Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Microblog Memes
  3. Language

Language

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Microblog Memes
microblogmemes
238 Posts 117 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N [email protected]

    https://mastodon.social/@Gargron/115093185284473606

    tomenzgg@midwest.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    tomenzgg@midwest.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by [email protected]
    #89

    I'm probably going to spam this around a bit, since most people don't seem to know about it, but a reminder that FuriLabs has a (GNU+)Linux phone with decent spec.s and the ability to run Android app.s (from what I've heard) pretty decently: https://furilabs.com/

    Biggest drawback is it's based on Halium. Usual growing pains of a new product/company apply but apparently the company is pretty responsive and their dev.s have worked with customers to get things like calling working with the carrier and bands of their country where it hasn't worked before so improvements move pretty quickly.

    Collection of different experiences I've variously seen online over the last year or so:

    • https://clehaxze.tw/gemlog/2025/07-20-flx1-actually-usable-linux-phone.gmi
    • https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41839326
    • https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1fa1ljn/furilabs_flx1/
    • https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1j46f2w/flx1_linux_phone_display_out/
    • https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/03/furiphone_flx1/

    I don't own one, myself, so I can't give any personal experience but I've seen it around for a few years now but most people don't seem to even know about it. Maybe there's a reason for that? But none I've ever seen anyone say.

    B B J 3 Replies Last reply
    10
    • N [email protected]

      https://mastodon.social/@Gargron/115093185284473606

      gmtom@lemmy.worldG This user is from outside of this forum
      gmtom@lemmy.worldG This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #90

      Anyone that makes this argumrnt needs to work in a public IT support role for at least a year.

      Then you will understsnd why your average user should not be given unrestricted freedom on their device.

      S L J 3 Replies Last reply
      1
      • 5 [email protected]

        That just sounds like the system needs a separate "Admin" mode to do things like that. Your mom can take the risk of messing with that herself (which can be very educational!), or leave that for you or someone else to handle. But that would let her make a more informed choice, even without technical ability.

        mudman@fedia.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
        mudman@fedia.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #91

        Sure. I don't disagree with that. In fact, that's how it currently works on Android, more or less. It's actually looser now than it has been in the past.

        But "informed choice without technical ability" is not a thing. You can't be informed if you don't understand what you're doing. People online that more or less understand computers but don't necessarily understand how other people interact with computers tend to miss how this works. My mom doesn't choose to take risks or not, she won't read what's on the screen and if she reads it she won't understand it, and if she understands it she won't trust it, because she doesn't have the knowledge to distinguish a genuine message from the OS trying to ask for confirmation from a janky physhing request.

        My mom thinks Whatsapp messages can hack her bank account and freaks out every time her phone asks her to reboot for an update. She doesn't have the time or interest to get to a place where she can change that, and more to the point she shouldn't have to. It's prefectly fine to buy a device that will only let you do the things you want to do and won't let you do the rest.

        As you say, that device just needs some process by which someone who cares and knows how to do more stuff can reclaim full access.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • gmtom@lemmy.worldG [email protected]

          Anyone that makes this argumrnt needs to work in a public IT support role for at least a year.

          Then you will understsnd why your average user should not be given unrestricted freedom on their device.

          S This user is from outside of this forum
          S This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by [email protected]
          #92

          Even people who are not being supported by any IT department at all? For example, home users. If they break their device they will learn how to not break their next one and therefore become more technologically proficient.

          gmtom@lemmy.worldG S 2 Replies Last reply
          4
          • M [email protected]

            Yeah this is where I'm at too, there is no reason these device makers should be locking us out of doing what we want with our phones. Their app store can exist along side other install options and compete on usability instead of monopoly.

            mudman@fedia.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
            mudman@fedia.ioM This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by [email protected]
            #93

            Yep. I don't need Google to let me install apks freely and I don't need them to host everything on the Play store with zero supervision.

            But I do need F-Droid to keep working and to be able to install software that Google has zero visibility on, or a way to unlock my device to be able to sideload stuff. There is zero reasonable argument to say that Google is the only valid arbiter of signed software on the planet.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • gmtom@lemmy.worldG [email protected]

              Have you people never worked in IT support? Like its all fair and good that you, a power user, dont want the OS to restrict you at all. But for your averrage person to be treated the same is just asking for disaster.

              S This user is from outside of this forum
              S This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by [email protected]
              #94

              Can't IT lock things down if they so desire? That is the owner of the device using it as they see fit: Locking it down so the non technical users of the device can't break it. That you keep suggesting that devices should come out of the box restricted would make your IT job obsolete and in fact impossible to perform.

              Edit: And before you ask yes I have worked in IT support, although I currently do not.

              gmtom@lemmy.worldG 1 Reply Last reply
              10
              • Q [email protected]

                Boot2Gecko is a thing: it's called KaiOS. It targets lower tech devices though and is just as locked down as Android, potentially even more actually.

                I'm interested: why do you want it? I'm not a big fan of the idea of web development being the standard

                I This user is from outside of this forum
                I This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #95

                Let me answer your question with a question: How many things do you do with your phone that aren't also able to be accomplished with a website already? I'd be willing to bet that the answer is in the single digits. And for most of those, that limitation is likely to be entirely arbitrary, instituted by a developer as an anti-consumer form of lock-in.

                Delivering application-like experiences via the web allows users to make accessibility changes to that experience without the developer needing to support it explicitly. It also allows users to implement plugins that extend and improve their experience, by removing undesirable content or adding functionality that you haven't provided. And because browsers are built on open standards, there's no longer any device ecosystem lock-in; I should be able to access all of the websites I want to from any browser on any device. Users could even build their own bespoke applications, without the need to enable a developer mode on their phone or get a certification from a megacorp.

                And because downloadable and cacheable progressive web apps are a thing, as well as local storage options for browsers, the experience for an end-user of a browser-only phone wouldn't need to be any different in low-signal or high-latency situations.

                The web is a mature and proven platform for delivering arbitrary code and data, plugins make the web more accessible and easier to use, and web standards make the world more open. It's not a perfect platform, of course, but it's the one we've got; I think making it the default rather than the fallback for the devices most people use more than any other would be a great boon for the world at large.

                Q 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • M [email protected]

                  I don't know about you, but my Pixel 6a already does this. When I go to install an APK not from the app store directly it warms me, requires me to acknowledge that the APK was downloaded through Firefox, and acknowledge what permissions it is requesting.

                  I This user is from outside of this forum
                  I This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #96

                  Yes, the problem is that Android is talking about requiring developer verification at install time; as I understand it, without allowing an override.

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • 5 [email protected]

                    To be clear, Kolanaki is saying that that is not how an OS should behave.

                    desmosthenes@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                    desmosthenes@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by [email protected]
                    #97

                    oh yea I agree I was just venting further; prefer less hand holding

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    3
                    • N [email protected]

                      https://mastodon.social/@Gargron/115093185284473606

                      L This user is from outside of this forum
                      L This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #98

                      If I ever go insane and write a manifesto this will be on it.

                      S L 2 Replies Last reply
                      20
                      • gmtom@lemmy.worldG [email protected]

                        Anyone that makes this argumrnt needs to work in a public IT support role for at least a year.

                        Then you will understsnd why your average user should not be given unrestricted freedom on their device.

                        L This user is from outside of this forum
                        L This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by
                        #99

                        Why should I suffer because of you lot?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        5
                        • Q [email protected]

                          Boot2Gecko is a thing: it's called KaiOS. It targets lower tech devices though and is just as locked down as Android, potentially even more actually.

                          I'm interested: why do you want it? I'm not a big fan of the idea of web development being the standard

                          I This user is from outside of this forum
                          I This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote last edited by
                          #100

                          As for KaiOS, I don't think that's really a good successor of Boot2Gecko; from what I've seen they went the app route, which kind of fundamentally violates the spirit of what B2G was supposed to be.

                          Q 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • tomenzgg@midwest.socialT [email protected]

                            I'm probably going to spam this around a bit, since most people don't seem to know about it, but a reminder that FuriLabs has a (GNU+)Linux phone with decent spec.s and the ability to run Android app.s (from what I've heard) pretty decently: https://furilabs.com/

                            Biggest drawback is it's based on Halium. Usual growing pains of a new product/company apply but apparently the company is pretty responsive and their dev.s have worked with customers to get things like calling working with the carrier and bands of their country where it hasn't worked before so improvements move pretty quickly.

                            Collection of different experiences I've variously seen online over the last year or so:

                            • https://clehaxze.tw/gemlog/2025/07-20-flx1-actually-usable-linux-phone.gmi
                            • https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41839326
                            • https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1fa1ljn/furilabs_flx1/
                            • https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1j46f2w/flx1_linux_phone_display_out/
                            • https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/03/furiphone_flx1/

                            I don't own one, myself, so I can't give any personal experience but I've seen it around for a few years now but most people don't seem to even know about it. Maybe there's a reason for that? But none I've ever seen anyone say.

                            B This user is from outside of this forum
                            B This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote last edited by
                            #101

                            I can’t decide if that name is amazing or very unfortunate.

                            Is it pronounced “Furry Phone” or “Fury Phone?”

                            Because one of those is much better than the other. I’ll let my fellow Lemmings guess which I prefer.

                            U 1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • Q [email protected]

                              Boot2Gecko is a thing: it's called KaiOS. It targets lower tech devices though and is just as locked down as Android, potentially even more actually.

                              I'm interested: why do you want it? I'm not a big fan of the idea of web development being the standard

                              B This user is from outside of this forum
                              B This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote last edited by
                              #102

                              I, too, hate web dev being the standard. It's inevitable though. Mostly OS agnostic, easy to learn, etc.

                              Q 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • kolanaki@pawb.socialK [email protected]

                                Some of these comments are wild.

                                The OS should not at all stop me from doing what I want to do. Ever. Not even if that means I can fuck it up.

                                They can warn me when I attempt to do things that could fuck shit up. They can make it a bit harder to navigate to certain things so I'm less likely to fuck shit up. But it's my god damn hardware. I should be able to run and configure the software on it as I see fit.

                                M This user is from outside of this forum
                                M This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote last edited by
                                #103

                                But we subsidised the cost of your phone so we could make sweet sweet recurring revenue off your usage habits and targeted advertising!

                                You wouldn't want to take that away from us would you? Won't SOMEBODY think of the shareholders?!

                                C 1 Reply Last reply
                                23
                                • tomenzgg@midwest.socialT [email protected]

                                  I'm probably going to spam this around a bit, since most people don't seem to know about it, but a reminder that FuriLabs has a (GNU+)Linux phone with decent spec.s and the ability to run Android app.s (from what I've heard) pretty decently: https://furilabs.com/

                                  Biggest drawback is it's based on Halium. Usual growing pains of a new product/company apply but apparently the company is pretty responsive and their dev.s have worked with customers to get things like calling working with the carrier and bands of their country where it hasn't worked before so improvements move pretty quickly.

                                  Collection of different experiences I've variously seen online over the last year or so:

                                  • https://clehaxze.tw/gemlog/2025/07-20-flx1-actually-usable-linux-phone.gmi
                                  • https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41839326
                                  • https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1fa1ljn/furilabs_flx1/
                                  • https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/1j46f2w/flx1_linux_phone_display_out/
                                  • https://www.theregister.com/2025/02/03/furiphone_flx1/

                                  I don't own one, myself, so I can't give any personal experience but I've seen it around for a few years now but most people don't seem to even know about it. Maybe there's a reason for that? But none I've ever seen anyone say.

                                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #104

                                  Intriguing! I'm concerned about the "advanced power management algorithms" they're putting up front and center without clarifying. My current phone (OnePlus) is very aggressive about that and just kills my alarm clock in the middle of the night once in a while and breaks other apps, even with optimizations disabled and the phone plugged in. Furiphone isn't listed on DontKillMyApp and I didn't see anything with a quick search, have you heard anything about how it does on that?

                                  Also that size, oof. Mine is already too big and this is noticeably bigger in all 3 dimensions.

                                  tomenzgg@midwest.socialT A 2 Replies Last reply
                                  3
                                  • desmosthenes@lemmy.worldD [email protected]

                                    meh both on mac and windows you’re not the true admin of the machine. mac requires disabling SIP and some others to even be able to delete default applications for example and don’t get me started on windows. linux ftw (as I type this from my old ass ios device)

                                    K This user is from outside of this forum
                                    K This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #105

                                    I think that just falls under "make it a bit harder to navigate to certain things so I'm less likely to fuck shit up."

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    5
                                    • B This user is from outside of this forum
                                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #106

                                      I argue that would be even more of a use case for the device owner to have such control.

                                      Then you'd have rights to control which software your mom can install on the phone.

                                      mudman@fedia.ioM 1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • B [email protected]

                                        Intriguing! I'm concerned about the "advanced power management algorithms" they're putting up front and center without clarifying. My current phone (OnePlus) is very aggressive about that and just kills my alarm clock in the middle of the night once in a while and breaks other apps, even with optimizations disabled and the phone plugged in. Furiphone isn't listed on DontKillMyApp and I didn't see anything with a quick search, have you heard anything about how it does on that?

                                        Also that size, oof. Mine is already too big and this is noticeably bigger in all 3 dimensions.

                                        tomenzgg@midwest.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        tomenzgg@midwest.socialT This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #107

                                        Ooof; yeah: that'd be a dealbreaker for me, too. I've got a OnePlus, as well (Nord N20), and, while I can definitely tell there's some battery optimization going on, it's never killed my alarms; it's the only alarm clock I use so somewhat vital.

                                        Unfortunately, I haven't heard anything (yet). Most of anything I've heard about them has been from "static" sources (like the above); I don't hang out in any chatrooms or the like they may have. I do know they have an account on the Fediverse, though (@[email protected]), so you may be able to ask them directly?

                                        B 1 Reply Last reply
                                        2
                                        • jqubed@lemmy.worldJ [email protected]

                                          This does feel like a bit of a double-standard to me. I’ve hated how Microsoft and Apple have introduced app stores on Windows and macOS and try to push people to only install from there instead of directly from the developer. And yet on Linux the advice seems to be never ever download directly from the developer; you should only download from the package repository provided by your OS (which sure feels like an App Store). And that package probably wasn’t even provided by the developer or the OS but some random volunteer that you just assume has good intentions.

                                          J This user is from outside of this forum
                                          J This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #108

                                          And yet on Linux the advice seems to be never ever download directly from the developer

                                          That's just advice for making life easy for new people, because distro-packaged software is more likely to work well with the operating system. I run packages from devs, even nightly automated builds of stuff, all the time.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups