Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Lemmy Shitpost
  3. Why aren't you creating more workers??

Why aren't you creating more workers??

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Lemmy Shitpost
lemmyshitpost
127 Posts 84 Posters 1 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • H [email protected]

    By taxing corporations and reversing this insane wealth concentration.

    oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zoneO This user is from outside of this forum
    oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zoneO This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #17

    Mhmm the uber wealthy have all the toys that the rest of the population could ever dream of. Taking away their extra ones allows you to pay for everyone else to get the level of care they deserve. Even then you will have an absurd amount of surplus that can be used to pay for decades of services that the general population needs while still letting the rich have some of their toys.

    F O 2 Replies Last reply
    1
    • G [email protected]

      The problem developed nations are currently facing is that we need enough young people working to continue to support the current population as it ages and retires. The absolute population probably doesn't need to be as big as it is (unless you plan on starting a war like Russia for example) but it's not clear how to manage a reducing population gracefully.

      sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
      sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #18

      I think it is worth figuring out how to manage it - the alternative isn't super sustainable. The other thing is that it is like a 50 year challenge, which isn't insurmountable.

      A 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C [email protected]

        We need some more people. Much as I agree as the future is bleak, if we all simply stopped procreating then there wouldn't really be any point to anything and truly no reason to want to make the world better. Can't get to Star Trek future without a future.

        sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
        sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.worldS This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #19

        I don't think I mean a complete stop. I mean like a managed approach of tax incentives that over time encourage smaller families. Predicting and paying for degrees or training so we have a workforce that can fit into the economy easily. And a targeted immigration policy scaled to supplement gaps in the workforce or population.

        unconsequential@slrpnk.netU 1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • G [email protected]

          The problem developed nations are currently facing is that we need enough young people working to continue to support the current population as it ages and retires. The absolute population probably doesn't need to be as big as it is (unless you plan on starting a war like Russia for example) but it's not clear how to manage a reducing population gracefully.

          L This user is from outside of this forum
          L This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #20

          Certainly not by letting these dirty foreigners in the country. Those wild people with their 50 kids... wait.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ininewcrow@lemmy.caI [email protected]

            Capitalist Corporations: .... hmmmm .... I guess there's no choice .... artificial human breeding it is!

            W This user is from outside of this forum
            W This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #21

            Then they do the calculation on the costs to raise the children and decide it's not economically viable.

            ininewcrow@lemmy.caI A 2 Replies Last reply
            1
            • oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zoneO [email protected]

              Mhmm the uber wealthy have all the toys that the rest of the population could ever dream of. Taking away their extra ones allows you to pay for everyone else to get the level of care they deserve. Even then you will have an absurd amount of surplus that can be used to pay for decades of services that the general population needs while still letting the rich have some of their toys.

              F This user is from outside of this forum
              F This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #22

              To me, that's the most disgusting part: they could live the most lavish lifestyle possible and not put a dent in their savings.

              Nobody deserves that kind of wealth, nor should any one person control that much wealth. All those billions they're sitting on are funds that should have been allocated for better education, healthcare, transportation improvements and upgrades, affordable housing, etc.

              1 Reply Last reply
              3
              • ininewcrow@lemmy.caI [email protected]

                Capitalist Corporations: .... hmmmm .... I guess there's no choice .... artificial human breeding it is!

                C This user is from outside of this forum
                C This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #23

                Capitalism would also charge for every part of the process, raising the price as some techno feudal lord thinks they can find the right balance between extinction pricing and maximum shareholder value.

                P 1 Reply Last reply
                5
                • C [email protected]

                  Want higher birthrates? Just convince people that tomorrow will be better than today.

                  That's how you see a spike in birth rates.

                  To maintain a steady birthrate, just convince potential parents that the world will not be any worse for their children than it is today.

                  See, easy.

                  E This user is from outside of this forum
                  E This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #24

                  You said ban birth control and porn? Got it.

                  K O B 3 Replies Last reply
                  28
                  • M [email protected]

                    why would I want to bring somebody into this world. they'd only have to fight for basic things like "let's be nice to each other" and "maybe we should pool our money to spend it on big things that benefit us all"

                    fuck that. I'll live my little servile life as a cog in the machine as best I can, and then I'll die. and the dumb fucks who won't stop breeding while they try to make things worse for their children will repopulate the earth

                    B This user is from outside of this forum
                    B This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #25

                    No you don't understand. We're the most prosperous we've ever been at any point in time. There was literally no other time better than this. Life is wonderful in every way

                    /s

                    I'm generally a happy person but I hate people who say this.

                    Q 1 Reply Last reply
                    7
                    • E [email protected]

                      You said ban birth control and porn? Got it.

                      K This user is from outside of this forum
                      K This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #26

                      Track everything people do and arrest them for unauthorised opinions? Got it.

                      T 1 Reply Last reply
                      13
                      • F [email protected]

                        I’d put a baby in you. Not like through sex. just standard surgical procedure

                        unconsequential@slrpnk.netU This user is from outside of this forum
                        unconsequential@slrpnk.netU This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by
                        #27

                        Elon, that’s enough. Go home.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        3
                        • ininewcrow@lemmy.caI [email protected]

                          Just find someone with similar dumpster fires, then you'll both burn in the passions of what you love

                          Also, thanks for mentioning DINK - Double Income No Kids .... never heard of that before and now I learned something new.

                          K This user is from outside of this forum
                          K This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote last edited by
                          #28

                          Currently living that live and fuck me is life easy right now. Cats instead of kids is a very tempting option.

                          troyunrau@lemmy.caT 1 Reply Last reply
                          3
                          • W [email protected]

                            Then they do the calculation on the costs to raise the children and decide it's not economically viable.

                            ininewcrow@lemmy.caI This user is from outside of this forum
                            ininewcrow@lemmy.caI This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote last edited by
                            #29

                            It would be economically viable up to a certain age. And if you maintained a certain age average, costs could be easily maintained to sustainable levels.

                            When you start analyzing the world and people as a series of costs and expenses, it's very easy to find solutions.

                            As humans, we've already done that many times before .... most recently in the 1940s on an industrial scale .... we are capable of doing it again.

                            L 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.worldS [email protected]

                              I don't think I mean a complete stop. I mean like a managed approach of tax incentives that over time encourage smaller families. Predicting and paying for degrees or training so we have a workforce that can fit into the economy easily. And a targeted immigration policy scaled to supplement gaps in the workforce or population.

                              unconsequential@slrpnk.netU This user is from outside of this forum
                              unconsequential@slrpnk.netU This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote last edited by
                              #30

                              Most places are actually experiencing a birth rate decline. South Korea is having statistically less than one child per woman. Other places like Europe are also projected to shrink.

                              So, it’s already happening, that’s why countries are freaking out and trying to force births now. The policy shift in the US on abortion isn’t based on religion, it’s economics.

                              US birth rate hit 1.6, a “stable” birth rate is just over 2.1… mind you that’s the estimate for a population not growing or declining.

                              A 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • balderdash9@lemmy.zipB [email protected]
                                This post did not contain any content.
                                N This user is from outside of this forum
                                N This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote last edited by
                                #31

                                A friend of mine has three kids and works 70 hours a week. He is not able to make enough to support his family, and social services have been cut so much that his only option is to take out a personal loan, which will only make his problem worse.

                                B G 2 Replies Last reply
                                18
                                • E [email protected]

                                  You said ban birth control and porn? Got it.

                                  O This user is from outside of this forum
                                  O This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #32

                                  Also homosexuality, except for the wealthy.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  8
                                  • M [email protected]

                                    why would I want to bring somebody into this world. they'd only have to fight for basic things like "let's be nice to each other" and "maybe we should pool our money to spend it on big things that benefit us all"

                                    fuck that. I'll live my little servile life as a cog in the machine as best I can, and then I'll die. and the dumb fucks who won't stop breeding while they try to make things worse for their children will repopulate the earth

                                    O This user is from outside of this forum
                                    O This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #33

                                    No but you dont understand, the population is declining! It's so apocalyptic!

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.worldS [email protected]

                                      Dumb question: do we really need more people? It feels very much like technology/productivity will allow us to support a good lifestyle with fewer people.

                                      O This user is from outside of this forum
                                      O This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote last edited by [email protected]
                                      #34

                                      We? No. Capitalism? Yes.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      5
                                      • H [email protected]

                                        By taxing corporations and reversing this insane wealth concentration.

                                        O This user is from outside of this forum
                                        O This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote last edited by [email protected]
                                        #35

                                        No fuck that shit. Vote for the rich. Vote for their families. Vote for the fuckers who brutalize us on their behalf.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        1
                                        • oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zoneO [email protected]

                                          Mhmm the uber wealthy have all the toys that the rest of the population could ever dream of. Taking away their extra ones allows you to pay for everyone else to get the level of care they deserve. Even then you will have an absurd amount of surplus that can be used to pay for decades of services that the general population needs while still letting the rich have some of their toys.

                                          O This user is from outside of this forum
                                          O This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #36

                                          What if we, instead if taking their toys, just voted for them?

                                          They are a menace. They have ruined our earth and stolen our futures. They should lose everything. Fuck compromise; you'd have to fight just as hard for it; just take all of it. Vote for them all. Vote for their vile spawn too. Put them all in elected office.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups