Good group to post this?
-
Fits the definition as far as I can see.
Nah. Definitely not by those standards.
-
I dunno what you mean. You can keep doing what you’re doing without literally copy paste spamming the same message, if that is what you want. You can copy paste spam somewhere else and stay on Lemmy.
Helping populate the Fediverse, at the expense of corporate social media helping Trump, is a hugely positive thing.
What’s the point of throwing that away?
So, you want me to work harder to put out an important message?
Get lost with that crap.
-
So, you want me to work harder to put out an important message?
Get lost with that crap.
No, I want you to do it somewhere else, on a platform that will actually accept it.
You are putting words into everyone’s mouths and not listening.
-
Release Luigi!
(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
hell yeaaaa
-
No, I want you to do it somewhere else, on a platform that will actually accept it.
You are putting words into everyone’s mouths and not listening.
I hear a bunch of whiners.
-
Meaningless messages posted on irrelevant subject matter.
This is not Spam.
Release the Trump/Epstein files
wrote last edited by [email protected]spam
/spăm/noun
- Unsolicited e-mail, often of a commercial nature, sent indiscriminately to multiple mailing lists, individuals, or newsgroups; junk e-mail.
- A single piece of such e-mail.
- A collection of unsolicited bulk electronic messages.
-
spam
/spăm/noun
- Unsolicited e-mail, often of a commercial nature, sent indiscriminately to multiple mailing lists, individuals, or newsgroups; junk e-mail.
- A single piece of such e-mail.
- A collection of unsolicited bulk electronic messages.
They're not unsolicited. They are a direct response to the subject matter of the posts that I reply.
-
This post did not contain any content.
good sentiment, but spam is spam. no matter what you are saying if you have the most comments on an entire instance from saying it its spam.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Release the Trump/Epstein files
-
on an entire instance
on all of Lemmy
-
I mean, you can say that, but without a clear line of argument explaining why that’s the case, I remain unconvinced.
wrote last edited by [email protected]I'm not against banning this manchild from petulantly spamming and gleefully "debating" with infantile retorts —though none of us actually believe he'll not just create a new account to start again.
edit: I'm blocking his dumbass from my feed, at the very least. Please, mods, take it further. Your communities rely on wiser heads to prevail.
-
They're not unsolicited. They are a direct response to the subject matter of the posts that I reply.
Unless the user above you literally has the Epstein files in their possession and is seeking opinions about whether to release it, how exactly is telling someone to release the files in any way a “direct response to the subject matter?@
