From Snoop Dogg to Lap Dogg
-
Hero to zero, dude.
Dude was never a hero. I bet he secretly wishes he was half as cool as Eminem
-
Why? He wasn't paid to say this stupid shit.
Essentially he was. This is him saying I have no moral threshold and am available as an influencer to say and do whatever I am paid for. AKA I am still relevant to your agenda... Call me. It is the same as all the big tech CEOs bending to 47 after bending to diversity initiatives. People with no ethics or morals fly the banner of whomever has control and do so in ways the average person is far too stupid to process. 47 is hard pressed for black and minority supporters. For a leader of dogmatic tribal fools, aka an influencer, the vacuum of minority supporters for 47 is an open bounty for a very large paycheck in exchange for ethics especially in the Southeastern USA where any sway over potential Democratic voters is critical for the fascist republican agenda. Nothing is simple or straight forward when a person is at this level of political engagement and wealth.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Have fun performing those minstrel shows for your GOP leash holders, Toby…
-
This post did not contain any content.
Sounds like the bitchy ass dogg became the new anti-drug mascot:
"Drugs will make you so dumb you'll get scared of children asking questions"I mean, adoption? Wuzzat??? Izzit possibl?????
-
Bad faith argument. Equating two people that spend their lives together to an exclusively sexual kink is bunk. Grow up.
It's an abnormal relationship type with a dom and a sub. Just like homosexual relationships are abnormal relationships with non standard partners involved. One is just more abnormal than the other. Both raise questions about sex, as was the point with Snoops clip -- his kid explicitly asked about sex stuff, because he encountered the abnormal couple on screen. Snoop wasn't comfortable discussing that with his grandkid in a movie theatre, and felt put out. That's a valid response, no matter how many lgbtq+ people scream in nonsensical rage.
You may not like the point, but it doesn't make it invalid. Just like you may not like hetero people's reaction to homosexual content in kids media, but that doesn't make their reactions "wrong".
-
This post did not contain any content.
Celebrities can't even have the common decency to shut the fuck up.
Glad I haven't directly contributed to any celebrity's cash piles in years and years.
Arrrrrrr matey!!!!
-
This post did not contain any content.
Snoop is also a crypto bro that played at one of Trump's pre-inaugeration events. Fuck him, he's a tiny little man with small dick energy in 2025
https://www.revolt.tv/article/snoop-dogg-defends-crypto-ball-appearance-for-trump-inauguration
-
I don't know if hypocrisy is the right term. Maybe in an extremely broad sense but then it starts to lose its meaning.
the man has financed and produced lesbian pornos. i don't think it's that broad.
-
If you put a bunch of hard core BDSM content into a movie for kids, it'd be considered inappropriate. Even if the BDSM community argued we have 'no problem' exposing kids to other kinds of relationships. It'd prompt similar uncomfortable questions for adults, and I reckon could lead to negative interactions that could damage the parent/child relationship.
No matter how you spin it, lgbtq+ gender stuff is abnormal, and applies to a relatively small minority of people in the overall population. Forcing those conversations onto hetero couples is inappropriate. Children of lgbtq+ couples may/can have those conversations earlier, as their households will likely encounter the questions regardless -- just like a family of hard core BDSM practitioners would need to explain to their kids why mommy and daddy have a dungeon in the basement. That doesn't mean every kid, and every family, should go through the same crap. Especially if, as a non-member of that community, your response will almost definitely be "wrong" according to that community.
Are you seriously drawing a parallel between putting hardcore bdsm content in a kids movie and a kids film that features a same sex couple!?
Having a same sex couple in a kids film is no more inappropriate than portraying an interracial couple. I find it ridiculous to say it's inappropriate to portray something simply because it's uncommon.
Incidentally, the equivocation of LGBTQ+ portrayals in media with that of explicit pornographic content is a position held by bigots who wish to erase the existence of non-heterosexual people.
-
Snoop turned into a fucking pussy.
Yeah, what a soft ass human being. Soft constitution (lack of integrity) and soft morals make for a pathetic excuse for a human being.
-
This post did not contain any content.
People getting angry about a comment made three years ago like it was just said today... Im getting reddit karma chasing vibes.
-
I recognize this is a meme, but is there an actual citation on where and when he said this? I want to hate him for it, but I also want to do my due diligence.
He's on the front page of Fox News- they love him for it
-
This post did not contain any content.
Snoop has got to be the biggest sellout in the entire history of music.
-
It's an abnormal relationship type with a dom and a sub. Just like homosexual relationships are abnormal relationships with non standard partners involved. One is just more abnormal than the other. Both raise questions about sex, as was the point with Snoops clip -- his kid explicitly asked about sex stuff, because he encountered the abnormal couple on screen. Snoop wasn't comfortable discussing that with his grandkid in a movie theatre, and felt put out. That's a valid response, no matter how many lgbtq+ people scream in nonsensical rage.
You may not like the point, but it doesn't make it invalid. Just like you may not like hetero people's reaction to homosexual content in kids media, but that doesn't make their reactions "wrong".
no. Snoop is a fucking idiot and this comment is stupid too. Watch this: "Same sex couples can adopt kids that don't have parents of their own". DONE. Your comment reads like it was copy/pasted from 1980 about how interracial dating is an abomination but you just changed a few words.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Its reallly funny watching this dude who put his name on multiple porn movies featuring copious amounts of lesbian sex clutch his pearls over a depiction of a lesbian couple in a children's movie.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I feel like I've got whiplash over the general public's perception of Snoop over the last decade or so
-
This post did not contain any content.
I hate this argument. "You people can't exist in public because I might have to talk to my stupid kids".
-
Its reallly funny watching this dude who put his name on multiple porn movies featuring copious amounts of lesbian sex clutch his pearls over a depiction of a lesbian couple in a children's movie.
That really adds to the evidence that he's always been a sell out.
Its obvious in retrospect but now that he's a right wing grifter its hard to avoid now.
-
I hate this argument. "You people can't exist in public because I might have to talk to my stupid kids".
wrote last edited by [email protected]No.
you people can't exist in public or stories because i made my kids stupid bigots, and seeing you might make them question that and make q lot more work for me if i want them to be as stupid and bigoted as i am
I know this, because my grandma said this shit to me about literally this asshole. He made my shitty racist grandma half correct about her shitty racism.
Edit: Fuck him with a three foot wide strap on that needs to be worn by two women who are making out in front of his grandkid.
-
It's wild to me that someone who got rich selling songs to teens about fucking bitches, selling drugs and killing cops could keep a straight have (edit: face! Straight face!) while saying he's offended about anything.
I don't see whats wrong with any of that.
