Has Xbox Considered Laying One Person Off Instead Of Thousands
-
Let me share my Xbox experience? I'm mid-40s. Owned Xboxes since literally the OG Xbox 1.
I originally bought this thing to play with my brother split screen. Nowadays I want to play split screen with my son.
Yet somehow there's no fucking split screen games anymore. The last two or three AAA games I purchased I played for a few hours and then never loaded again.
And the other day when I loaded up call of duty Black ops 3 to play zombies (this is like a 10 year old game now) I found that because I let my Xbox Gold live whatever the fuck subscription expire, I can't play "online" and use my unlocked items even though I'm doing local play.
So from this guy what in the fucking fuck xbox. This is some kind of device designed to clean out my wallet for eternity and not deliver what I actually want.
I pretty much exclusively use my Xbox as a YouTube player now.
Borderlands, sports, indie titles are still good options
-
This post did not contain any content.
I don't think it would change anything because all management there is the same. They don't play games.
-
Borderlands, sports, indie titles are still good options
You might be right, probably worth looking into. I just have so little time to invest in new titles or any learning curve or really any game that takes a ton of grinding before it's fun
-
You might be right, probably worth looking into. I just have so little time to invest in new titles or any learning curve or really any game that takes a ton of grinding before it's fun
You can but don't need to grind any of the Borderlands games until super late finished the game 3 times with the same character already end game, and by that time it's fun to just start a new character of a different class. Handsome collection, playing 2 in particular is the best. And that collection works for up to 4 player locally
-
Japan has laws that say executives must take a pay cut before they can lay anyone off
The place I work for is having an executive pay cut… but with tons of threats of other layoffs and chafing benefits for the worse. It’s really cool. I bet the top execs have pay cuts equal or less than one regular worker’s pay.
-
So going on a shopping spree and buying all those game studios wasn't a good idea huh. Who would have thought.
I wish companies couldn't buy other companies. That's how all the best things die
-
If you banned investing, the rich people who already have money would be the only ones who could afford to open businesses.
If you banned
investinggambling -
So going on a shopping spree and buying all those game studios wasn't a good idea huh. Who would have thought.
I feel like this is all driven by MS diving full force into AI stuff. Their capex is going to be insane so they’re cutting shit left and right to keep Wall Street happy while they set cash on fire trying to make AI something more than anime profile pic generators.
-
Let me share my Xbox experience? I'm mid-40s. Owned Xboxes since literally the OG Xbox 1.
I originally bought this thing to play with my brother split screen. Nowadays I want to play split screen with my son.
Yet somehow there's no fucking split screen games anymore. The last two or three AAA games I purchased I played for a few hours and then never loaded again.
And the other day when I loaded up call of duty Black ops 3 to play zombies (this is like a 10 year old game now) I found that because I let my Xbox Gold live whatever the fuck subscription expire, I can't play "online" and use my unlocked items even though I'm doing local play.
So from this guy what in the fucking fuck xbox. This is some kind of device designed to clean out my wallet for eternity and not deliver what I actually want.
I pretty much exclusively use my Xbox as a YouTube player now.
I’m having a similar experience with the PS5. Been playing since Gran Turismo on the PS1 and have it in the living room with multiple controllers. Thing is…like you said there’s no couch coop anymore, if 3 of us want to shoot zombies on the same map it just can’t but 2 player is there…with giant black bars on the sides to make it 4:3 on my 65” tv.
We’ve spent more time playing Balatro than COD the last few weeks, smaller cheaper games are simply a better deal right now with the price tag and all the mtx
-
Let me share my Xbox experience? I'm mid-40s. Owned Xboxes since literally the OG Xbox 1.
I originally bought this thing to play with my brother split screen. Nowadays I want to play split screen with my son.
Yet somehow there's no fucking split screen games anymore. The last two or three AAA games I purchased I played for a few hours and then never loaded again.
And the other day when I loaded up call of duty Black ops 3 to play zombies (this is like a 10 year old game now) I found that because I let my Xbox Gold live whatever the fuck subscription expire, I can't play "online" and use my unlocked items even though I'm doing local play.
So from this guy what in the fucking fuck xbox. This is some kind of device designed to clean out my wallet for eternity and not deliver what I actually want.
I pretty much exclusively use my Xbox as a YouTube player now.
That really sucks. Consoles these days are just pcs with expensive libraries. If you can muster playing on pc with your son, the games are cheaper and I highly recommend it. On steam, you can filter by local coop and hook up two controllers to get a similar experience. You can even try emulating older games like on the ps2.
-
So going on a shopping spree and buying all those game studios wasn't a good idea huh. Who would have thought.
Buying studios wasn't stupid.
Doing it and putting all their products on a subscription service is.
-
Buying studios wasn't stupid.
Doing it and putting all their products on a subscription service is.
Why? they have the most players AND money than they ever did in their existence. Stupid would be suggesting it was a bad idea
-
This post did not contain any content.
best they can do is lay off 10-30% and call record profits.
-
Which is why stock trading should be abolished and outlawed.
or at least heavily taxed, which almost never happens because everyone in congress commiting insider trading wouldnt want that.
-
So going on a shopping spree and buying all those game studios wasn't a good idea huh. Who would have thought.
That was just leveling the field of potential competitors.
-
Buying studios wasn't stupid.
Doing it and putting all their products on a subscription service is.
As much as the higher tiers of PSN aren't as good value as GamePass, it's certainly lead to higher quality games for Sony's platform as they can still get sales revenue from shorter or niche games, rather than just looking at a single figure and laying off whole studios.
I'd much rather pay money for a full game now (and I'll be honest, my day one purchases this gen are limited to games I'm really interested in), or wait and play on sub later (and it's about 18 months I think for games to go "free"), than have half a game on sub now and get nickle and dimed for the rest of it.
-
Why? they have the most players AND money than they ever did in their existence. Stupid would be suggesting it was a bad idea
Eh? They've been chasing the one-off Xbox 360 high for two generations now, and are nowhere near it. Sony have near full dominance in the console space. Valve have so much dominance in the PC space that they've got people to try Linux.
The aim of GamePass was that people would stream games and not need a console at all, and that just hasn't happened for them. Their entire gamble was on cloud gaming, and it's not paid off at all.
-
Eh? They've been chasing the one-off Xbox 360 high for two generations now, and are nowhere near it. Sony have near full dominance in the console space. Valve have so much dominance in the PC space that they've got people to try Linux.
The aim of GamePass was that people would stream games and not need a console at all, and that just hasn't happened for them. Their entire gamble was on cloud gaming, and it's not paid off at all.
wrote last edited by [email protected]Again, making more money than ever before is the definition of paying off
-
There should be a rule on how many people or how many times layoffs can happen before leadership gets let go instead.
wrote last edited by [email protected]over COVID, the company i worked for did the best possible thing: they called an all hands and said they didn’t want to let anyone go, but would likely need to unless everyone took a voluntary 20% pay cut for a bit… they expressed that not everyone is in the position to do that, and if you can’t you shouldn’t feel bad… executives and leadership making the decision took a 40% pay cut for the same period, and any profit that the company made went to reimburse people’s salaries in proportion to the amount they lost. because they were honest, and sacrificed more themselves the buy in was something like 95%, they didn’t have to fire anyone, and we ended up getting about half of it back…
-
Not necessarily, no. Other people with common aims would still be able to band together via nonprofits, credit unions, labor unions and the like.
It would actually be MUCH more effective once the most effective tool for exploding and concentrating wealth is out of the way.
wrote last edited by [email protected]also loans still exist regardless of investment like stocks, which is the way most small businesses start anyway
