the beautiful code
-
I asked ChatGPT with help about bare metal 32-bit ARM (For the Pi Zero W) C/ASM, emulated in QEMU for testing, and after the third iteration of "use printf for output" -> "there's no printf with bare metal as target" -> "use solution X" -> "doesn't work" -> "ude printf for output" ... I had enough.
Yeah you can tell it just ratholes on trying to force one concept to work rather than realizing it's not the correct concept to begin with
-
This post did not contain any content.
To be fair, if I wrote 3000 new lines of code in one shot, it probably wouldn’t run either.
LLMs are good for simple bits of logic under around 200 lines of code, or things that are strictly boilerplate. People who are trying to force it to do things beyond that are just being silly.
-
No, still "perfect" for llms. There's nuance, seeing patterns being used, it should be able to handle it perfectly. Enough people on stack overflow asked enough questions, if AI is like Google and Microsoft claim it is, it should have handled it
I searched this issue and didn't find anything very helpful. The new config format can be done many slightly different ways and there are a lot of variables in how your plugins and presets can be. It made perfect sense to me that the LLM couldn't do this upgrade for op. Since one tiny mistake and it won't work at all and usually gives a weird error.
-
This is a philosophical discussion and I doubt you are educated or experienced enough to contribute anything worthwhile to it.
Insulting, but also correct. What "knowing" something even means has a long philosophical history.
-
Semantics
Not even remotely.
-
Welp. Its actually very in line with the late stage capitalist system. All polish, no innovation.
Awwwww snap look at this limp dick future we got going on here.
-
Code that does not work is just text.
Conversely, code that works is also text
-
To be fair, if I wrote 3000 new lines of code in one shot, it probably wouldn’t run either.
LLMs are good for simple bits of logic under around 200 lines of code, or things that are strictly boilerplate. People who are trying to force it to do things beyond that are just being silly.
You managed to get an ai to do 200 lines of code and it actually compiled?
-
Conversely, code that works is also text
But working code can be made into numbers.
-
Try to get one of these LLMs to update a package.json.
ones that can run cli tools do great, they just use npm
-
I’ve never thought of it that way. I’m going to add copy writer to my resume.
Maybe fiction writer as well
-
You managed to get an ai to do 200 lines of code and it actually compiled?
4o has been able to do this for months.
-
But working code can be made into numbers.
But text is also numbers
-
I asked ChatGPT with help about bare metal 32-bit ARM (For the Pi Zero W) C/ASM, emulated in QEMU for testing, and after the third iteration of "use printf for output" -> "there's no printf with bare metal as target" -> "use solution X" -> "doesn't work" -> "ude printf for output" ... I had enough.
That's what tends to happen
-
This post did not contain any content.
Did it try to blackmail him if he didn't use the new code?
-
My uncle. Very smart very neuronal. He knows the entire Internet, can you imagine? the entire internet. Like the mails of Crooked Hillary Clinton, that crook. You know what stands in that Mails? my uncle knows. He makes the best code. The most beautiful code. No one has ever seen code like it, but for him, he's a genius, like i am, i have inherited all his genius genes. It is very easy. He makes the best code. Sometimes he calls me and asks me: you are even smarter than i am. Can you look at my code?
Thanks, I hate it.
-
I can tell you're a member of the next generation.
Gonna ignore you now.
A 3 day old account being a dick on Lemmy?
I'm shocked.
-
You managed to get an ai to do 200 lines of code and it actually compiled?
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Uh yeah, like all the time. Anyone who says otherwise really hasn’t tried recently. I know it’s a meme that AI can’t code (and still in many cases that’s true, eg. I don’t have the AI do anything with OpenCV or complex math) but it’s very routine these days for common use cases like web development.
-
Not even remotely.
You could claim that it knows the pattern of how references are formatted, depending on what you mean by the word know. Therefore, 100% uninteresting discussion of semantics.
-
Insulting, but also correct. What "knowing" something even means has a long philosophical history.
Trying to treat the discussion as a philisophical one is giving more nuance to 'knowing' than it deserves. An LLM can spit out a sentence that looks like it knows something, but it is just pattern matching frequency of word associations which is mimicry, not knowledge.
