Yayyy, echo chambers!
-
The visibility issue is a direct response to your suggestion to making it private.
I read the trans men issue as a red herring to center men's voices. I'm not sure about that so I let it fall by the way side.
Your final paragraph just said this is a bad way to handle it. There's no response here because it's a valid concluding paragraph if the previous points hold water. Obviously, I don't think they do.
Good lord. This is exactly the type of shit I’m making a point about….
Me bringing up a VALID view point of a woman who is in the process of transitioning to a man, is centering a man’s voice…?
That is certainly a take….
-
Good lord. This is exactly the type of shit I’m making a point about….
Me bringing up a VALID view point of a woman who is in the process of transitioning to a man, is centering a man’s voice…?
That is certainly a take….
wrote last edited by [email protected]Like I said, I ignored it because I didn't know. I thought it better to be silent than wrong.
So I addressed the only other point you made.
-
🧑Without subtext the only way to read this comment is they are celebrating echo chambers. They aren't. Subtext is hard.
like I said you added your own head cannoned subtext
-
like I said you added your own head cannoned subtext
And like I said
🧑 -
And like I said
🧑lol ok you're annoying AF. blocked
-
lol ok you're annoying AF. blocked
You're a gem.
-
no they just said "yay an echo chamber" where does it say something about men? maybe I'm blind
ok what do you think the "echo chamber" content refers to?
-
i don't get why people... well, men... get so bent up over this. I'm a man and yeah seeing a post you want to comment on but seeing a rule that excludes you is a bit annoying but like who cares.
is an askreddit/asklemmy post an echo chamber if it starts with "botanists of reddit/lemmy" and if the rules forced only botanists to reply? ridiculous.
my input is not needed anywhere, let alone everywhere... i can suck it up and let one community go and do its thing without the grace of my comments.
A core part of my values is not excluding people for attributes they were born with. If they're an asshole, they should be excluded regardless of gender or anything else. I'd feel the same way if it were any other born characteristic being excluded.
It's like when I see a cybertruck - I disapprove of the driver's choices, but they had every right to make them.
-
you head cannoned your own subtext doofus. all they said was "yay echo chambers"
You added subtext, all they said was...
Determining the meaning from things that aren't directly stated is LITERALLY what subtext is
-
Well, no. I think you're just not listening to what I'm saying, and I don't really have a better way to get it across to you right now.
Have a good rest of your day!
Have a good rest of your day!
I would like to inform you than ending a comment like this to dismiss further discussion as often as you do is not the most healthy or useful practice.
-
Have a good rest of your day!
I would like to inform you than ending a comment like this to dismiss further discussion as often as you do is not the most healthy or useful practice.
It’s called not having anything else to add to a conversation that is going nowhere. It’s not that deep.
-
It’s called not having anything else to add to a conversation that is going nowhere. It’s not that deep.
But you continue to reply, so you do have something to add
