I'm gonna take a fuckin' migraine.
-
Well, the strikes might have "totally obliterated" empty halls. Because the Iranians knew well before that those sites were in the crosshairs, and if they have the least bit of smart in them, they had moved everything of value to someplace else before the Americans came.
The indication of lack of radioactivity (according to the IAEC) means that either the bombs did not reach any life facilities, or that anything radioactive had already left the premises.
My guess is that those bunker busters simply hit empty rooms.
My guess is you posted this on the wrong post.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Up date update: date up date
-
Well actually no, I only got 7/8 and didn't have the capitalization correct. But I appreciate your support, not only in tone but also in source material
Struggling to see it really making sense as a sentence with more than 5. Reading the example doesn't really seem like a proper sentence either. Replacing buffalo with the 3 different meanings of the word for the full sentence doesn't really seem like a sentence. "Bison intimidate intimidate bison" specifically, why is intimidate repeated? Also why the extra "Buffalonian bison" at the start.
[(Buffalonian bison) (Buffalonian bison intimidate)] intimidate (Buffalonian bison).
At least this easily makes sense - Buffalonian bison intimidate Buffalonian bison, but that just gives you buffalo repeated 5 times.
-
My guess is you posted this on the wrong post.
Yep, you re right.
-
This post did not contain any content.
so, whoever coined the term "coined the term", coined the term "coined the term"
even bash is more precise than human language
-
This post did not contain any content.
Buffalo buffalo buffalo, etc
-
oh, i miss word avalanches
Wouldn't the sentence 'I want to put a hyphen between the words Fish and And and And and Chips in my Fish-and-Chips sign' have been clearer if quotation marks had been placed before Fish, and between Fish and and, and and and And, and And and and, and and and And, and And and and, and and and Chips, as well as after Chips?
-
so, whoever coined the term "coined the term", coined the term "coined the term"
even bash is more precise than human language
ad username: just -j8? how long does that take?
-
Mushroom mushroom?
Badger, badger, badger, badger.
-
This post did not contain any content.
All of the faith that he had had had had no effect on the outcome of his life.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Somewhere at Microsoft there is, presumably a Teams Team team.
-
ad username: just -j8? how long does that take?
look at you , Mister Money Bag smh
-
Wouldn't the sentence 'I want to put a hyphen between the words Fish and And and And and Chips in my Fish-and-Chips sign' have been clearer if quotation marks had been placed before Fish, and between Fish and and, and and and And, and And and and, and and and And, and And and and, and and and Chips, as well as after Chips?
I've read and so many times now it doesn't look like a word anymore
-
Struggling to see it really making sense as a sentence with more than 5. Reading the example doesn't really seem like a proper sentence either. Replacing buffalo with the 3 different meanings of the word for the full sentence doesn't really seem like a sentence. "Bison intimidate intimidate bison" specifically, why is intimidate repeated? Also why the extra "Buffalonian bison" at the start.
[(Buffalonian bison) (Buffalonian bison intimidate)] intimidate (Buffalonian bison).
At least this easily makes sense - Buffalonian bison intimidate Buffalonian bison, but that just gives you buffalo repeated 5 times.
It helps somewhat to replace “Buffalonian buffalo” with “people”:
People (that other) people intimidate, intimidate (other) people.
-
Struggling to see it really making sense as a sentence with more than 5. Reading the example doesn't really seem like a proper sentence either. Replacing buffalo with the 3 different meanings of the word for the full sentence doesn't really seem like a sentence. "Bison intimidate intimidate bison" specifically, why is intimidate repeated? Also why the extra "Buffalonian bison" at the start.
[(Buffalonian bison) (Buffalonian bison intimidate)] intimidate (Buffalonian bison).
At least this easily makes sense - Buffalonian bison intimidate Buffalonian bison, but that just gives you buffalo repeated 5 times.
Buffalonian buffalo [who] Buffalonian buffalo bully, bully Buffalonian buffalo
for me splitting the groups made the sentence make sense:
NJ people NY people bully, bully NY people -
All of the faith that he had had had had no effect on the outcome of his life.
James while John had had had had had had had had had had had a better effect on the teacher.
-
Badger, badger, badger, badger.
Snake! A snake! Oh, it's a snake!
-
Buffalo buffalo buffalo, etc
...for any natural number of repetitions of "buffalo", no less.
-
Buffalonian buffalo [who] Buffalonian buffalo bully, bully Buffalonian buffalo
for me splitting the groups made the sentence make sense:
NJ people NY people bully, bully NY peopleAhh, that makes more sense now.
-
Struggling to see it really making sense as a sentence with more than 5. Reading the example doesn't really seem like a proper sentence either. Replacing buffalo with the 3 different meanings of the word for the full sentence doesn't really seem like a sentence. "Bison intimidate intimidate bison" specifically, why is intimidate repeated? Also why the extra "Buffalonian bison" at the start.
[(Buffalonian bison) (Buffalonian bison intimidate)] intimidate (Buffalonian bison).
At least this easily makes sense - Buffalonian bison intimidate Buffalonian bison, but that just gives you buffalo repeated 5 times.
wrote on last edited by [email protected](Buffalonian bison) (Buffalonian bison intimidate)] intimidate (Buffalonian bison).
[(Albany cattle) (Utica bison bully)] intimidate (Syracuse oxen)
[The] Albany cattle (that Utica bison bully) intimidate Syracuse oxen.
In this sentence, "cattle" are the subject, and "oxen" are the object. The verb is "intimidate". Everything else is some form of adjective modifying "cattle" or "oxen"
We can go further:
[The] Albany Cattle (that Utica Bison bully) intimidate [the] Syracuse oxen (that Poughkeepsie yak deceive).
Cattle are still the subject; Oxen are still the object.
The cattle (which are bullied by the bison) intimidate the oxen (which are deceived by the yak)
Moving on:
[The] Albany cattle (that Utica bison [that Buffalo buffalo buffalo] bully) intimidate [the] Syracuse oxen [that Poughkeepsie yak deceive].
The cattle are still intimidating the oxen. Which cattle? The cattle that are bullied by bison. Which bison? The bison that are buffaloed by buffalo.
Which oxen? The oxen that are deceived by the yak.
The buffalo buffalo the bison; the bison bully the cattle; the cattle intimidate the oxen. Which oxen? The oxen which are deceived by the yak.
