Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Technology
  3. New survey suggests the vast majority of iPhone and Samsung Galaxy users find AI useless – and I’m not surprised

New survey suggests the vast majority of iPhone and Samsung Galaxy users find AI useless – and I’m not surprised

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Technology
technology
224 Posts 148 Posters 4 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • 9 [email protected]

    I hate that i can no longer trust what comes out of my phone camera to be an accurate representation of reality. I turn off all the AI enhancement stuff but who knows what kind of fuckery is baked into the firmware.

    NO, i dont want fake AI depth of field. NO, i do not want fake AI "makeup" fixing my ugly face. NO, i do not want AI deleting tourists in the background of my picture of the eiffel tower.

    NO, i do not want AI curating my memories and reality. Sure, my vacation photos have shitty lighting and bad composition. But they are MY photos and MY memories of something i experienced personally. AI should not be "fixing" that for me

    owl@infosec.pubO This user is from outside of this forum
    owl@infosec.pubO This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #215

    Is there a black mirror episode for that? A technology, that automatically edits your memories to be inaccurate, but "better".

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • kspatlas@sopuli.xyzK [email protected]

      There are definitely non american social media platforms and groups and stuff, I'm guessing the same thing keeping you from knowing about them is keeping other americans from knowing about them

      sixtyforce@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
      sixtyforce@sh.itjust.worksS This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by
      #216

      Maybe but idk what you mean.

      I could however use a list if you felt like making one for some rando online.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • System shared this topic on
      • clonedhuman@lemmy.worldC [email protected]

        I think the fact someone would need to explain this to you makes it pointless to try and explain it to you. I can't tell whether you're honestly asking a question or just searching for a debate to attempt to justify your viewpoint.

        ? Offline
        ? Offline
        Guest
        wrote on last edited by
        #217

        You're implicating, there are trusted sources, I am saying, there are no trusted sources whatsoever, and you should equally doubt any source. So, who's the one not understanding some principle?

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • ? Guest

          I agree it is a tool, and they should be taught how to use it properly, but I disagree that is like a pen or a ruler. It's more like a GPS or Roomba. Yes, they are tools that can make your life easier, but it's better to learn how to read a map and operate a vacuum or a broom than to be taught to rely on the tool doing the hard work for you.

          ? Offline
          ? Offline
          Guest
          wrote on last edited by
          #218

          You are sincerely advocating for teaching how to read a physical map? When will you ever need that ever, without a Zombie apocalypse?

          It might be good to teach them this skill additionally, for the sake of brain development. But we should stay in reality and not replace real tools with obsolete ones in education, because children should be prepared for the real world and not for some world, that does not exist (anymore).

          Same reason, why I find it ridiculous, how much children are cushioned to the brim and are denied to see the real world for 17 years and ~355 days, in the USA system. As soon as they are 18, they start to see the real world and they are not at all prepared for this surprise.

          ? 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • ? Guest

            You are sincerely advocating for teaching how to read a physical map? When will you ever need that ever, without a Zombie apocalypse?

            It might be good to teach them this skill additionally, for the sake of brain development. But we should stay in reality and not replace real tools with obsolete ones in education, because children should be prepared for the real world and not for some world, that does not exist (anymore).

            Same reason, why I find it ridiculous, how much children are cushioned to the brim and are denied to see the real world for 17 years and ~355 days, in the USA system. As soon as they are 18, they start to see the real world and they are not at all prepared for this surprise.

            ? Offline
            ? Offline
            Guest
            wrote on last edited by
            #219

            You are sincerely advocating for teaching how to read a physical map? When will you ever need that ever, without a Zombie apocalypse?

            I strongly advocate it, it's a basic skill. Like simple math, reading and writing, being able to balance a budget, cooking, etc, being able to read a map is a necessary basic skill.

            Maps aren't obsolete. GPS literally works off of the existence maps. Trying to claim maps are obsolete is like saying that cooking food at home is obsolete because you can order delivery.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • 9 [email protected]

              I hate that i can no longer trust what comes out of my phone camera to be an accurate representation of reality. I turn off all the AI enhancement stuff but who knows what kind of fuckery is baked into the firmware.

              NO, i dont want fake AI depth of field. NO, i do not want fake AI "makeup" fixing my ugly face. NO, i do not want AI deleting tourists in the background of my picture of the eiffel tower.

              NO, i do not want AI curating my memories and reality. Sure, my vacation photos have shitty lighting and bad composition. But they are MY photos and MY memories of something i experienced personally. AI should not be "fixing" that for me

              arakhis_@feddit.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
              arakhis_@feddit.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #220

              classic techbro overhype

              Add new feature into everything without seperating and offering choice to opt out of it

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • nuko147@lemm.eeN [email protected]

                This is what happens when companies prioritize hype over privacy and try to monetize every innovation. Why pay €1,500 for a phone only to have basic AI features? AI should solve real problems, not be a cash grab.

                Imagine if AI actually worked for users:

                • Show me all settings to block data sharing and maximize privacy.
                • Explain how you optimized my battery last week and how much time it saved.
                • Automatically silence spam calls without selling my data to third parties.
                • Detect and block apps that secretly drain data or access my microphone.
                • Automatically organize my photos by topic without uploading them to the cloud.
                • Make everything i could do with TASKER with only just saying it in plain words.
                arakhis_@feddit.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                arakhis_@feddit.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #221

                How could you ensure AI to privately sort your pictures, if the requests to analyze your sensitive imagery need to be made on a server? (that based its knowledge of disrespecting others copyright anyway, lol)

                nuko147@lemm.eeN 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • arakhis_@feddit.orgA [email protected]

                  How could you ensure AI to privately sort your pictures, if the requests to analyze your sensitive imagery need to be made on a server? (that based its knowledge of disrespecting others copyright anyway, lol)

                  nuko147@lemm.eeN This user is from outside of this forum
                  nuko147@lemm.eeN This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #222

                  Why it must connect to a server to do it? Why can not offline? Deepseek showed us that it is possible. The companies want everyone to think that AI only works online. For example AI image enhancements in my mid range Samsung phone work offline.

                  arakhis_@feddit.orgA 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • nuko147@lemm.eeN [email protected]

                    Why it must connect to a server to do it? Why can not offline? Deepseek showed us that it is possible. The companies want everyone to think that AI only works online. For example AI image enhancements in my mid range Samsung phone work offline.

                    arakhis_@feddit.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                    arakhis_@feddit.orgA This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #223

                    oh my bad, sorry im not well versed.

                    Thats why I asked 😛

                    nuko147@lemm.eeN 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • arakhis_@feddit.orgA [email protected]

                      oh my bad, sorry im not well versed.

                      Thats why I asked 😛

                      nuko147@lemm.eeN This user is from outside of this forum
                      nuko147@lemm.eeN This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #224

                      A lot of people think as a must that AI = permanent server connection. I don't mind if it is a bit slower but part of my device.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • System shared this topic on
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups