Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Not The Onion
  3. Bike lanes on Richmond-San Rafael Bridge are contributing to pollution, drivers say

Bike lanes on Richmond-San Rafael Bridge are contributing to pollution, drivers say

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Not The Onion
nottheonion
34 Posts 22 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • S [email protected]

    Imagine moving your body to do something. Not in my america

    S This user is from outside of this forum
    S This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #25

    Our founding fathers fought for my right to sit on the couch all day

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • dasus@lemmy.worldD [email protected]

      I'm genuinely too fatigued to figure out the logic behind this brainfart.

      Can someone eli5 pls

      S This user is from outside of this forum
      S This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #26

      Entitled people will grasp at any straw to blame everyone but themselves. While very blue, the Bay Area is still very car centric and people lose their minds over the slightest inconvenience against driving. I suspect their rationale here is that taking a lane away for driving and giving it to bikers means more traffic on the bridge and more pollution. Let’s not forget that all the people in Marin county routinely block initiatives to expand large scale public transit (ie our subway system BART) from SF and Contra Costa counties. They just want to drive their car and keep the “undesirables” out of their neighborhood.

      dasus@lemmy.worldD 1 Reply Last reply
      3
      • S [email protected]

        Entitled people will grasp at any straw to blame everyone but themselves. While very blue, the Bay Area is still very car centric and people lose their minds over the slightest inconvenience against driving. I suspect their rationale here is that taking a lane away for driving and giving it to bikers means more traffic on the bridge and more pollution. Let’s not forget that all the people in Marin county routinely block initiatives to expand large scale public transit (ie our subway system BART) from SF and Contra Costa counties. They just want to drive their car and keep the “undesirables” out of their neighborhood.

        dasus@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
        dasus@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #27

        Makes sense, thanks.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • huppakee@feddit.nlH [email protected]

          cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/32627207

          B This user is from outside of this forum
          B This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #28

          What’s wild to me is that you can fully support bike lanes, but the moment you suggest we educate cyclist on how they work and cyclists flip out.
          Like the mere mention of education sends them into convulsions.

          My town put up bike lanes everywhere, and I constantly have to dodge bikes on the sidewalk when I’m walking my toddler. And the bike lane next to the sidewalk sits empty right next to us. Most of the bike lanes are not on the road and if they are it’s never on a main or busy road.
          I’ve heard complains that bike lanes can be scary for the cyclists, well you zipping by me and my kid is scary for the pedestrian.

          So I think educating cyclists on how bike lanes work and enforcing them is crucial, otherwise what’s the point of them? The sad part is when I say “we should build bike lanes and make sure the people using them are educated on how they work and how the road laws and pedestrian yielding works” and everyone loses their mind.

          S L 2 Replies Last reply
          1
          • B [email protected]

            What’s wild to me is that you can fully support bike lanes, but the moment you suggest we educate cyclist on how they work and cyclists flip out.
            Like the mere mention of education sends them into convulsions.

            My town put up bike lanes everywhere, and I constantly have to dodge bikes on the sidewalk when I’m walking my toddler. And the bike lane next to the sidewalk sits empty right next to us. Most of the bike lanes are not on the road and if they are it’s never on a main or busy road.
            I’ve heard complains that bike lanes can be scary for the cyclists, well you zipping by me and my kid is scary for the pedestrian.

            So I think educating cyclists on how bike lanes work and enforcing them is crucial, otherwise what’s the point of them? The sad part is when I say “we should build bike lanes and make sure the people using them are educated on how they work and how the road laws and pedestrian yielding works” and everyone loses their mind.

            S This user is from outside of this forum
            S This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by [email protected]
            #29

            What do you mean, "educate cyclists on how bike lanes work"? They are there and you ride on them.

            B 1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • S [email protected]

              What do you mean, "educate cyclists on how bike lanes work"? They are there and you ride on them.

              B This user is from outside of this forum
              B This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #30

              There’s the problem, that’s all you think it is? Is that why cyclists are unable to signal and yield and have any sort of common courtesy. Why is education a dirty word to cyclists?

              huppakee@feddit.nlH 1 Reply Last reply
              2
              • B [email protected]

                There’s the problem, that’s all you think it is? Is that why cyclists are unable to signal and yield and have any sort of common courtesy. Why is education a dirty word to cyclists?

                huppakee@feddit.nlH This user is from outside of this forum
                huppakee@feddit.nlH This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #31

                I'm dutch and grew up in the Netherlands, they're so ubiquitous here you learn at a young age and so many people are cycling it is easy to learn from looking at what others do and still we have kids do an exam in the last year before high school, they have to learn the rules and cycle a certain route while people in plain clothes check if you know them.

                On the other hand, that is necessary because kids would otherwise learn the rules way later when trying to get their drivers license. I can imagine someone who knows the rules for cars would feel belittled by having to be educated on something 'inferior' after they already got their drivers license.

                But I wonder, do people not follow the rules because they don't know them (= they need to be educated) or because they don't like them (= the rules need to be enforced)?

                B 1 Reply Last reply
                3
                • huppakee@feddit.nlH [email protected]

                  cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/32627207

                  dantheclamman@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                  dantheclamman@lemmy.worldD This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #32

                  Just one more lane bro

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  2
                  • huppakee@feddit.nlH [email protected]

                    I'm dutch and grew up in the Netherlands, they're so ubiquitous here you learn at a young age and so many people are cycling it is easy to learn from looking at what others do and still we have kids do an exam in the last year before high school, they have to learn the rules and cycle a certain route while people in plain clothes check if you know them.

                    On the other hand, that is necessary because kids would otherwise learn the rules way later when trying to get their drivers license. I can imagine someone who knows the rules for cars would feel belittled by having to be educated on something 'inferior' after they already got their drivers license.

                    But I wonder, do people not follow the rules because they don't know them (= they need to be educated) or because they don't like them (= the rules need to be enforced)?

                    B This user is from outside of this forum
                    B This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #33

                    That's a big part of if, it’s not so much a cyclist issue as it’s a “North Americans are inconsiderate assholes” issue, no matter what mode of transport. All the motorists are assholes here, so are the cyclists and the transit riders, assholes all.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • B [email protected]

                      What’s wild to me is that you can fully support bike lanes, but the moment you suggest we educate cyclist on how they work and cyclists flip out.
                      Like the mere mention of education sends them into convulsions.

                      My town put up bike lanes everywhere, and I constantly have to dodge bikes on the sidewalk when I’m walking my toddler. And the bike lane next to the sidewalk sits empty right next to us. Most of the bike lanes are not on the road and if they are it’s never on a main or busy road.
                      I’ve heard complains that bike lanes can be scary for the cyclists, well you zipping by me and my kid is scary for the pedestrian.

                      So I think educating cyclists on how bike lanes work and enforcing them is crucial, otherwise what’s the point of them? The sad part is when I say “we should build bike lanes and make sure the people using them are educated on how they work and how the road laws and pedestrian yielding works” and everyone loses their mind.

                      L This user is from outside of this forum
                      L This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #34

                      Its not about education its about proper planning to make them simple. When the lane lasts for half a street then randomly ends or has no plan that's why people stop using them.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups