Out of 10. Be specific!
-
wrote last edited by [email protected]This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
Knork/10
Not specific but technically follows the set rating system
-
This post did not contain any content.
I can not rate this based on this photo. It doesn't even show the complete fork. And how much does it weigh? Where's the banana for scale?
-
This post did not contain any content.
3.145183813819291837
Specific enough?
-
I can not rate this based on this photo. It doesn't even show the complete fork. And how much does it weigh? Where's the banana for scale?
-
3.145183813819291837
Specific enough?
Yes, that's technically allowed.
-
This post did not contain any content.
4/10, not for the unique tines but for the bulbous and tapered handle. Not as comfortable to hold and use as your standard fork.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote last edited by [email protected]
Why TF is Lemmy's nerodiversity waypoints forks and bricks?
I mean, that's half of mine. How did we get here?
Edit: 2/10. I hate it, but it has heft.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Crab Fork
8/10 dependent on reasonably sized crab to accommodate.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Insulting/purely decorative out of 10.
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote last edited by [email protected]
Reminds me of an early Bart Simpson
-
It looks like a Botero painting
-
This post did not contain any content.
3/10
Probably balanced OK and has a certain comfy weight in your hand.
But the shape is , all by very distinct, no good at differentiating between handle and fork head.
Function wise is the ability to poke food with the fork in question OK but could be improved.
But the ability to scoop things up is lost with this fork, the head is just to small and to thick.
And i personally hate the different dept oft cut in the forkhead. -
This post did not contain any content.
backscratcher/10
-
This post did not contain any content.
More practical than many Star Trek forks
-
Crab Fork
8/10 dependent on reasonably sized crab to accommodate.
Also good for oysters!
-
This post did not contain any content.
Zero thousand.
-
3.145183813819291837
Specific enough?
I guess but I'd prefer a rational answer.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I immediately downvoted this fork.. then scrolled back because I hate the fork, not the post. -238/10
