Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Microblog Memes
  3. oddly specific

oddly specific

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Microblog Memes
microblogmemes
62 Posts 41 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • buboscandiacus@mander.xyzB [email protected]

    Oh you are the numbers guy ? Name every number

    K This user is from outside of this forum
    K This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote last edited by
    #21

    0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

    O V 2 Replies Last reply
    5
    • C [email protected]

      Oh yeah well if you're some sort of numbers guy, answer me this: I think you're name is super cool, and makes me wonder, is there a largest prime you can make listing digits of pi starting from the beginning. There's gotta be infinite right?

      addie@feddit.ukA This user is from outside of this forum
      addie@feddit.ukA This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote last edited by
      #22

      Well, three is prime and pi starts with a three, therefore, even if there's larger primes, there is one which is the largest. QED.

      C 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • addie@feddit.ukA [email protected]

        Well, three is prime and pi starts with a three, therefore, even if there's larger primes, there is one which is the largest. QED.

        C This user is from outside of this forum
        C This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote last edited by
        #23

        Unless there isn't one that's the largest because there are infinite primes.

        jackbydev@programming.devJ 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • N [email protected]
          This post did not contain any content.
          R This user is from outside of this forum
          R This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote last edited by
          #24

          A previous version of this article said it was "not clear why WhatsApp settled on the oddly specific number." A number of readers have since noted that 256 is one of the most important numbers in computing, since it refers to the number of variations that can be represented by eight switches that have two positions - eight bits, or a byte.

          Lol, weird way to say that 256 is a power of two, and computers operate in base two.

          jackbydev@programming.devJ O 2 Replies Last reply
          27
          • P [email protected]

            Numbers guy here, I can confirm 256 is an evenly specific number, and not an oddly specific number.

            Q This user is from outside of this forum
            Q This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote last edited by
            #25

            As the numbers guy. Do you remember the name of the site that can tell you the what a given number is often associated with?

            P jackbydev@programming.devJ 2 Replies Last reply
            1
            • N [email protected]
              This post did not contain any content.
              B This user is from outside of this forum
              B This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote last edited by
              #26

              I remember being puzzled by this and many other numbers that kept cropping up. 32, 64, 128, 256, 1024, 2048... Why do programmers and electronic engineers hate round numbers? The other set of numbers that was mysterious was timber and sheet materials. They cut them to 1220 x 2440mm and thicknesses of 18 and 25mm. Are programmers and the timber merchants part of some diabolical conspiracy?

              S jackbydev@programming.devJ 2 Replies Last reply
              10
              • B [email protected]

                I remember being puzzled by this and many other numbers that kept cropping up. 32, 64, 128, 256, 1024, 2048... Why do programmers and electronic engineers hate round numbers? The other set of numbers that was mysterious was timber and sheet materials. They cut them to 1220 x 2440mm and thicknesses of 18 and 25mm. Are programmers and the timber merchants part of some diabolical conspiracy?

                S This user is from outside of this forum
                S This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote last edited by
                #27

                They just do it to look cool in front of their developer friends.

                J 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Q [email protected]

                  As the numbers guy. Do you remember the name of the site that can tell you the what a given number is often associated with?

                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                  P This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote last edited by
                  #28

                  Wikipedia often has disambiguation pages for numbers that may be helpful in a search like this (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/71).

                  WolframAlpha is good for identifying numerical properties of numbers (https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=71).

                  OEIS has a searchable set of sequences (https://oeis.org/search?q=71&language=english&go=Search)

                  I fear that none of these is what you're looking for, though. My attempts to find something that sounds like what you want mostly turned up resources on numerology, and at least one article apparently about how the meaning of numbers is radically different between cultures.

                  Q 1 Reply Last reply
                  3
                  • N [email protected]
                    This post did not contain any content.
                    jackbydev@programming.devJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    jackbydev@programming.devJ This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote last edited by
                    #29

                    A lot of things arbitrarily limit what they can do to more "human friendly" numbers.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • B [email protected]

                      I remember being puzzled by this and many other numbers that kept cropping up. 32, 64, 128, 256, 1024, 2048... Why do programmers and electronic engineers hate round numbers? The other set of numbers that was mysterious was timber and sheet materials. They cut them to 1220 x 2440mm and thicknesses of 18 and 25mm. Are programmers and the timber merchants part of some diabolical conspiracy?

                      jackbydev@programming.devJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      jackbydev@programming.devJ This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote last edited by
                      #30

                      Powers of two are the roundest of numbers.

                      B C 2 Replies Last reply
                      16
                      • R [email protected]

                        A previous version of this article said it was "not clear why WhatsApp settled on the oddly specific number." A number of readers have since noted that 256 is one of the most important numbers in computing, since it refers to the number of variations that can be represented by eight switches that have two positions - eight bits, or a byte.

                        Lol, weird way to say that 256 is a power of two, and computers operate in base two.

                        jackbydev@programming.devJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jackbydev@programming.devJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote last edited by
                        #31

                        It's a pretty succinct explanation that links what it is to something most people have heard of (a byte).

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        12
                        • J [email protected]

                          Shout out to Castlevania II, where you can hold anywhere from 0 to 256 laurels. Yes, you read that right -- 256, not 255. I inspected RAM to double check. It's a 16-bit word on an 8-bit system with a maximum value of 0x100. They could have used 8 bits instead of 16. But no, they really did choose this arbitrary number.

                          jackbydev@programming.devJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jackbydev@programming.devJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote last edited by
                          #32

                          I hate this. I love this.

                          If I ever make a game I might put stuff like this in it.

                          O 1 Reply Last reply
                          7
                          • K [email protected]

                            0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9

                            O This user is from outside of this forum
                            O This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote last edited by
                            #33

                            So simple yet so effective as an answer

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • P [email protected]

                              Wikipedia often has disambiguation pages for numbers that may be helpful in a search like this (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/71).

                              WolframAlpha is good for identifying numerical properties of numbers (https://www.wolframalpha.com/input?i=71).

                              OEIS has a searchable set of sequences (https://oeis.org/search?q=71&language=english&go=Search)

                              I fear that none of these is what you're looking for, though. My attempts to find something that sounds like what you want mostly turned up resources on numerology, and at least one article apparently about how the meaning of numbers is radically different between cultures.

                              Q This user is from outside of this forum
                              Q This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote last edited by
                              #34

                              No that doesn't seem to be it. Thanks for trying anyway.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • Q [email protected]

                                As the numbers guy. Do you remember the name of the site that can tell you the what a given number is often associated with?

                                jackbydev@programming.devJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                jackbydev@programming.devJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote last edited by
                                #35

                                My brain is going to OEIS or angel numbers which are both like total opposites. Number theory or numerology, take your pick.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                1
                                • C [email protected]

                                  Unless there isn't one that's the largest because there are infinite primes.

                                  jackbydev@programming.devJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  jackbydev@programming.devJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote last edited by [email protected]
                                  #36

                                  You started at zero and went to infinity. If you start at infinity and go to zero then the first prime you got is the largest. QED.

                                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • D [email protected]

                                    No, you can't have a group of zero, so the counter doesn't need to waste a position counting zero.

                                    jackbydev@programming.devJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    jackbydev@programming.devJ This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote last edited by
                                    #37

                                    Tell that to the Castlevania 2 devs. https://lemmy.ml/comment/19720906

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • jackbydev@programming.devJ [email protected]

                                      Powers of two are the roundest of numbers.

                                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                                      B This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote last edited by
                                      #38

                                      Much later in my career I came to appreciate the beauty of this system and the link with hexadecimal. I had to debug a network transmitted CRC that was endian flipped and in that process learned that in the Galois Field of two, 1+1=0 which feels delightfully nonsensical to a luddite.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      1
                                      • R [email protected]

                                        A previous version of this article said it was "not clear why WhatsApp settled on the oddly specific number." A number of readers have since noted that 256 is one of the most important numbers in computing, since it refers to the number of variations that can be represented by eight switches that have two positions - eight bits, or a byte.

                                        Lol, weird way to say that 256 is a power of two, and computers operate in base two.

                                        O This user is from outside of this forum
                                        O This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote last edited by
                                        #39

                                        Their definition is a lot better.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        11
                                        • jackbydev@programming.devJ [email protected]

                                          You started at zero and went to infinity. If you start at infinity and go to zero then the first prime you got is the largest. QED.

                                          C This user is from outside of this forum
                                          C This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote last edited by
                                          #40

                                          I can no longer tell if these are bits. 🫠

                                          jackbydev@programming.devJ M 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups