From Snoop Dogg to Lap Dogg
-
Just a same sex relationship lol
Right but you see how the two aren't necessarily related?
Except that lesbians really tend to enjoy drugs?
-
Have fun performing those minstrel shows for your GOP leash holders, Toby…
wrote last edited by [email protected]Thank you for hitting harder than 'he did druvs, how dare he be a bigot'. This one id projectvsomewhere shitty calvin can see from his window.
-
Right because lesbians should only exist in pornos (like the GGW ones Snoop promoted at one point). Definitely not in real life, right Snoop?
Fucks sake, we can't depict two people in love because you can't explain it to your grandson? Should we not depict space travel or is he a rocket scientist that we don't know about?
This is the good shit.
Also, ftl, lasers, jetpacks, the wheel...
-
Why? He wasn't paid to say this stupid shit.
He played at Trump's inauguration. He's a fascist.
-
No.
you people can't exist in public or stories because i made my kids stupid bigots, and seeing you might make them question that and make q lot more work for me if i want them to be as stupid and bigoted as i am
I know this, because my grandma said this shit to me about literally this asshole. He made my shitty racist grandma half correct about her shitty racism.
Edit: Fuck him with a three foot wide strap on that needs to be worn by two women who are making out in front of his grandkid.
... What?
Snoop Dogg made your grandma right about being racist?
-
It's an abnormal relationship type with a dom and a sub. Just like homosexual relationships are abnormal relationships with non standard partners involved. One is just more abnormal than the other. Both raise questions about sex, as was the point with Snoops clip -- his kid explicitly asked about sex stuff, because he encountered the abnormal couple on screen. Snoop wasn't comfortable discussing that with his grandkid in a movie theatre, and felt put out. That's a valid response, no matter how many lgbtq+ people scream in nonsensical rage.
You may not like the point, but it doesn't make it invalid. Just like you may not like hetero people's reaction to homosexual content in kids media, but that doesn't make their reactions "wrong".
Do you believe it's unacceptable for two people of the same sex to hold hands in a public park?
-
That really adds to the evidence that he's always been a sell out.
Its obvious in retrospect but now that he's a right wing grifter its hard to avoid now.
I always thought Dre and Snoop were badass since 2001, with music at least, I know they were pretty shitty back in the day. Then I saw Snoop in a music video with Katy Perry and have hated him since for being such a money grubbing sellout.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Here's your next target Pearl clutchers.
-
... What?
Snoop Dogg made your grandma right about being racist?
wrote last edited by [email protected]About one thing she said out of racism about specifically him.
Also, if hes against queer shit, he cant choose his name. What's his real name?
Edit: downthread says its 'calvin broadus'. Mr. Broad<s needs to shut his stupid fucking mouth; no fasch cock for him to suck in that theater. Especially not in front of his fucking grandkids.
-
This post did not contain any content.
“They probably adopted.” Not that hard.
-
Okay but nobody said that. They said 'how dare somebody who likes drugs and has done sex work hate someobe marginalized!'
wrote last edited by [email protected]i'm reading it as a dig on things that are indicative of his general demeanour and the way he has historically wished to be perceived. it's not about smoking weed and banging hoes (both of which i must point out are illegal in most of the world still), it's about being someone who hoes weeds and bangs smoke, and then drawing the line at a queer couple. it's not "a person", it's specifically snoop.
in that situation, him also having produced pornos lines up.
-
Dude was never a hero. I bet he secretly wishes he was half as cool as Eminem
He's 100% always been jealous of Eminem.
-
This post did not contain any content.
My son just started third grade. It is actually super easy to answer questions like this if you're a kind person who allows others to keep their humanity if they are different, and if you actually cultivate a relationship with your child.
Explaining how two women parent a child? Wow, that must be tough my snoop guy. Better to just hide from the public like a little bitch, as you might say.
I mean, I've had to address things like the topic of death because of a grandparent dying young and a future sibling ending in a miscarriage. And the original due date recently passed too. oof.
But thank fucking god that in my family's weakened state, none of us were assaulted by the vile image of two women holding hands and kissing a baby on the head at the same time.
Check this out though Dogg: if you were sent back 50 years in time with white skin and no memory, within a week you'd be fighting to bring back segregation. Cunt.
-
i'm reading it as a dig on things that are indicative of his general demeanour and the way he has historically wished to be perceived. it's not about smoking weed and banging hoes (both of which i must point out are illegal in most of the world still), it's about being someone who hoes weeds and bangs smoke, and then drawing the line at a queer couple. it's not "a person", it's specifically snoop.
in that situation, him also having produced pornos lines up.
wrote last edited by [email protected]And thats problematic in just... So many fucking ways.
Like i genuinely dont even know where to start, but maybe: it feels a little homophobic, and also you're accepting the puritanical cultural framework of what is and isn't transgressive, that makes a drag queen reading books to kids more outrageous than avpriest fucking them.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Shit man, I ha e to explain things to a kid. What kind of world is this?! Just teach them the same ignorant shit you were raised on Snoop, why not. It's the world you want.
-
About one thing she said out of racism about specifically him.
Also, if hes against queer shit, he cant choose his name. What's his real name?
Edit: downthread says its 'calvin broadus'. Mr. Broad<s needs to shut his stupid fucking mouth; no fasch cock for him to suck in that theater. Especially not in front of his fucking grandkids.
Calvin Broadus. Not so flashy now, eh Dogg?!
-
My son just started third grade. It is actually super easy to answer questions like this if you're a kind person who allows others to keep their humanity if they are different, and if you actually cultivate a relationship with your child.
Explaining how two women parent a child? Wow, that must be tough my snoop guy. Better to just hide from the public like a little bitch, as you might say.
I mean, I've had to address things like the topic of death because of a grandparent dying young and a future sibling ending in a miscarriage. And the original due date recently passed too. oof.
But thank fucking god that in my family's weakened state, none of us were assaulted by the vile image of two women holding hands and kissing a baby on the head at the same time.
Check this out though Dogg: if you were sent back 50 years in time with white skin and no memory, within a week you'd be fighting to bring back segregation. Cunt.
Also, if hes anti queer, he needs to use his REAL name-im told calvin broadus.
-
Calvin Broadus. Not so flashy now, eh Dogg?!
Omg thats amazing
-
Shit man, I ha e to explain things to a kid. What kind of world is this?! Just teach them the same ignorant shit you were raised on Snoop, why not. It's the world you want.
His name isn't snoop, it's calvin.
If he cant tolerate queerness or stuff that's hard to explain, he's gotta use his real name.
-
Are you seriously drawing a parallel between putting hardcore bdsm content in a kids movie and a kids film that features a same sex couple!?
Having a same sex couple in a kids film is no more inappropriate than portraying an interracial couple. I find it ridiculous to say it's inappropriate to portray something simply because it's uncommon.
Incidentally, the equivocation of LGBTQ+ portrayals in media with that of explicit pornographic content is a position held by bigots who wish to erase the existence of non-heterosexual people.
Poor word choice perhaps, wasn't intending it to be taken as 'hard core' graphic sex bdsm, but more hardcore bdsm as in a couple clearly into that lifestyle - like a dad that wears a collar or whatnot. The latter would still be inappropriate as it would prompt questions difficult to answer for parents, and topics that are reasonably beyond a kids maturity level. It'd be fine in a pg-13, but not in a G.
