Vintage
-
This post did not contain any content.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Hi, how many miles per gallon does it get?
-
Hi, how many miles per gallon does it get?
Hi, how many
miles per gallongallons per mile does it get?FTFY.
-
This post did not contain any content.
Less electronics = less problems
-
Hi, how many
miles per gallongallons per mile does it get?FTFY.
Ironic, gallons per mile is actually a more useful measure for high fuel efficiency vehicles because it directly represents fuel consumption. Differences in MPG are more misleading to intuition as MPG increases.
For example, upgrading from an 18mpg car to a 28mpg car (Option A) saves more fuel than upgrading from a 34mpg car to a 50mpg car (Option B). It is easy to be misled that Option B would result in more savings because it is an upgrade of 16mpg rather than only 10mpg in Option A.
GPM does not have this problem and the differences can be compared directly, Option A in GPM is 5.5gpm -> 3.5gpm, for a difference of 2gpm while Option B is 2.9gpm -> 2gpm for a difference of only 0.9gpm, making it easy to see that the Option A is a greater impact to fuel economy than Option B.
-
Ironic, gallons per mile is actually a more useful measure for high fuel efficiency vehicles because it directly represents fuel consumption. Differences in MPG are more misleading to intuition as MPG increases.
For example, upgrading from an 18mpg car to a 28mpg car (Option A) saves more fuel than upgrading from a 34mpg car to a 50mpg car (Option B). It is easy to be misled that Option B would result in more savings because it is an upgrade of 16mpg rather than only 10mpg in Option A.
GPM does not have this problem and the differences can be compared directly, Option A in GPM is 5.5gpm -> 3.5gpm, for a difference of 2gpm while Option B is 2.9gpm -> 2gpm for a difference of only 0.9gpm, making it easy to see that the Option A is a greater impact to fuel economy than Option B.
In civilized countries we use litres per hundred kilometres
-
This post did not contain any content.
Okay but why does this look better than the actual thing though
-
Less electronics = less problems
Tesla being terrible not withstanding, electric vehicles require less maintenance than ICE vehicles, I believe.
That being said, fuck cars anyway, all my homies love walkable neighbourhoods with public and active transport
-
Okay but why does this look better than the actual thing though
because humans actually like smooth curves, as it turns out
-
Tesla being terrible not withstanding, electric vehicles require less maintenance than ICE vehicles, I believe.
That being said, fuck cars anyway, all my homies love walkable neighbourhoods with public and active transport
they'd still be better with less electronics, particularly if we reduce the electronics to the point where they are just the original prototype car with a better battery
-
In civilized countries we use litres per hundred kilometres
in sweden it's liters per mile
our mile is 10 kilometers, because fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck youuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuu
