Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Brite
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Brand Logo

agnos.is Forums

  1. Home
  2. Ask Lemmy
  3. Which of your favorite sci-fi tech seems achievable in a reasonable timeframe, say 100 years?

Which of your favorite sci-fi tech seems achievable in a reasonable timeframe, say 100 years?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Ask Lemmy
asklemmy
116 Posts 74 Posters 0 Views
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • zonefive@sh.itjust.worksZ [email protected]
    This post did not contain any content.
    D This user is from outside of this forum
    D This user is from outside of this forum
    [email protected]
    wrote on last edited by
    #38

    Ai and eeg can read brain waves generate images already kinda decent, maybe meet the robinsons memory viewer machine.

    medicpigbabysaver@lemmy.worldM 1 Reply Last reply
    1
    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldJ [email protected]

      Read the link posted. They already did it. In 2007. At a distance of 144km.

      D This user is from outside of this forum
      D This user is from outside of this forum
      [email protected]
      wrote on last edited by [email protected]
      #39

      I read it. Doesn't mention FTL, because that's not a possibility for actually transmitting info.

      Edit: I think the way these quantum encryption systems work is that basically the photons (and I assume it's polarization being measured) become the encryption key to a message that is sent conventionally.

      Like the sender generates a bunch of entangled photons, sends the paired ones to the recipient, measures their photons and uses the results to encrypt the message, the receiver measures theirs and gets the same results, the sender sends the encrypted message over email or whatever, and the recipient has the same key because of entanglement.
      Meanwhile an eavesdropper measuring the photons would mess them up for the recipient so the message wouldn't decrypt.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • N [email protected]

        (I know nothing about this)

        Could you to the sub-C measurement test enough times to show that it just empirically works, and then use it on that basis? Or are you saying that the sub-C measurement would prove that it doesn't work (and it produces random noise)?

        D This user is from outside of this forum
        D This user is from outside of this forum
        [email protected]
        wrote on last edited by
        #40

        I'm not sure what you mean by 'use it on that basis'. Yes, entanglement has been proven to work, but it can't be used to communicate FTL.

        1 Reply Last reply
        1
        • zonefive@sh.itjust.worksZ [email protected]
          This post did not contain any content.
          C This user is from outside of this forum
          C This user is from outside of this forum
          [email protected]
          wrote on last edited by
          #41

          Nuclear fusion seems increasingly achievable.

          C 1 Reply Last reply
          2
          • C [email protected]

            Nuclear fusion seems increasingly achievable.

            C This user is from outside of this forum
            C This user is from outside of this forum
            [email protected]
            wrote on last edited by
            #42

            They are down to 2 main problems now. The main one is (the cost of) scaling up. Fusion reactors will be more effective then bigger they are. The tiny test ones are already past break even.

            The other is wall material. Apparently the radiation has an annoying ability to transmute the elements making up the wall of the reactor. They are working out a material that can maintain its bulk mechanical properties, even with random elements appearing in its internal structure.

            Q 1 Reply Last reply
            5
            • zonefive@sh.itjust.worksZ [email protected]
              This post did not contain any content.
              mitm0@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
              mitm0@lemmy.worldM This user is from outside of this forum
              [email protected]
              wrote on last edited by
              #43

              Underwater cities

              D 1 Reply Last reply
              1
              • zonefive@sh.itjust.worksZ [email protected]
                This post did not contain any content.
                thisisamanwhoknowshowtogling@lemmy.dbzer0.comT This user is from outside of this forum
                thisisamanwhoknowshowtogling@lemmy.dbzer0.comT This user is from outside of this forum
                [email protected]
                wrote on last edited by
                #44

                Fast-refresh ePaper. I just want a laptop I can use outside, man!

                H B blackmist@feddit.ukB 3 Replies Last reply
                5
                • zonefive@sh.itjust.worksZ [email protected]
                  This post did not contain any content.
                  whotookkarl@lemmy.worldW This user is from outside of this forum
                  whotookkarl@lemmy.worldW This user is from outside of this forum
                  [email protected]
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #45

                  Tricorders, cellphones are already partway there they just need more durable, small sensors like a handheld light spectrometer to tell what things are made of and a handheld interferometer to detect gravity

                  I B 2 Replies Last reply
                  4
                  • zonefive@sh.itjust.worksZ [email protected]
                    This post did not contain any content.
                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                    M This user is from outside of this forum
                    [email protected]
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #46

                    Suicide Machines on Street Corners.

                    B viking@infosec.pubV B hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zoneH 4 Replies Last reply
                    3
                    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldJ [email protected]

                      Read the link posted. They already did it. In 2007. At a distance of 144km.

                      communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyzC This user is from outside of this forum
                      communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyzC This user is from outside of this forum
                      [email protected]
                      wrote on last edited by [email protected]
                      #47

                      No they didn't, they sent a conventional signal that was encrypted with an entangled particle. Nothing was sent ftl, this is like if I had two boxes that I know have the same thing in them, an encryption key, and traveled across the world, and sent you a message, you have the other box, the information in that box didn't go ftl you just opened it later.

                      there is no path to ftl communication here.

                      have a basic video on the topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oBiS_Yb9Ac

                      jordanlund@lemmy.worldJ 1 Reply Last reply
                      2
                      • communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyzC [email protected]

                        No they didn't, they sent a conventional signal that was encrypted with an entangled particle. Nothing was sent ftl, this is like if I had two boxes that I know have the same thing in them, an encryption key, and traveled across the world, and sent you a message, you have the other box, the information in that box didn't go ftl you just opened it later.

                        there is no path to ftl communication here.

                        have a basic video on the topic: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9oBiS_Yb9Ac

                        jordanlund@lemmy.worldJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        jordanlund@lemmy.worldJ This user is from outside of this forum
                        [email protected]
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #48

                        The FTL is the sci-fi component that is the subject of the thread, the quantum entanglement communication part is the real world piece they actually got working.

                        communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyzC 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B [email protected]

                          That is indeed that bit I was saying couldn't be done. Entanglement alone can't be used to communicate; a signal has to be sent conventionally over the distance.

                          The FTL bit is physically impossible, so it's not really "achievable in a reasonable time-frame"

                          jordanlund@lemmy.worldJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          jordanlund@lemmy.worldJ This user is from outside of this forum
                          [email protected]
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #49

                          This you?

                          I'm familiar with quantum entanglement. It doesn't work because you have no way of affecting which state you'll measure, and thus what state the other particle will be in.

                          That's exactly the part they DID get working.

                          B 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • whotookkarl@lemmy.worldW [email protected]

                            Tricorders, cellphones are already partway there they just need more durable, small sensors like a handheld light spectrometer to tell what things are made of and a handheld interferometer to detect gravity

                            I This user is from outside of this forum
                            I This user is from outside of this forum
                            [email protected]
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #50

                            Check out the app Phyphox, it uses all your existing sensors and probably surpasses tricorders in several ways while, of course, lacking in a few others.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            3
                            • T [email protected]

                              Portable communicators. It would be slick to have a USB c tricorder though.

                              I This user is from outside of this forum
                              I This user is from outside of this forum
                              [email protected]
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #51

                              Download the Phyphox app to access your phones raw sensor data. Very much like a tricorder.

                              T 1 Reply Last reply
                              1
                              • I [email protected]

                                Download the Phyphox app to access your phones raw sensor data. Very much like a tricorder.

                                T This user is from outside of this forum
                                T This user is from outside of this forum
                                [email protected]
                                wrote on last edited by [email protected]
                                #52

                                You've just destroyed my afternoon, thanks and congratulations

                                Edit: installed it. very cool. It would be crazy on my watch though.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • C [email protected]

                                  They are down to 2 main problems now. The main one is (the cost of) scaling up. Fusion reactors will be more effective then bigger they are. The tiny test ones are already past break even.

                                  The other is wall material. Apparently the radiation has an annoying ability to transmute the elements making up the wall of the reactor. They are working out a material that can maintain its bulk mechanical properties, even with random elements appearing in its internal structure.

                                  Q This user is from outside of this forum
                                  Q This user is from outside of this forum
                                  [email protected]
                                  wrote on last edited by [email protected]
                                  #53

                                  The only one I heard news about breaking even was that thing that shot a lot of lasers to a pellet. For a fraction of a second It broke even or produced slightly more than they poured in, but it was much less of what they spent.

                                  There's been something else new?

                                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • jordanlund@lemmy.worldJ [email protected]

                                    The FTL is the sci-fi component that is the subject of the thread, the quantum entanglement communication part is the real world piece they actually got working.

                                    communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyzC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    communist@lemmy.frozeninferno.xyzC This user is from outside of this forum
                                    [email protected]
                                    wrote on last edited by [email protected]
                                    #54

                                    It will never be possible to use this for ftl communications. This is like saying in 100 years we will use very long steel rods to communicate ftl by pushing on them. The problem is fundamental.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    2
                                    • L [email protected]

                                      borg nanoprobes, or replicator nanites of sg1 and sga.

                                      Q This user is from outside of this forum
                                      Q This user is from outside of this forum
                                      [email protected]
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #55

                                      Pre-progammed viruses to set in motion whatever changes you want in the body.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • Q [email protected]

                                        The only one I heard news about breaking even was that thing that shot a lot of lasers to a pellet. For a fraction of a second It broke even or produced slightly more than they poured in, but it was much less of what they spent.

                                        There's been something else new?

                                        C This user is from outside of this forum
                                        C This user is from outside of this forum
                                        [email protected]
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #56

                                        I saw a talk on the subject about a year back. It was discussing tokamak reactors, from an engineer working on them. The small ones can't sustain a break even state, but they are affected by the inverse square law to a larger degree. I believe China is about to start/has started construction on a power station sized test reactor.

                                        The pellet sort are a different type. They have different pros and cons.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • zonefive@sh.itjust.worksZ [email protected]
                                          This post did not contain any content.
                                          A This user is from outside of this forum
                                          A This user is from outside of this forum
                                          [email protected]
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #57

                                          We currently carry tricorders in our pockets. I can see a medical tricorder being ubiquitous for field medics, ships, and the like within 100 years.

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          1
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups