Bricked up
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
It's multipurpose, it celebrates pride, and it can be used to smack a fascist with if they get in your face about it
-
It's multipurpose, it celebrates pride, and it can be used to smack a fascist with if they get in your face about it
I don't think violently hurting people is a good idea.
-
I don't think violently hurting people is a good idea.
Crazy responses huh? If it makes you feel better, after they chase off any voices of reason, these type of people resort to eating eachother.
-
I don't think violently hurting people is a good idea.
I understand this statement in principle but unfortunately thats not how the world works. If you tolerate intolerance you will just end up opressed or dead.
Fascists don't have any problems hurting and killing whoever they deem not worthy of living, they should be met with the same prejudice. -
I understand this statement in principle but unfortunately thats not how the world works. If you tolerate intolerance you will just end up opressed or dead.
Fascists don't have any problems hurting and killing whoever they deem not worthy of living, they should be met with the same prejudice.This. Violence against fascists isn't really violence, it's enforcement of the societal End User License Agreement.
-
I don't think violently hurting people is a good idea.
Tell that to the fascists.
-
Tell that to the fascists.
I tell it to everybody, whether they are actively violent or not.
-
Crazy responses huh? If it makes you feel better, after they chase off any voices of reason, these type of people resort to eating eachother.
What is the voice of reason for fascists?
-
This. Violence against fascists isn't really violence, it's enforcement of the societal End User License Agreement.
You understand how circular that reasoning is right?
-
I don't think violently hurting people is a good idea.
Totally depends on who you're hurting.
-
I tell it to everybody, whether they are actively violent or not.
That's a lovely sentiment, but in reality some people just need to be beaten violently. All you're doing is putting that responsibility on someone else.
-
You understand how circular that reasoning is right?
You have two opposing groups, let's call them a and B. Group a says "we dont think group b has a right to exist and we are prepared to get violent" and group b says "we will never use violence". How long do you expect group b to last?
Fascists are mercifully not common where I live, but if I hear one mouthing off they're going to get a savage beating.
-
Totally depends on who you're hurting.
No.
Even animals don't deserve to be treated violently.
-
That's a lovely sentiment, but in reality some people just need to be beaten violently. All you're doing is putting that responsibility on someone else.
I don't believe in justifying violence on humans or animals.
-
I don't believe in justifying violence on humans or animals.
So if you were walking through the streets of Mariupol and saw a russian soldier violently raping a child (I use this example because it's not uncommon) you'd, what, ask them nicely to stop, let them get on with it?
-
You have two opposing groups, let's call them a and B. Group a says "we dont think group b has a right to exist and we are prepared to get violent" and group b says "we will never use violence". How long do you expect group b to last?
Fascists are mercifully not common where I live, but if I hear one mouthing off they're going to get a savage beating.
Surely the answer is both sides decided the other doesnt have a right to exist. There's no difference between labeling someone a Nazi or labeling someone trans when the only point is to excuse violence on that group.
People are letting their emotions cloud their better judgment, or they haven't developed better judgment yet. Unfortunately people think very short term and often mold reasoning around their actions after the fact.
-
No.
Even animals don't deserve to be treated violently.
That implies animals are lesser than fascists.
-
Surely the answer is both sides decided the other doesnt have a right to exist. There's no difference between labeling someone a Nazi or labeling someone trans when the only point is to excuse violence on that group.
People are letting their emotions cloud their better judgment, or they haven't developed better judgment yet. Unfortunately people think very short term and often mold reasoning around their actions after the fact.
A trans person is a trans person does not have a choice about their identity. Being a nazi is a choice you make because you want to hate people. A nazi merely needs to decide not to be a cunt and the problem resolves itself. The only way a trans person can make peace with a nazi is by hiding who they are and living a lie. It's not the same. And if you think it is then either A: you're delusional or B: you know I'm right but you're also a nazi.
To put it a different way, should black people go around in white face to make the kkk happy?
-
A trans person is a trans person does not have a choice about their identity. Being a nazi is a choice you make because you want to hate people. A nazi merely needs to decide not to be a cunt and the problem resolves itself. The only way a trans person can make peace with a nazi is by hiding who they are and living a lie. It's not the same. And if you think it is then either A: you're delusional or B: you know I'm right but you're also a nazi.
To put it a different way, should black people go around in white face to make the kkk happy?
They are similar in american society because both would argue they have a right to exist, and both are targets for violence in public if they are overt about it. I'm simply saying neither should be attacked, the whole point is to coexist. People need to learn how to de-escalate and create bridges, not hit each other in the face with bricks.
Edit to answer your question: Obviously not, black people don't want to be white people. Trans people do want to pass as a specific gender.
