Good group to post this?
-
This post did not contain any content.
Maybe go spam it on conservative Facebook groups or something. Everyone here already agrees with you. You are accomplishing nothing.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Maybe don't stop posting but focus on making one good post a day and trying to generate good discussion?
Quality over quantity I think is the message.
-
Maybe don't stop posting but focus on making one good post a day and trying to generate good discussion?
Quality over quantity I think is the message.
I make some posts and reply when applicable.
-
Doesn't seem like something that needs to be posted at all.
Trying to restrict comments against Trump is certainly problematic and should be identified.
-
Trying to restrict comments against Trump is certainly problematic and should be identified.
But there was no restricting. You were politely asked to stop spamming.
-
It's not.
Can you explain in what way it is not spam?
-
But there was no restricting. You were politely asked to stop spamming.
Not spam. Restricting. Don't be daft.
-
Can you explain in what way it is not spam?
wrote last edited by [email protected]It's a relevant comment on posts that include Trump. I'm not AI, nor a bot. They're legit comments. Just because people don't like the frequency doesn't make it less important and it's not spam.
-
Trying to restrict comments against Trump is certainly problematic and should be identified.
It has nothing to do with Trump. You canât spam the same message over and over again, no matter what the subject is.
-
Not spam. Restricting. Don't be daft.
wrote last edited by [email protected]In that case keep spamming and you'll find out what a proper restriction looks like soon.
-
This post did not contain any content.
You canât cry âcensorshipâ for obviously violating the platform's rules. And also not even getting banned yet.
I mean, thatâs kinda what Trump supporters tend to do on commercial social media platforms.
-
It's a relevant comment on posts that include Trump. I'm not AI, nor a bot. They're legit comments. Just because people don't like the frequency doesn't make it less important and it's not spam.
wrote last edited by [email protected]But itâs the exact same comment on so many posts. It doesnât need to be a bot or AI doing the posting for it to be spam.
I understand you feel itâs relevant and important, but what you are doing is pretty much the definition of spamming.
-
It has nothing to do with Trump. You canât spam the same message over and over again, no matter what the subject is.
Release the Trump/Epstein files
Your comment mentioned Trump.
-
You canât cry âcensorshipâ for obviously violating the platform's rules. And also not even getting banned yet.
I mean, thatâs kinda what Trump supporters tend to do on commercial social media platforms.
Care to show me the exact rule?
-
But itâs the exact same comment on so many posts. It doesnât need to be a bot or AI doing the posting for it to be spam.
I understand you feel itâs relevant and important, but what you are doing is pretty much the definition of spamming.
Yet, it's not.
-
I think an important part of calling something spam is that it's unwanted. I don't mind the Epstein posts.
An equally important part of spam is the volume in a time span. Posting something positive, but massively repetitive, is also spam.
-
This post did not contain any content.
This behavior is as annoying as it is unhelpful. I agree that nobody should let the story fade from public interest but spamming random threads doesnât accomplish that. Itâs just obstructive and if anything itâs doing more harm than good. There is a thing called alarm fatigue. If you keep âshouting from your rooftopâ you are just going to push your neighbors into shutting their windows.
Also maybe consider talking to a therapist about it? Itâs none of my business but this level of investment seems unhealthy.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I feel you, you are not alone.
-
Yet, it's not.
do you know what spamming means?
-
Yet, it's not.
I mean, you can say that, but without a clear line of argument explaining why thatâs the case, I remain unconvinced.
