going to lunch on Tuesday and coming back on Wednesday, do you call that your Tuesday lunch? Tuesday Dinner? Wednesday breakfast? Wednesday lunch?
Legal things would be a mess.
Your visa is valid until the end of the month. Halfway through the day?
-
Have you ... have you never stayed up past midnight?
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Not while at work. And at parties, it's rarely of concern what day or time it is.
If I lived like a hermit in a first, yeah, it wouldn't matter.
-
because despite all the technological advancement, we still live enclosed in these self-ambulatory lumps of flesh that crave the sun.
Living in the same timezone doesn't mean waking up and going to bed at the same time.
You can still consider whatever time the sun gets up in your area as morning and the dusk will tell you when it's evening.
-
Why isn't this a popular thing?
For the same reason the whole planet does not use the metric system (I'm looking at you america, you old faded superpower).
-
Why isn't this a popular thing?
100% because 0 is set to UK/France. Utc 0 should have been somewhere in the middle of pacific if it was ever intended to be adopted. Now why would India or smt set their clocks to UK?
As someone who mostly lives on UTC it's such a sad wasted opportunity and it'll never be widely adopted.
-
Why isn't this a popular thing?
Because that would be a nightmare. "I'll meet you for lunch at 2AM", "No, I had a huge breakfast yesterday". You would need to relearn the times every time you went to a different place, "oh, right, the restaurants only serve lunch until 10AM" or "Sorry sir, but there's an extra fee for night time services starting 1PM". Those are much more likely day-to-day phrases than scheduling a meeting with someone from another continent. And you don't gain anything by this, because whenever you're communicating across timezones you can simply use UTC as a standard and everyone knows how to convert that to their own time. So there's no good reason and a lot of drawbacks.
-
For the same reason the whole planet does not use the metric system (I'm looking at you america, you old faded superpower).
Because base 10 is vastly inferior to base 12? Go ahead, divide a kilometer into thirds without repeating decimals YOU CANT WHERES YOUR ANTOIN LAVOISER NOW
Babylon was right.
-
Why isn't this a popular thing?
I believe no one else mentioned this but... China is a case study of why this is a terrible idea
The entire PRC uses the same time zone, even though in any other parts of the world, China should have been split to at least 3 different timezones
It is very disorienting to try and go for breakfast in Tibet at 9 am to find that nothing is open and the sun is just out... So yeah. Imagine if this is extended to 12-hr differences
Wikipedia has a nice summary of this
-
Because that would be a nightmare. "I'll meet you for lunch at 2AM", "No, I had a huge breakfast yesterday". You would need to relearn the times every time you went to a different place, "oh, right, the restaurants only serve lunch until 10AM" or "Sorry sir, but there's an extra fee for night time services starting 1PM". Those are much more likely day-to-day phrases than scheduling a meeting with someone from another continent. And you don't gain anything by this, because whenever you're communicating across timezones you can simply use UTC as a standard and everyone knows how to convert that to their own time. So there's no good reason and a lot of drawbacks.
I am baffled that needs explanation!
-
Living in the same timezone doesn't mean waking up and going to bed at the same time.
You can still consider whatever time the sun gets up in your area as morning and the dusk will tell you when it's evening.
What's the point of having the same time zone when people are not going by it?
Like, "hey when you go to Singapore you gotta pay attention as the shops open at 22:00 and close at 13:00"!
-
What's the point of having the same time zone when people are not going by it?
Like, "hey when you go to Singapore you gotta pay attention as the shops open at 22:00 and close at 13:00"!
wrote on last edited by [email protected]The point is to avoid timezone confusion and simplify international cooperation. Inside the countries, there are some successful experiments: for example, China is present in 5 time zones, but the entire nation lives by UTC+8. And while 5 time zones are not 24, this arrangement is generally regarded positively by the people, despite the fact it's measured by Beijing, which is located on the east, and not by some point in the middle of the country.
-
Why isn't this a popular thing?
It's because a lot of the way humans go about their life is based on traditions. Getting everybody to switch from a system that already works pretty well is just a hassle.
Examples:
- English spelling is faaar from phonetic and children take longer to learn how to spell than in Spanish for example. (though, cough, enough, plough instead of something like thouÄŸ, koff, enaf and the US plow)
- Metric system adopted globally would streamline a lot of global industries that have no cater to each system.
- Driving right side everywhere. Sweden switched but asking India to switch makes way less sense.
- Date formats. Arguably the best if everyone uses ISO 8601 but nobody does.
-
Why isn't this a popular thing?
That would make time more unrelated to the sun, which is pretty important.
-
The point is to avoid timezone confusion and simplify international cooperation. Inside the countries, there are some successful experiments: for example, China is present in 5 time zones, but the entire nation lives by UTC+8. And while 5 time zones are not 24, this arrangement is generally regarded positively by the people, despite the fact it's measured by Beijing, which is located on the east, and not by some point in the middle of the country.
You can't be serious. There's no way we can compare something that spans two hours both ways with something that spans twelve hours.
-
Because base 10 is vastly inferior to base 12? Go ahead, divide a kilometer into thirds without repeating decimals YOU CANT WHERES YOUR ANTOIN LAVOISER NOW
Babylon was right.
Americans saying the metric system is dumb while reasoning that its bad because they can't do decimals and fractions properly will never not be funny.
"omg 1/3km is 333.33 metres! it doesnt make any sense!"
1 foot = 0.33 yards? "totally logical, so easy!"
5280 feet in a mile? "wow so simple"
10mm in a cm, 100cm in a m, 1000m in a km? "its impossible to grasp!"
you guys think you're so ahead of the rest of the world, while crashing probes into Mars and not knowing a 1/3 pounder is bigger than a 1/4 pounder, but everyone else easily converting volume to weight to temperature to distance at every order of magnitude are just laughing at you.
-
Americans saying the metric system is dumb while reasoning that its bad because they can't do decimals and fractions properly will never not be funny.
"omg 1/3km is 333.33 metres! it doesnt make any sense!"
1 foot = 0.33 yards? "totally logical, so easy!"
5280 feet in a mile? "wow so simple"
10mm in a cm, 100cm in a m, 1000m in a km? "its impossible to grasp!"
you guys think you're so ahead of the rest of the world, while crashing probes into Mars and not knowing a 1/3 pounder is bigger than a 1/4 pounder, but everyone else easily converting volume to weight to temperature to distance at every order of magnitude are just laughing at you.
I'm not defending the imperial system. The imperial system is based on nothing, that's worse than being based on 10. Base 10 is stupid, base 12 is better. We only use base 10 because we have 10 fingers, because apparently people are all children and need to count on their fingers.
-
It wasn't a hodgepodge; it was a system designed to the requirements of the day. Every town setting their own clocks to the local high noon wasn't a bad idea for a while. Hell, the ability to transfer the knowledge of time from another part of the world only came about a few generations before.
It wasn't until the railroads started operating where it became important for different cities to have the same time down to the minute. Until then, local noon worked well enough.
What you describe is very much a hodgepodge. Everyone doing their own, kinda maybe acurate thing. There were tales from this time of towns being off by 30 minutes here and there that were nearby each other. You could leave a town on a horse at noon and arrive in a town 3 miles away also at noon.
And the immediate precursor to this was the stage coach system, which had to generally approximate when a stage should show up to have fresh horses ready, and know of something had gone wrong to go look for them. That was less about minutes and more about halves or quarter of an hour.
Prior to that, the hours were rung by churches to call people to prayer, based on sundials and guesses during overcast days. The 24 hour day wasnt actually standardized into all 24 hours being the same length for centuries, because it was all solar days observation.
Where we agree is that very few people really cared about time down to the minute unless you needed to. Crops, livestock, and rains are things that are on the order of days. Even in cities, dawn, dusk, noon, were good enough for most people for centuries.
