Is there any counter AI bots in the fediverse
-
why dont you make something like r/SubredditSimulator? It would be cool to see what modern llms can do in this respect.
A fun twist could be letting people post, and llms answer. Each with its specific angle.
-
cross-posted from: https://lemmings.world/post/21993947
Since I suggested that I'm willing to hook my computer to an LLM model and to a mastodon account, I've gotten vocal anti AI sentiments. Im wondering if fediverse has made a plug in to find bots larping as people, as of now I haven't made the bot and I won't disclose when I do make the bot.
Feel free to try, though I don't trust the LLMs enough to detect other LLMs.
-
cross-posted from: https://lemmings.world/post/21993947
Since I suggested that I'm willing to hook my computer to an LLM model and to a mastodon account, I've gotten vocal anti AI sentiments. Im wondering if fediverse has made a plug in to find bots larping as people, as of now I haven't made the bot and I won't disclose when I do make the bot.
What I am failing to understand is: why?
Is this just for some petty motivation, like "proving" that people can not easily detect the difference between text from an LLM vs text an actual person? If that is the case, can't you just spare all this work and look at all the extensive studies.
Or perhaps it is something more practical, and you've already built something that you think is useful and it would require lots of LLM bots to work?
Or is it that you fancy yourself too smart for the rest of us, and you will feel superior by having something that can show us for fools for thinking we can discern LLMs from "organic" content?
-
Please don't create a bot account that is not flagged as a bot. There is enough malicious activity that you might not see because mods/admins are doing their job.
There is no need to increase the volunteer work these people do.
If it's all volunteer based then they'll quit when it gets too much
-
why dont you make something like r/SubredditSimulator? It would be cool to see what modern llms can do in this respect.
No idea what that is an that subreddit is dead
-
Lemmy and Fediverse software have a box to tick in the profile settings. That shows an account is a bot. And other people can then choose to filter them out or read the stuff.
I know and it's up to the accounts author to do that. I know when I made my bot on mastodon. And counter measure against ai should start
-
If it's all volunteer based then they'll quit when it gets too much
This... This is how fediverse works though.. You are also on an instance run basically entirely on volunteer work.
If "we quit" there is no fediverse. On top of it all moderation tools are not mature enough yet.
You'd rather have your data scraped and sold? Or pay to use a platform like this?
-
Feel free to try, though I don't trust the LLMs enough to detect other LLMs.
Why is your name red?
-
Why is your name red?
It's your instance (lemmings.world) admin.
-
If it's all volunteer based then they'll quit when it gets too much
Well, that's all the nonsense I needed from you. Blocked.
-
What I am failing to understand is: why?
Is this just for some petty motivation, like "proving" that people can not easily detect the difference between text from an LLM vs text an actual person? If that is the case, can't you just spare all this work and look at all the extensive studies.
Or perhaps it is something more practical, and you've already built something that you think is useful and it would require lots of LLM bots to work?
Or is it that you fancy yourself too smart for the rest of us, and you will feel superior by having something that can show us for fools for thinking we can discern LLMs from "organic" content?
Why would be easy to understand. To implement counter AI measures, best way to counter AI is to implement it.
Btw I like the Lemmy hostility
-
This... This is how fediverse works though.. You are also on an instance run basically entirely on volunteer work.
If "we quit" there is no fediverse. On top of it all moderation tools are not mature enough yet.
You'd rather have your data scraped and sold? Or pay to use a platform like this?
Lol nice apparently stopping moderation means closing instances, plus how the fediverse works is redundancy. Someone can make an instance and make it complete anarchy and people can join it
-
What I am failing to understand is: why?
Is this just for some petty motivation, like "proving" that people can not easily detect the difference between text from an LLM vs text an actual person? If that is the case, can't you just spare all this work and look at all the extensive studies.
Or perhaps it is something more practical, and you've already built something that you think is useful and it would require lots of LLM bots to work?
Or is it that you fancy yourself too smart for the rest of us, and you will feel superior by having something that can show us for fools for thinking we can discern LLMs from "organic" content?
What I am failing to understand is: why?
People do things for fun sometimes. You could ask this about almost anything that people do that isn't directly and immediately related to survival. Why do people play basketball? It's just pointlessly bouncing a ball around in a room, following arbitrary rules that only serve to make the apparent goal of getting it through the hoop harder.
-
It's your instance (lemmings.world) admin.
Awwwww. I have interest in botting Lemmy instances. But it will be interesting to see if ai gets better with counter AI measures.
-
Lol nice apparently stopping moderation means closing instances, plus how the fediverse works is redundancy. Someone can make an instance and make it complete anarchy and people can join it
Instance administration is also quite time consuming and is also based on volunteer work.
The vast majority of content on lemmy will be inaccessible to an instance who is under complete anarchy / unmodded.
There is the fediseer project that helps instances block such instances.
If you spin up an LLM farm instance it's guaranteed to be blocked in many of the big ones - making your instance a lone island.
-
What I am failing to understand is: why?
People do things for fun sometimes. You could ask this about almost anything that people do that isn't directly and immediately related to survival. Why do people play basketball? It's just pointlessly bouncing a ball around in a room, following arbitrary rules that only serve to make the apparent goal of getting it through the hoop harder.
People do things for fun sometimes.
This is not the same as playing basketball. Unleashing AI bots "just for the fun of it" ends up effectively poisoning the well.
-
Instance administration is also quite time consuming and is also based on volunteer work.
The vast majority of content on lemmy will be inaccessible to an instance who is under complete anarchy / unmodded.
There is the fediseer project that helps instances block such instances.
If you spin up an LLM farm instance it's guaranteed to be blocked in many of the big ones - making your instance a lone island.
So they'll don't do LLMs because it will lead to instance that aren't connected to many other instances. Better than fediverse being gone
-
Why would be easy to understand. To implement counter AI measures, best way to counter AI is to implement it.
Btw I like the Lemmy hostility
To implement counter AI measures, best way to counter AI is to implement it.
You are jumping into this conclusion with no real indication that it's actually true. The best we get for any type of arms race is a forced stalemate due to Mutually Assured Destruction. With AI/"Counter" AI, you are bringing a medicine that is worse than the disease.
Feel free to go ahead, though. The more polluted you make this environment, the more people will realize that it is not sustainable unless we started charging from everyone and/or adopt a very strict Web of Trust.
-
A fun twist could be letting people post, and llms answer. Each with its specific angle.
/r/SubSimGPT2Interactive/ does this.
-
People do things for fun sometimes.
This is not the same as playing basketball. Unleashing AI bots "just for the fun of it" ends up effectively poisoning the well.
No, it's not the same. I was using basketball as an analogy. Someone who doesn't enjoy basketball wouldn't "get it", just as you're not "getting" the fun that can come from building and playing around with AI bots. Different people find different things to be fun.
