Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. World News
  3. US to withdraw from NATO under Republican bill

US to withdraw from NATO under Republican bill

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved World News
world
346 Posts 186 Posters 2 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • B [email protected]

    Russia has an army that is capable of invading another country. The only country in NATO that have done that is the US.
    I don't think Russia invading the whole of the EU is a realistic possibility but grabbing a few ex Soviet countries off the border...

    A This user is from outside of this forum
    A This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by [email protected]
    #91

    asdf

    L B 2 Replies Last reply
    7
    • R [email protected]

      I keep getting this sinking feeling that this is all leading up to a precise and coordinated attack of evil.

      Russia bombards the EU, the US attacks Greenland and Canada, while Israel finally bulldozes Gaza and Iran. China takes Taiwan and the south sea.

      All at the same time so NATO is overwhelmed and can’t decisively defend it all without risking spreading too thin. No matter what happens, one of the bad guys gains ground.

      I honestly have no idea if this is even possible, it’s based on a dream I had a few weeks ago.

      Disturbing thought though.

      B This user is from outside of this forum
      B This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #92

      The thing is the EU is mostly concerned about Europe, while the US wants to play world police. So if China would invade Taiwan and NATO is without the US, I'm not sure they are going to get involved, it would open the gate for Russia. If the US is still part of NATO I'm not sure what will happen as it's not an article 5 event. So the other NATO countries are not automatically involved even if the US is.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • F [email protected]

        It was a talking point that Trump had in his first term. He tends not to let go of bad ideas once they get into his head.

        At the time, people didn't take it seriously. With the Ukraine War, Europe feels like it has to now. But it's going to be domestic production, not paying US MIC companies like Trump was thinking.

        B This user is from outside of this forum
        B This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #93

        The 5% is probably too much, but its realistically 3.5% the othet 1.5% can be spend on infrastructure (like make bridges strong enough so tanks can drive over them), on cyber defense and other things that are not weapons.

        Also it's about deterrence, when we spend enough Russia can't attack unless they match the spending, this is part why the Soviet Union collapsed.

        A 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • F [email protected]
          This post did not contain any content.
          G This user is from outside of this forum
          G This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #94

          Does the bill include all military installation closures and those that are on European territories? For example Greenland. If MAGA wants out, then GTFO and I do not want hear any crying afterwards because that will give the Europeans every excuse not purchase US made weapons. I'm certain US MIC lobbyists will weasel their way in to tear apart the bill.

          E 1 Reply Last reply
          31
          • M [email protected]

            I don't think the US military complex consider that "less undesirable" than basically any other possible outcome.

            ... well, it may be better in their minds than an asteroid destroying Earth before they can cash-out. Maybe. I'm not sure about this one...

            R This user is from outside of this forum
            R This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #95

            I don’t think the US military complex consider that “less undesirable” than basically any other possible outcome.

            Either I disagree about the preferences of those murder-weapons-vendors, or you misunderstood my intentional double-negative, whose purpose it was to emphasize that it is absolutely not desirable that budgets have to be increased for mass-murder weapons.

            I am saying the military industrial complex over in the divided states of fuck all and everyone, would absolutely prefer if people bought from them, less so as a cash-out but preferably as a permanent source of income. A privatized murder-weapons industry in the billions is the best way of ensuring we will never get lasting peace on this planet.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • A [email protected]

              The US is great at spending money in the military, but it absolutely sucks at actual war.

              Look how they wasted trillions in Afghanistan to surrender to the Taliban.

              the US military exists solely to funnel tax payer money to military shareholders.

              B This user is from outside of this forum
              B This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #96

              That was to funnel money, steal gold, and oil.

              A 1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • F [email protected]
                This post did not contain any content.
                Y This user is from outside of this forum
                Y This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #97

                The press I saw from nato meet where really disturbing as in they where blatantly sucking up on him.. so maybe there was something known already. Also the Iran stunt is incredible, what is happening?

                1 Reply Last reply
                5
                • eyekaytee@aussie.zoneE [email protected]

                  france was right all along

                  I This user is from outside of this forum
                  I This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #98

                  Yes, but what's the point? Nobody listens to France anyway, we are irrelevant. The only way to push our ideas is if somehow the EU embrace them.

                  And then we've got our own issues (doing nothing climate-related, lack of financing for science, nazi ideas getting popular, etc...).

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A [email protected]

                    The US is great at spending money in the military, but it absolutely sucks at actual war.

                    Look how they wasted trillions in Afghanistan to surrender to the Taliban.

                    the US military exists solely to funnel tax payer money to military shareholders.

                    rickyrigatoni@retrolemmy.comR This user is from outside of this forum
                    rickyrigatoni@retrolemmy.comR This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #99

                    Yeah but we won the war om werewolves.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    1
                    • B [email protected]

                      Why do you think that? How would losing half the military assets and technology would benefit NATO?

                      W This user is from outside of this forum
                      W This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #100

                      Half the military and technology assets that won't ever actually be used to help NATO under Trump.

                      He'll veto every action that goes against Russia... Which is what NATO was originally formed to do...

                      B L B 3 Replies Last reply
                      25
                      • B [email protected]

                        That was to funnel money, steal gold, and oil.

                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #101

                        in a way, the "mission accomplished" was true

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        1
                        • P [email protected]

                          He's an officer and over 20 years now. This discussion took place shortly after he gave me a tour of the bridge of the carrier he was assigned to at the time. The terminals were running Windows XP. This was 7-8 years ago tops.

                          G This user is from outside of this forum
                          G This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #102

                          ah, so you're full of shit and know nothing.

                          P 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • F [email protected]
                            This post did not contain any content.
                            K This user is from outside of this forum
                            K This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #103

                            He's just stirring shit to get his name out there isn't he?

                            W 1 Reply Last reply
                            18
                            • F [email protected]
                              This post did not contain any content.
                              almacca@aussie.zoneA This user is from outside of this forum
                              almacca@aussie.zoneA This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #104

                              Australia really needs to close Pine Gap as well.

                              F 1 Reply Last reply
                              5
                              • F [email protected]

                                China might have a 2 year window coming up where it's even possible to invade Taiwan. Their military has modernized a lot, but they probably aren't quite to the point of being able to pull it off. At the same time, they are looking at a demographic cliff from the long term implications of the One Child policy.

                                It's possible this window as already closed. That said, authoritarian regimes have started wars before that were terrible ideas.

                                spacecowboy@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                                spacecowboy@lemmy.caS This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #105

                                Yeah with how effective drones have been in Ukraine (especially in hitting the Russian Navy) I kinda doubt they'll have the capability. I feel like Taiwan is probably developing the capability to mass produce drones right now. They most definitely have the technology. Amphibious invasions are really hard to pull off, and China doesn't have a lot of naval experience. And nobody has ever done it with a thousand drone boats in the water.

                                And yup, authoritarians do stupid things with their military, we saw that already with Putin's invasion of Ukraine. So the question is, how stupid is Xi Jinping? I guess we'll have to wait and see.

                                D 1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • K [email protected]

                                  He's just stirring shit to get his name out there isn't he?

                                  W This user is from outside of this forum
                                  W This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #106

                                  Utahns generally don't like to draw attention to themselves as firebrands (e.g. Mitt Romney, Orrin Hatch), so methinks the Senator is planning to get into the 2028 presidential primary.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  15
                                  • A [email protected]

                                    The US is great at spending money in the military, but it absolutely sucks at actual war.

                                    Look how they wasted trillions in Afghanistan to surrender to the Taliban.

                                    the US military exists solely to funnel tax payer money to military shareholders.

                                    L This user is from outside of this forum
                                    L This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #107

                                    Actually, if you're curious, look up how many wars the US has actually outright won on their own without being part of a coalition of allies.

                                    The answer is shockingly few.

                                    Even their great revolution needed help from an, at the time, true superpower i.e. the French.

                                    A 1 Reply Last reply
                                    3
                                    • L [email protected]

                                      Actually, if you're curious, look up how many wars the US has actually outright won on their own without being part of a coalition of allies.

                                      The answer is shockingly few.

                                      Even their great revolution needed help from an, at the time, true superpower i.e. the French.

                                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                                      A This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #108

                                      checked a wiki page about that.

                                      it's frankly embarrassing how much the US military actually sucks.

                                      likely human history most expensive military, and a complete waste of resources

                                      G 1 Reply Last reply
                                      3
                                      • witchfire@lemmy.worldW [email protected]

                                        Honestly, NATO might be better off without them

                                        D This user is from outside of this forum
                                        D This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #109

                                        Agreed. Drumpf is Pootins "man"*on the inside. Look to him to delay and prevaricate any NATO decision, and generally try to sabotage them

                                        • Drumph is NOT a man. He's a cowardly little orange shit weasel.
                                        L 1 Reply Last reply
                                        8
                                        • R [email protected]

                                          I keep getting this sinking feeling that this is all leading up to a precise and coordinated attack of evil.

                                          Russia bombards the EU, the US attacks Greenland and Canada, while Israel finally bulldozes Gaza and Iran. China takes Taiwan and the south sea.

                                          All at the same time so NATO is overwhelmed and can’t decisively defend it all without risking spreading too thin. No matter what happens, one of the bad guys gains ground.

                                          I honestly have no idea if this is even possible, it’s based on a dream I had a few weeks ago.

                                          Disturbing thought though.

                                          A This user is from outside of this forum
                                          A This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #110

                                          Wait, "attack of evil"? The US is literally funding and arming the genocide in Gaza, the US IS the greatest evil. You may argue for Russia being a close second (discounting Israel), but how is the US not absolutely the worst by any metric? How many millions did it murder in Vietnam, Iraq, Korea, and how many millions more were murdered under its approval in Southeast Asia(Suharto) or Latin America (Pinochet)?

                                          R 1 Reply Last reply
                                          3
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups