OMG
-
Bro, Nancy Mace isn't people... She thinks she's people, but she's not people.
Yep. Nazis aren't actual people.
-
It is even dumber and more malicious than it sounds.
It's like the Republican Party got taken over by incompetent James Bond villains. However, despite what's portrayed in Live and Let Die, alligators don't normally prey on humans.
But alligators with frickin lasers on their head…
-
Vice signaling
wrote on last edited by [email protected]Sin signaling. It's the seven virtues and sins.
Vices are what lead you to the deadly sins. Alcohol or gambling is a vice, but not sinful in itself, etc.
They're well past vices.
-
Alligator Auschwitz
Backwater Birkenau
-
This post did not contain any content.
Maybe she's hoping there will be movies made about her. Like Nanzi, She-Wolf of the DHS.
-
But alligators with frickin lasers on their head…
Yeah, but are they Jewish space lasers on their heads?
-
Yeah, but are they Jewish space lasers on their heads?
Well, they’re Jewish alligators.
-
Ambition and a complete lack of shame
Which is almost enviable from a certain perspective... but only if you don't think about it for more than a fraction of a second.
-
WTF are we doing here?
Repeating the same goddamn mistakes again. This is what Americans supporting Trump want, all "undesirables" to be murdered. This is what tens of millions of us are.
"eat the rich" and "grab the guillotine" can be seen as having the same vibe ("all “undesirables” to be murdered"). Maybe violence shouldn't be the answer for either side, or maybe it is the answer for one side. I'm not going to advocate for it here, but I will say, we are a larger crowd... maybe don't fuck with us?
-
"eat the rich" and "grab the guillotine" can be seen as having the same vibe ("all “undesirables” to be murdered"). Maybe violence shouldn't be the answer for either side, or maybe it is the answer for one side. I'm not going to advocate for it here, but I will say, we are a larger crowd... maybe don't fuck with us?
There is a world of difference between evil people doing violence to innocent people who just want to live their lives, and doing violence to those evil people in order to protect the innocent
-
There is a world of difference between evil people doing violence to innocent people who just want to live their lives, and doing violence to those evil people in order to protect the innocent
Yes. But people are people. Just like not all us poors are innocent, not all them richs are evil. "eat the rich", for example, sets a presence of blanketed violence that we will never be able to escape. Preemptively killing someone because they might do evil isn't really any difference in end result to where we are now. The "undesirables", as they've been stated earlier, are not all innocent, and the USA government is kicking all of them out, because some of them might be evil (same as killing all the rich, because some of them are evil). I'm all for protecting the innocent, but the cost for doing so cannot be to kill other innocents. I don't have answers, only criticisms, which is one reason I never got into politics. And, in case it wasn't clear, these concentration camps they're proposing are abysmal, evil, and likely illegal (like that ever stopped them before).
-
"eat the rich" and "grab the guillotine" can be seen as having the same vibe ("all “undesirables” to be murdered"). Maybe violence shouldn't be the answer for either side, or maybe it is the answer for one side. I'm not going to advocate for it here, but I will say, we are a larger crowd... maybe don't fuck with us?
Jesus fucking christ you're a moron, critical support for whoever feeds you to an alligator
-
Thank you. Just what I was looking for.
I should have known "immigrants" would be involved, I think i just got thrown off by memories of "Drain the swamp" and thought this was about rival politicians.Good luck with everything.
Let me know if there's any way we can help 🫠Get the EU to invade and help us out?
-
Yes. But people are people. Just like not all us poors are innocent, not all them richs are evil. "eat the rich", for example, sets a presence of blanketed violence that we will never be able to escape. Preemptively killing someone because they might do evil isn't really any difference in end result to where we are now. The "undesirables", as they've been stated earlier, are not all innocent, and the USA government is kicking all of them out, because some of them might be evil (same as killing all the rich, because some of them are evil). I'm all for protecting the innocent, but the cost for doing so cannot be to kill other innocents. I don't have answers, only criticisms, which is one reason I never got into politics. And, in case it wasn't clear, these concentration camps they're proposing are abysmal, evil, and likely illegal (like that ever stopped them before).
wrote on last edited by [email protected]I don’t think you understand that quote. “Eat the rich” is part of the full quote, “when the people shall have nothing more to eat, they will eat the rich”. It’s not about killing rich people, it’s about class struggle and avoiding the situation where the wealthy have accumulated so much that the people are starving. In other words, it’s a warning to the rich not to take so much that they are the only food left.
-
I don’t think you understand that quote. “Eat the rich” is part of the full quote, “when the people shall have nothing more to eat, they will eat the rich”. It’s not about killing rich people, it’s about class struggle and avoiding the situation where the wealthy have accumulated so much that the people are starving. In other words, it’s a warning to the rich not to take so much that they are the only food left.
No I understand the origins. But I also have witnessed it used on here as a call to arms. I'm not referring to the origins, with which I fully agree but, rather, to what it has become as of late; it's current colloquial use.
-
No I understand the origins. But I also have witnessed it used on here as a call to arms. I'm not referring to the origins, with which I fully agree but, rather, to what it has become as of late; it's current colloquial use.
You really think “eat the rich” is too strong of a response to the rich literally building death camps and making snide jokes about feeding all of the brown people to the alligators? People saying “eat the rich” are crossing too big of a line in this situation?
-
This post did not contain any content.wrote on last edited by [email protected]
Jesus would be ashamed.
Matthew 25:32
32 All the nations will be gathered before him, and he will separate the people one from another as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats. 33 He will put the sheep on his right and the goats on his left.
34 “Then the King will say to those on his right, ‘Come, you who are blessed by my Father; take your inheritance, the kingdom prepared for you since the creation of the world. 35 For I was hungry and you gave me something to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you invited me in, 36 I needed clothes and you clothed me, I was sick and you looked after me, I was in prison and you came to visit me.’
37 “Then the righteous will answer him, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and feed you, or thirsty and give you something to drink? 38 When did we see you a stranger and invite you in, or needing clothes and clothe you? 39 When did we see you sick or in prison and go to visit you?’
40 “The King will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did for one of the least of these brothers and sisters of mine, you did for me.’
41 “Then he will say to those on his left, ‘Depart from me, you who are cursed, into the eternal fire prepared for the devil and his angels. 42 For I was hungry and you gave me nothing to eat, I was thirsty and you gave me nothing to drink,43 I was a stranger and you did not invite me in, I needed clothes and you did not clothe me, I was sick and in prison and you did not look after me.’
44 “They also will answer, ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry or thirsty or a stranger or needing clothes or sick or in prison, and did not help you?’
45 “He will reply, ‘Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.’
James 2
6 But you have dishonored the poor. Is it not the rich who are exploiting you? Are they not the ones who are dragging you into court? 7 Are they not the ones who are blaspheming the noble name of him to whom you belong?
8 If you really keep the royal law found in Scripture, “Love your neighbor as yourself,” you are doing right.
…
15 Suppose a brother or a sister is without clothes and daily food. 16 If one of you says to them, “Go in peace; keep warm and well fed,” but does nothing about their physical needs, what good is it? 17 In the same way, faith by itself, if it is not accompanied by action, is dead.
18 But someone will say, “You have faith; I have deeds.” Show me your faith without deeds, and I will show you my faith by my deeds.
Acts 2
32 All the believers were one in heart and mind. No one claimed that any of their possessions was their own, but they shared everything they had. 33 With great power the apostles continued to testify to the resurrection of the Lord Jesus. And God’s grace was so powerfully at work in them all
34 that there were no needy persons among them. For from time to time those who owned land or houses sold them, brought the money from the sales 35 and put it at the apostles’ feet, and it was distributed to anyone who had need.
Matthew 24
24 For false messiahs and false prophets will appear and perform great signs and wonders to deceive, if possible, even the elect.
-
I don’t think you understand that quote. “Eat the rich” is part of the full quote, “when the people shall have nothing more to eat, they will eat the rich”. It’s not about killing rich people, it’s about class struggle and avoiding the situation where the wealthy have accumulated so much that the people are starving. In other words, it’s a warning to the rich not to take so much that they are the only food left.
It is 100% about killing rich people. Also why guillotines are talked about in the context. I don't know why you are trying to spin it any other way.
-
She had a book to sell and realized that her base loves vitriolic poison. The more disgusting shit she can spew the more attention she gets. The more attention she gets the more donations she gets. No more books needed.
The current political climate in a nutshell...
-
Backwater Birkenau
Crocentration camp
