EU OS aims to free the European public sector desktop
-
What is Arc? Arch? Arch takes too much attention to maintain (don't you dare to miss that update or don't pay enough attention to the changelog). It is a good OS for enthusiasts loving tinkering with OS, but an really awful offer for people who need OS.
Yes, of course Arch. But ypu're still dodging my question. You were saying other distributions were close to Corpos compared to Debian. We weren't talking about the benefits or drawbacks of specific distros
-
Yes, of course Arch. But ypu're still dodging my question. You were saying other distributions were close to Corpos compared to Debian. We weren't talking about the benefits or drawbacks of specific distros
-
Suse exists and is european, why would you need another distro?
Who knows. And maybe this proposed project will go nowhere. But it would be cool if the European public sector does end up using Linux on the desktop.
As always, the year of the Linux desktop is just around the corner...
-
You were saying other distributions were close to Corpos compared to Debian.
I never said that. I said:
it is as far from corporations as possible and it works
And I want to know why you think something like Arch linux is "close to corporations" in comparison
-
Suse exists and is european, why would you need another distro?
sigh relevant xkcd
-
It is OS. OS doesn't need leadership or direction. For these things you should address to MacOS. They have a leader, direction and all that.
Debian is just a GNU/Linux OS to run programs.
Actually you need leadership and direction so you won't end up in current debian situation where they can't decide on anything where there is three suites of helper utils that do same thing but can't actually mandate usage of one. Where apt-get is still shipped ten years after apt becoming default and so on. It's a mess.
-
And I want to know why you think something like Arch linux is "close to corporations" in comparison
-
So what is your problem with Debian if you never expect to maintain it?
Moreover -- it is nice to have the same tool at home as you have at work. It's just easier.
i didn't say anything towards Debian being good or bad. I don't know enough about it to make such a judgement. I merely pointed out that ease of maintainability by the end user is not an argument for organizations. As for home use, people who decide to use a Linux distro at home are not the main target here. Again, an organization will make a walled garden for their end users, so similarity ends being a relevant factor past the Desktop GUI. And whether you run Gnome, KDE or a different one does not depend on the distro itself.
-
Go to ignore. You're speaking with yourself and obviously are unable or unwilling to understand what I'm saying.
No, you just refuse to answer a simple question
-
A guy who works for the EU has proposed that Europe have its own Linux distro for European public sector use.
The plan is to base this distro on Fedora with KDE Plasma. I suppose Plasma is relatively similar to the Windows desktop, so it should be familiar for public sector employees.
Thoughts?
Why though? Some of the biggest distros aren't even based in the US but rather in Europe.
-
A guy who works for the EU has proposed that Europe have its own Linux distro for European public sector use.
The plan is to base this distro on Fedora with KDE Plasma. I suppose Plasma is relatively similar to the Windows desktop, so it should be familiar for public sector employees.
Thoughts?
Based on Fedora, run by Red Hat, an American company.
-
Why though? Some of the biggest distros aren't even based in the US but rather in Europe.
But who builds Debian?
-
This is pure marketing propaganda
(By the random guy who started the project, that is.)
-
A guy who works for the EU has proposed that Europe have its own Linux distro for European public sector use.
The plan is to base this distro on Fedora with KDE Plasma. I suppose Plasma is relatively similar to the Windows desktop, so it should be familiar for public sector employees.
Thoughts?
Great! Let's just make a new one instead of supporting one that's already well developed and widely adopted, which include countless of options. Surely they got time and effort to develop and market it, right??
-
A guy who works for the EU has proposed that Europe have its own Linux distro for European public sector use.
The plan is to base this distro on Fedora with KDE Plasma. I suppose Plasma is relatively similar to the Windows desktop, so it should be familiar for public sector employees.
Thoughts?
Maybe they start supporting open source instead of making new businesses out of it.
-
Based on Fedora, run by Red Hat, an American company.
They're owned by IBM.
-
A guy who works for the EU has proposed that Europe have its own Linux distro for European public sector use.
The plan is to base this distro on Fedora with KDE Plasma. I suppose Plasma is relatively similar to the Windows desktop, so it should be familiar for public sector employees.
Thoughts?
Does Linux have a good alternative to ActiveDirectory? Something where a central server can validate logins, send update commands remotely, integrate it with several other applications so users don't have to create an account for each different system?
-
No, you just refuse to answer a simple question
i read their statement as :
- Debian is "as far from corporations as possible" ...
- Other distros might be also "as far from corporations as possible" ... yet we don't care because what we say is :
it is as far from corporations as possible and it works
-
i read their statement as :
- Debian is "as far from corporations as possible" ...
- Other distros might be also "as far from corporations as possible" ... yet we don't care because what we say is :
it is as far from corporations as possible and it works
Possible, I still feel like it was used as a sort of USP for Debian and just wanted to know if theres something about other distros (apart from the obvious ones) that makes them in some way corpo controlled
-
Does Linux have a good alternative to ActiveDirectory? Something where a central server can validate logins, send update commands remotely, integrate it with several other applications so users don't have to create an account for each different system?
Does Linux have a good alternative to ActiveDirectory?
Centralized IAM, managed updates, and all of the other "stuff" that AD does is available for at least some Linux distributions but it's not free to use, at least not commercially. You're going to be paying Red Hat, SUSE, etc for these kinds of features.
