Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Lemmy Shitpost
  3. Now I finally get it

Now I finally get it

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Lemmy Shitpost
lemmyshitpost
56 Posts 36 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • T [email protected]

    800 years? He had other sons and daughters, with who? His mom? His brothers? I know Christians love incest but 2 brothers can't have kids AFAIK. So he had sex with his mom?

    V This user is from outside of this forum
    V This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by [email protected]
    #41

    There is nowhere information that God created Earth as first planet and first human there, there is information he created planet and things or at most a galaxy but there is no information nowhere that it was first planet or first galaxy. He just found empty spot in space. It's pretty possible to do it if you could manipulate matter how you want and have unlimited energy source. That's just terraforming to be honest.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J [email protected]

      Lot's offer to the mob was meant to be an allegorical lesson on obligations to guests. Basically a hyperbolic 'this is how far you have go to protect guests in your house.' In the modern age it would be a hotel clerk holding off a mob with a shotgun or something like that.

      I'm not sure if the cave incest had a lesson behind it, but the impetus was his daughters thought they were the last people on earth and were trying to restart the population themselves. I don't think they were meant to be seen as evil for it.

      C This user is from outside of this forum
      C This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by [email protected]
      #42

      Thanks for reminding me of one of so many reasons I abandoned the family from my childhood and all their toxic abusive apologists in our schools and churches.

      Incredible you're in here defending throwing your own children to mob rape.

      I will tell you from experience that in religious schools and churches they LOVE to obsess over the tiny line of Lots wife looking back and turning to salt, while pretending the other shit didn't happen or avoiding the topic, or giving it a simple "he was weak or scared" or making it some kind of non-literal thing when convenient (and then other times angrily demanding the Bible is literal).

      Allegory or not, Lot is a piece of shit, and it's unsurprising that a man who would offer his daughters to a mob for rape would also raise them to think sleeping with him is okay. Its reflective of his character; the way they think.

      Also, he knew what they did and let it happen. If he was THAT passed out drunk to not remember or know, he was not erect. He fucking knew and let it happen.

      Let's pretend this is merely a story to teach a lesson. Wow. That's the best they got? This is the kind of guy that is worth saving from the town before destruction? This is what these religions held up at the time as the primo example of someone to save and keep alive? They have no better way to teach lessons about fearing God, much less morality.

      Fucking pathetic for anyone to even attempt the apologetics on this.

      J machinist@lemmy.worldM 2 Replies Last reply
      1
      • C [email protected]

        Thanks for reminding me of one of so many reasons I abandoned the family from my childhood and all their toxic abusive apologists in our schools and churches.

        Incredible you're in here defending throwing your own children to mob rape.

        I will tell you from experience that in religious schools and churches they LOVE to obsess over the tiny line of Lots wife looking back and turning to salt, while pretending the other shit didn't happen or avoiding the topic, or giving it a simple "he was weak or scared" or making it some kind of non-literal thing when convenient (and then other times angrily demanding the Bible is literal).

        Allegory or not, Lot is a piece of shit, and it's unsurprising that a man who would offer his daughters to a mob for rape would also raise them to think sleeping with him is okay. Its reflective of his character; the way they think.

        Also, he knew what they did and let it happen. If he was THAT passed out drunk to not remember or know, he was not erect. He fucking knew and let it happen.

        Let's pretend this is merely a story to teach a lesson. Wow. That's the best they got? This is the kind of guy that is worth saving from the town before destruction? This is what these religions held up at the time as the primo example of someone to save and keep alive? They have no better way to teach lessons about fearing God, much less morality.

        Fucking pathetic for anyone to even attempt the apologetics on this.

        J This user is from outside of this forum
        J This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #43

        In not sure how you see that as a defense. I think you might be projecting your own issues on others.

        C 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C [email protected]

          Thanks for reminding me of one of so many reasons I abandoned the family from my childhood and all their toxic abusive apologists in our schools and churches.

          Incredible you're in here defending throwing your own children to mob rape.

          I will tell you from experience that in religious schools and churches they LOVE to obsess over the tiny line of Lots wife looking back and turning to salt, while pretending the other shit didn't happen or avoiding the topic, or giving it a simple "he was weak or scared" or making it some kind of non-literal thing when convenient (and then other times angrily demanding the Bible is literal).

          Allegory or not, Lot is a piece of shit, and it's unsurprising that a man who would offer his daughters to a mob for rape would also raise them to think sleeping with him is okay. Its reflective of his character; the way they think.

          Also, he knew what they did and let it happen. If he was THAT passed out drunk to not remember or know, he was not erect. He fucking knew and let it happen.

          Let's pretend this is merely a story to teach a lesson. Wow. That's the best they got? This is the kind of guy that is worth saving from the town before destruction? This is what these religions held up at the time as the primo example of someone to save and keep alive? They have no better way to teach lessons about fearing God, much less morality.

          Fucking pathetic for anyone to even attempt the apologetics on this.

          machinist@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
          machinist@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #44

          You're nine kinds of warped around the axle about this and being pretty nasty to someone who seems to be chill.

          Also, as an agnostic atheist raised in some ugly fundamentalism: you're applying modern views that are out of context to the period. Women and children were basically property. A similar modern view would be towards livestock.

          C 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M [email protected]
            This post did not contain any content.
            S This user is from outside of this forum
            S This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #45

            It's about time someone made some sense from this hateful and damaging book. Next time I decide to eat some gummies, I'll be sure to do so with an open-minded male friend. Let's rock and roll.

            1 Reply Last reply
            1
            • M [email protected]
              This post did not contain any content.
              D This user is from outside of this forum
              D This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #46

              The bible have some kinky tales that not even myself my friend have ever seen in a FamilytTherapy video.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B [email protected]

                Problem is Genesis was written before the religion it was written for decided it was a monotheist religion that believed it was the only truth. So Yaweh created Adam and Eve, who had a couple of sons, one killed the other, but then that other went out and joined up with the other people made from other gods or titans or whatever, somehow convinced some of them to join his clan for a god that loved them, but then hated them because they sought knowledge (via eating fruit lol they really didn't want their followers to be able to figure out shit to the point of even misdirecting them for how one obtains knowledge).

                Where it falls apart even considering the original context is Noah's flood, because that did apparently wipe everyone out except one mating pair per species, so how did Noah's descendents repopulate the world without other populations to hook up with?

                B This user is from outside of this forum
                B This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #47

                When I was about six, and discovered science and space, I got really into it. Pretty soon, the religious stuff I was hearing in Sunday School wasn't jiving with the real science I was learning.

                Where was Heaven? Where was Hell? Have scientists seen it? Do they know where it is? How can there be such places? If things like ghosts aren't real, then how are these creatures real? I had another 100 unanswerable questions, easy, but they were unanswerable because there are no answers, because the entire thing is bullshit.

                I knew that the minute my frustrated father finally just blustered "Nobody knows the answers to your questions. You just have to have FAITH!" And even at 6 or 7, that was it for me. I heard that for exactly what it was - it's all nonsense, we all know it's nonsense, but we're going to pretend it's real, and call it FAITH.

                Well, not me. I remember becoming an atheist at that very moment in time, and I've never heard anything to change my mind.

                B 1 Reply Last reply
                1
                • B [email protected]

                  When I was about six, and discovered science and space, I got really into it. Pretty soon, the religious stuff I was hearing in Sunday School wasn't jiving with the real science I was learning.

                  Where was Heaven? Where was Hell? Have scientists seen it? Do they know where it is? How can there be such places? If things like ghosts aren't real, then how are these creatures real? I had another 100 unanswerable questions, easy, but they were unanswerable because there are no answers, because the entire thing is bullshit.

                  I knew that the minute my frustrated father finally just blustered "Nobody knows the answers to your questions. You just have to have FAITH!" And even at 6 or 7, that was it for me. I heard that for exactly what it was - it's all nonsense, we all know it's nonsense, but we're going to pretend it's real, and call it FAITH.

                  Well, not me. I remember becoming an atheist at that very moment in time, and I've never heard anything to change my mind.

                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                  B This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #48

                  Personally, I did change my mind from atheism to agnosticism just because a lack of evidence isn't a proof and you can't prove a negative. Established religions reek of control and manipulation, but I had to also conclude that it was naive to have faith that there isn't anything more to whatever this reality is beyond what we can tell with science.

                  At the very least, there's future scientific discoveries we can only guess at, but there's also unknowable things, at least given the limitations we currently have as beings of this reality.

                  I 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B [email protected]

                    Personally, I did change my mind from atheism to agnosticism just because a lack of evidence isn't a proof and you can't prove a negative. Established religions reek of control and manipulation, but I had to also conclude that it was naive to have faith that there isn't anything more to whatever this reality is beyond what we can tell with science.

                    At the very least, there's future scientific discoveries we can only guess at, but there's also unknowable things, at least given the limitations we currently have as beings of this reality.

                    I This user is from outside of this forum
                    I This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #49

                    The proposed existence of unknowable things, however, isn't an argument for the religious explanation. Claiming something is unknowable but then also supposing it might be this specific thing is contradictory. Draw the line at saying "we can't know" not "you can't prove it doesn't exist".

                    Also, that slippery scope where the same stance of "you can't prove it doesn't exist" applying to things like unicorns, space teapots, superheroes, midichlorians...

                    B 1 Reply Last reply
                    2
                    • I [email protected]

                      The proposed existence of unknowable things, however, isn't an argument for the religious explanation. Claiming something is unknowable but then also supposing it might be this specific thing is contradictory. Draw the line at saying "we can't know" not "you can't prove it doesn't exist".

                      Also, that slippery scope where the same stance of "you can't prove it doesn't exist" applying to things like unicorns, space teapots, superheroes, midichlorians...

                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #50

                      Yes, the only conclusion you can logically draw is that it's impossible to know if they do or don't exist. Instead of seeing the world as a set of ideas that either resolve to true or false, I see it as a set of ideas that resolve to true, false, or unknown.

                      Which also "resolves" a bunch of language paradoxes that depend on the only options being "true" or "false". Like "this statement is false". It also works on the halting problem, though still doesn't make it trivial to solve (it just defeats the paradox proof if you allow a third option for paradoxes instead of insisting it only returns true or false).

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • M [email protected]
                        This post did not contain any content.
                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                        A This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by
                        #51

                        So wasn't the old testament superceded by the New testament of Jesus Christ? That's literally the whole thing of Christianity. The old testament is basically Judaism isn't it?

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • T [email protected]

                          All humans decent from Adam and Eve, yet they only had 3 sons.

                          A This user is from outside of this forum
                          A This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote last edited by
                          #52

                          Yeah, they boned neanderthals. Duh

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          1
                          • M [email protected]
                            This post did not contain any content.
                            K This user is from outside of this forum
                            K This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote last edited by
                            #53

                            Imagine believing your morally justified telling some 13 year old queer kid they're an abomination because of some fucking verse in your copy of the Goatherd's Guide to the Galaxy.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            2
                            • J [email protected]

                              In not sure how you see that as a defense. I think you might be projecting your own issues on others.

                              C This user is from outside of this forum
                              C This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote last edited by [email protected]
                              #54

                              Well no fucking shit. My own issues are called "the fucking Christian abusers who used this shit against me and anyone else to stave off any responsibility for anything."

                              If it hadn't affected me negatively I'd probably not give a shit what some people's scripts say.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • machinist@lemmy.worldM [email protected]

                                You're nine kinds of warped around the axle about this and being pretty nasty to someone who seems to be chill.

                                Also, as an agnostic atheist raised in some ugly fundamentalism: you're applying modern views that are out of context to the period. Women and children were basically property. A similar modern view would be towards livestock.

                                C This user is from outside of this forum
                                C This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote last edited by
                                #55

                                That doesn't make it okay. This God was just okay with that? Hahaha. Fuck that.

                                I was also raised in that shit. Of course I'm fucking warped by it.

                                This shit is fucked up and ANY defense of these scriptures is automatic red flag for hateful bigotry.

                                machinist@lemmy.worldM 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • C [email protected]

                                  That doesn't make it okay. This God was just okay with that? Hahaha. Fuck that.

                                  I was also raised in that shit. Of course I'm fucking warped by it.

                                  This shit is fucked up and ANY defense of these scriptures is automatic red flag for hateful bigotry.

                                  machinist@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  machinist@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote last edited by
                                  #56

                                  You're trying to chew on the wrong people. No one here is defending anything. Context is being provided.

                                  Organized religion is mostly a poison, especially the fundamentalist version. Also, I get the rage. That shit ate my family.

                                  That being said, I think it's important to be as accurate as possible in our criticism. Lot's daughters were offered for gang rape as his visitors were male aspect angels. Warped perspective given modern views. It's about the duty to visitors and the evil of Sodom. I don't know the historicity of Sodom and Gomorrah, but the story is almost certainly mostly fictional.

                                  What's really fucked up is trying to apply Bronze Age morality to the current age and cramming it down children's throats.

                                  You're so angry about this shit, but, maybe you should make sure you're directing that anger at appropriate targets.

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  Reply
                                  • Reply as topic
                                  Log in to reply
                                  • Oldest to Newest
                                  • Newest to Oldest
                                  • Most Votes


                                  • Login

                                  • Login or register to search.
                                  • First post
                                    Last post
                                  0
                                  • Categories
                                  • Recent
                                  • Tags
                                  • Popular
                                  • World
                                  • Users
                                  • Groups