Your browser does not seem to support JavaScript. As a result, your viewing experience will be diminished, and you have been placed in read-only mode.
Please download a browser that supports JavaScript, or enable it if it's disabled (i.e. NoScript).
This is actually a better ruling then it might sound. Basically the problem was that the house was on a hill, so the risk of flooding was too low to the court. However the court did agree that companies can be sued for climate damages.
