Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Lemmy Shitpost
  3. Yayyy, echo chambers!

Yayyy, echo chambers!

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Lemmy Shitpost
37 Posts 11 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L [email protected]

    Good lord. This is exactly the type of shit I’m making a point about….

    Me bringing up a VALID view point of a woman who is in the process of transitioning to a man, is centering a man’s voice…?

    That is certainly a take….

    T This user is from outside of this forum
    T This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by [email protected]
    #27

    Like I said, I ignored it because I didn't know. I thought it better to be silent than wrong.

    So I addressed the only other point you made.

    1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • T [email protected]

      🌎👨🏾‍🚀🔫🧑🏾‍🚀

      Without subtext the only way to read this comment is they are celebrating echo chambers. They aren't. Subtext is hard.

      D This user is from outside of this forum
      D This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #28

      like I said you added your own head cannoned subtext

      T 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D [email protected]

        like I said you added your own head cannoned subtext

        T This user is from outside of this forum
        T This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #29

        And like I said

        🌎👨🏾‍🚀🔫🧑🏾‍🚀

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • T [email protected]

          And like I said

          🌎👨🏾‍🚀🔫🧑🏾‍🚀

          D This user is from outside of this forum
          D This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #30

          lol ok you're annoying AF. blocked

          T 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D [email protected]

            lol ok you're annoying AF. blocked

            T This user is from outside of this forum
            T This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #31

            You're a gem.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D [email protected]

              no they just said "yay an echo chamber" where does it say something about men? maybe I'm blind

              P This user is from outside of this forum
              P This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #32

              ok what do you think the "echo chamber" content refers to?

              1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • P [email protected]

                i don't get why people... well, men... get so bent up over this. I'm a man and yeah seeing a post you want to comment on but seeing a rule that excludes you is a bit annoying but like who cares.

                is an askreddit/asklemmy post an echo chamber if it starts with "botanists of reddit/lemmy" and if the rules forced only botanists to reply? ridiculous.

                my input is not needed anywhere, let alone everywhere... i can suck it up and let one community go and do its thing without the grace of my comments.

                samus12345@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
                samus12345@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #33

                A core part of my values is not excluding people for attributes they were born with. If they're an asshole, they should be excluded regardless of gender or anything else. I'd feel the same way if it were any other born characteristic being excluded.

                It's like when I see a cybertruck - I disapprove of the driver's choices, but they had every right to make them.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D [email protected]

                  you head cannoned your own subtext doofus. all they said was "yay echo chambers"

                  F This user is from outside of this forum
                  F This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #34

                  You added subtext, all they said was...

                  Determining the meaning from things that aren't directly stated is LITERALLY what subtext is

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L [email protected]

                    Well, no. I think you're just not listening to what I'm saying, and I don't really have a better way to get it across to you right now.

                    Have a good rest of your day!

                    F This user is from outside of this forum
                    F This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #35

                    Have a good rest of your day!

                    I would like to inform you than ending a comment like this to dismiss further discussion as often as you do is not the most healthy or useful practice.

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • F [email protected]

                      Have a good rest of your day!

                      I would like to inform you than ending a comment like this to dismiss further discussion as often as you do is not the most healthy or useful practice.

                      L This user is from outside of this forum
                      L This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #36

                      It’s called not having anything else to add to a conversation that is going nowhere. It’s not that deep.

                      F 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • L [email protected]

                        It’s called not having anything else to add to a conversation that is going nowhere. It’s not that deep.

                        F This user is from outside of this forum
                        F This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by
                        #37

                        But you continue to reply, so you do have something to add

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups