Which of your favorite sci-fi tech seems achievable in a reasonable timeframe, say 100 years?
-
This post did not contain any content.
external gestation...a womb with a view
severe genetic manipulation... designer babies
digit/limb/organ regeneration
-
This post did not contain any content.
FTL communication using quantum entangled particles.
-
FTL communication using quantum entangled particles.
Not FTL though. Slower than light, causality preserving version? Sure.
-
external gestation...a womb with a view
severe genetic manipulation... designer babies
digit/limb/organ regeneration
Seems entirely reasonable that a Gattaca future is achievable. Whether desirable is the other question. Somewhere CJ Cherryh is being worshipped as a prophet.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Cancer curing nanotechnology
-
This post did not contain any content.
I suspect we will see a human brain to digital interface. I don't think it will be "downloading minds" or anything, but I could see someone finding a way to plug a specialized camera or mic in to have a full functioning robotic replacement part.
I'm pretty sure they already have the beginning pieces to this, but its too specialized and expensive to do anything commercial with it yet.
-
Seems entirely reasonable that a Gattaca future is achievable. Whether desirable is the other question. Somewhere CJ Cherryh is being worshipped as a prophet.
Artificial wombs are something that's often presented as dystopian, but I would imagine would actually be a very good thing. Beyond the obvious help it would be to infertile couples that desired children, they would if commonly adopted eliminate the danger of birth and pregnancy complications, and discomfort associated with the process. Probably not everyone would want to use it, but I'd bet even having the option would mean a lot to a lot of people.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Artificial stem cells seem like the next thing to really revolutionize medicine.
Quantum computers for brute force hacks seems doable in 100.
Eye tracking pointer devices will likely be more convenient than mice within a dozen or two years. This will probably be widely available for people who are paralyzed first.
Diamond processors are always 10 years away, but I think we can do it in 100. This would revolutionize the amount of power we can put through a chip without worrying about cooling.
Quick charge capacitor replacements for standard rechargble batteries
Low yield fusion plants. I'd like to think of them as capable of high yield, but it's much harder than initially thought. Some ideas are quite promising for low yield.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I think we can make an oven with a tiny fire breathing dinosaur in it.
-
Portable communicators. It would be slick to have a USB c tricorder though.
Hold up. I'm pretty sure things that already exist don't count.
-
Portable communicators. It would be slick to have a USB c tricorder though.
...you mean phones?
-
Artificial wombs are something that's often presented as dystopian, but I would imagine would actually be a very good thing. Beyond the obvious help it would be to infertile couples that desired children, they would if commonly adopted eliminate the danger of birth and pregnancy complications, and discomfort associated with the process. Probably not everyone would want to use it, but I'd bet even having the option would mean a lot to a lot of people.
And then all of this gave birth to the terrorists known as the Naturalists
... -
This post did not contain any content.wrote on last edited by [email protected]
Direct brain interfaces for, like, VR. So instead of a screen strapped to your face, your visual cortex is just stimulated so you see the game using your own "hardware." A literal Matrix type environment for your mind.
This is either gonna be cool and fun, or scary and evil. But it will exist.
-
This post did not contain any content.
I would guess that we'll most-likely have AGI in 100 years. That's pretty futuristic and impactful.
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
FTL communication using quantum entangled particles.
Not possible; entanglement collapse can't be used to send information
-
This post did not contain any content.
Fully autonomous humanoid robots. Unfortunately with out-of-control AGI they will probably kill me.
It would have been cool to have a benign C3-PO or R2D2.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Computer circuits based on light instead of electricity.
-
Not possible; entanglement collapse can't be used to send information
The idea is this:
2 particles are quantum entangled. Whatever happens to one instantly happens to the other regardless of distance.
So you establish a state that means "0" and a state that means "1" and you can send binary.
At a minimum, you have quantum Morse code.
-
The idea is this:
2 particles are quantum entangled. Whatever happens to one instantly happens to the other regardless of distance.
So you establish a state that means "0" and a state that means "1" and you can send binary.
At a minimum, you have quantum Morse code.
If you change one of the particles it just breaks the entanglement. If you measure one, then you instantly know the state the other will have when measured, but the result of your measurement - and therefore the other one also - is random. The only way to correlate the two measurements of the two particles is to send the results (at C or slower) to the same place and compare them. Otherwise each just looks like a random result.
