One of them is statistically less likely to hijack a plane.
-
wrote on last edited by [email protected]
One of them is statistically less likely to hijack a plane.
Ok since some think I'm defending one over the other;
One of them is statistically less likely to hijack a plane, while the other is more likely to firebomb a woman's health clinic.
Both are as likely to drive a vehicle through a pride parade.
-
One of them is statistically less likely to hijack a plane.
Ok since some think I'm defending one over the other;
One of them is statistically less likely to hijack a plane, while the other is more likely to firebomb a woman's health clinic.
Both are as likely to drive a vehicle through a pride parade.
I could say this, but with the American version shooting foreign journalists and random people in the head, both are equivalent now.
-
One of them is statistically less likely to hijack a plane.
Ok since some think I'm defending one over the other;
One of them is statistically less likely to hijack a plane, while the other is more likely to firebomb a woman's health clinic.
Both are as likely to drive a vehicle through a pride parade.
More like one of them is statistically less likely to enter a school full of kids and shoot them dead.
-
More like one of them is statistically less likely to enter a school full of kids and shoot them dead.
Because there are no schools where the right picture was taken.
-
I could say this, but with the American version shooting foreign journalists and random people in the head, both are equivalent now.
I was leaning more towards the other bombing a women's health clinic.