What number is supposed to be here?
-
I’d say two. Look at the two to right of it the pixels match
But another 2 Pixels would be missing. The 7 above seems to show that the first two rows of those digits were printed completely.
-
You care whether something you already ate would have expired 7 months vs 9 months later?
From the other comments it seems to me that OP doesn't care about the BBD, but just about figuring out which digit it is. For fun, I guess.
-
This post did not contain any content.
2 or 5. If I had to guess, it would be 2
1: no
2: Possibly
3: no
4: no - no examples, but I don't think any format would have the 2 dots at the bottom left corner
5: Possibly - no examples though
6: no
7: No
8: no
9: No - no examples, but same reason as 4 -
2 or 5. If I had to guess, it would be 2
1: no
2: Possibly
3: no
4: no - no examples, but I don't think any format would have the 2 dots at the bottom left corner
5: Possibly - no examples though
6: no
7: No
8: no
9: No - no examples, but same reason as 4wrote last edited by [email protected]The 2 doesn't have a flat top. I say 5.
-
I would guess a number between 0 and 9
I can narrow that down to 1 and 9, because it's definitely not the month of nontober
-
But another 2 Pixels would be missing. The 7 above seems to show that the first two rows of those digits were printed completely.
Yes but the there is printed like a normal three. The font on a computer screen showing 3 has the left edge of the three arced down. In a can I’ve never seen it arced down.
-
I can narrow that down to 1 and 9, because it's definitely not the month of nontober
Lousy Smarch weather
-
My vote is to taste and smell the fucking thing. This is what every chef in every kitchen you eat at has always done. That will tell you if it's edible. BBD is a suggestion, so a few months out of date means wildly different things if it's been kept at an average of 20c or 30c.
I've tasted shit that was 5 years past BBD. Didn't taste good, but didn't cause any harm. Trust your taste and smell to tell you what's bad. Evolution spent millions of years tuning your senses.
Looks are also important. Botulism doesn't have a taste or smell, but the can will often be swollen or at least pressurised, so never eat a swollen can.
-
This post did not contain any content.
that is a 3.
the 3 above has been cut off as well.
no other numbers are flat on top and open on the back.
-
The 2 doesn't have a flat top. I say 5.
If it were a 2, I think the left side of the 2 may have been cut off
Very crude markup:
- Green: The dots I think were included
- Red: The dots I'm assuming you're referring to (in which case I would agree with you)
- Blue: Showing the (extremely rough) alignment. Based on the 7, there's a max of 5 dots across for a given character. Indicating there is a potential row on the left that may either be the actual left side of the character (in which case it would be red and you would be right), or it's also a misprint (which then it ccoouulldd be green)
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote last edited by [email protected]
It is a 5.
Nothing left to guess. All others can be ruled out with the dots that we actually see.
2 can be ruled out because there is one dot wrong in the upper left corner.
3 can be ruled out because there is one dot wrong in the lower left corner.
7 can be ruled out because there is one dot wrong in the lower left corner.
-
that is a 3.
the 3 above has been cut off as well.
no other numbers are flat on top and open on the back.
Lol it doesn't match the 3 above it at all.
-
who cares!
Well, me
Well, then I take that back. We sometimes care about things just because it is fun. Sorry if it sounded aggressive
-
Lol it doesn't match the 3 above it at all.
That is becaus the 3 you are seeing also misses a column of dots on the left side.
All numbers are made up of 5 colums of dots, but the 3 you recognize has only 4 colums visable.
-
It is a 5.
Nothing left to guess. All others can be ruled out with the dots that we actually see.
2 can be ruled out because there is one dot wrong in the upper left corner.
3 can be ruled out because there is one dot wrong in the lower left corner.
7 can be ruled out because there is one dot wrong in the lower left corner.
It looks like it could be an 8.
-
It looks like it could be an 8.
No, it cannot be an 8 because of the dot in the top left corner. Compare it to the other 8 there.
-
That is becaus the 3 you are seeing also misses a column of dots on the left side.
All numbers are made up of 5 colums of dots, but the 3 you recognize has only 4 colums visable.
Ok I can kinda see that.
-
It is a 5.
Nothing left to guess. All others can be ruled out with the dots that we actually see.
2 can be ruled out because there is one dot wrong in the upper left corner.
3 can be ruled out because there is one dot wrong in the lower left corner.
7 can be ruled out because there is one dot wrong in the lower left corner.
I think it's a 3, and I think the top one has also been cut off.
-
No, it cannot be an 8 because of the dot in the top left corner. Compare it to the other 8 there.
The top left and bottom right dots should line up entirely but it's a misprint so I don't think an eight can be discounted entirely:
(I used a rectangle to overlay to show the alignment against a known straight line)
-
This post did not contain any content.
That's a fucking J lmao
