Probably worth pointing out that neither Israel nor the US seem interested in occupying Iranian territory.
-
Press x doubt.
They did it with Iraq, Afghanistan and Vietnam. They will definitely do it again if they see a chance to remove the Iranian regime and replace it with their own.
Do you think removing the Ayatollahs would make things better or worse for the Iranian people?
-
Probably worth pointing out that neither Israel nor the US seem interested in occupying Iranian territory.
It really isn't but thanks for trying to contribute to the conversation I guess
-
The US didn't occupy Iraq territory after 2003 and they still murdered hundreds of thousands in cold blood and destroyed an entire country, leaving it without infrastructure or future prospects, to be ravaged by radicalism and poverty.
They want to do this to Iran too. Please stop jumping to defend the western genocidal empire
https://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=123751&page=1
https://www.city-journal.org/article/the-id-of-mesopotamia
Let's not pretend things were going well under Saddam Hussein either.
-
Do you think removing the Ayatollahs would make things better or worse for the Iranian people?
Roll out white saviours! The ends don’t justify the means, and all this has happened before, with disastrous results
-
https://abcnews.go.com/2020/story?id=123751&page=1
https://www.city-journal.org/article/the-id-of-mesopotamia
Let's not pretend things were going well under Saddam Hussein either.
Literal FOX News levels of the extrajudicially-murdered individual wasn't a saint either. Saddam sucked, but what the US brought was a million times worse.
-
Literal FOX News levels of the extrajudicially-murdered individual wasn't a saint either. Saddam sucked, but what the US brought was a million times worse.
I really don't think that's the case.
-
I really don't think that's the case.
That's just because you're an ignorant then
-
I really don't think that's the case.
The USA and the UK were massive supporters of Saddam and his reign until we decided he was no longer useful. Literally giving him billions and billions of weapons. We allowed him to consolidate power and act as a destabilizing force in the region until we decided he was bad, but until then he was a very close ally. https://archive.globalpolicy.org/iraq-conflict-the-historical-background-/us-and-british-support-for-huss-regime.html
-
The USA and the UK were massive supporters of Saddam and his reign until we decided he was no longer useful. Literally giving him billions and billions of weapons. We allowed him to consolidate power and act as a destabilizing force in the region until we decided he was bad, but until then he was a very close ally. https://archive.globalpolicy.org/iraq-conflict-the-historical-background-/us-and-british-support-for-huss-regime.html
That doesn't surprise me, the US in particular is very good at supporting their future enemies.
-
That's just because you're an ignorant then
Getting called ignorant by a Saddam apologist is... Something.
-
Do you think removing the Ayatollahs would make things better or worse for the Iranian people?
The Iranians would do better without the IR. You won't bomb them into revolting however.
-
Getting called ignorant by a Saddam apologist is... Something.
"""Saddam apologist""" here meaning, anyone who opposed the Iraq War.
Fucking hawks, I stg. Every time.
-
Do you think removing the Ayatollahs would make things better or worse for the Iranian people?
Worse, unquestionably.
-
Probably worth pointing out that neither Israel nor the US seem interested in occupying Iranian territory.
I really hope you someday get to experience the receiving end of the politics you support.
-
Do you think removing the Ayatollahs would make things better or worse for the Iranian people?
wrote on last edited by [email protected]People thought removing the saddam regime would make things better. Turns out it didn't and it cost the lives of 1 million. This isn't a game you just play.
Of course, take a look at Libya too.
